I had a requirement where I needed to index a new document only when there’s a
change in some of the fields. I implemented it using Solr’s deduplication
feature : https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_4/de-duplication.html
An example document:
{
userID: “userid”,
userName: “usernameA”,
userLogin
This certainly looks like a bug. I'm wondering if it's related to the
sortable text field used for the group field, possibly it's not handling
nulls in the same way a string field does. One thing to test is if you're
having problems grouping on a string field without nulls, and then a string
field
For the simple facet by field, is there any performance difference between
two?
Jae
This is not an Apache Solr question. This is a developer environment question.
I apologize for my lack of knowledge with ANT.
$ant common.test
...
-test:
[junit4] says jolly good day! Master seed: 3510B76A25B8399C
BUILD FAILED
/development/solr/lucene/common-build.xml:1599: The following
Andreas,
Do your nested documents contain only dynamic fields? I am on 8.6.3 and I
ran into this exact same issue. However in my case, even after disabling
catch-all dynamic field, I still see the child documents getting deleted.
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f47
Hi seez,
no, in my case, nested documents contained only fields as defined in the
schema. Actually, I didn't even use dynamic fields at all. It was just
the definition of the dynamic catch-all field that led to the problems.
It matched the name that was used to set nested documents. Because th
Hi Andreas,
Atomic updates are defined within these conditions:
The core functionality of atomically updating a document requires that all
fields in your schema must be configured as stored (stored="true") or
docValues (docValues="true") except for fields which are
destinations, which must be co
Thanks Cassandra.
Here is another question I have:
I don’t know what is the difference between following 2 commands listed on
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/enabling-ssl.html:
To me, they both are modifying same - clusterprop urlscheme property – one is
modifying using zkclient and other is
Also, the interaction of atomic updates with update request processors is not
documented.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Atomic updates are defined within these c
On 2021-04-19 10:32 AM, Phill Campbell wrote:
/development/solr//lucene/common-build.xml:1126: Reference junit.classpath not
found.
...
I don’t know if I have a system configuration problem, or if I am running the
ANT scripts incorrectly.
Any help appreciated.
Try adding something like
``
Which operators are supported in weightExpression field for Solr suggester.
e.g. if I want to use power function, should I use pow?
First I thought, it uses function queries. But it does not seem like that.
Following example shows that it is using the ln function.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_
11 matches
Mail list logo
