Re: TLOG/PULL query distribution

2024-08-27 Thread Wei
(BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) < klian...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > No worries, that's helpful. Thanks > > From: users@solr.apache.org At: 08/26/24 09:58:00 UTC-4:00To: > users@solr.apache.org > Subject: Re: TLOG/PULL query distribution > > Hey Kevin, > > I hope I'm no

Re: TLOG/PULL query distribution

2024-08-27 Thread Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
No worries, that's helpful. Thanks From: users@solr.apache.org At: 08/26/24 09:58:00 UTC-4:00To: users@solr.apache.org Subject: Re: TLOG/PULL query distribution Hey Kevin, I hope I'm not replying here too late. The best docs on this are in the "SolrCloud Distributed Request

Re: TLOG/PULL query distribution

2024-08-26 Thread Jason Gerlowski
Hey Kevin, I hope I'm not replying here too late. The best docs on this are in the "SolrCloud Distributed Requests" page [1]. In short though - by default Solr won't have any preference, it does "just" a round-robin or random choice among the healthy replicas for each shard. Users may provide a

TLOG/PULL query distribution

2024-08-15 Thread Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
Hello, Given a mix of TLOG/PULL nodes in our solr cloud, the behavior I'm observing from metrics is that CPU load is high for the leader TLOG (indexing) and the PULL nodes (read queries) however for the most part the other TLOG nodes remain very underutilized by comparison. My understanding is