Ah, thanks! That was not intuitive at all :-)
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 14:25, Thomas Corthals wrote:
> Hi Ishan,
>
> If you want a JSON object with key => value pairs instead of a JSON array
> with alternating keys and values in the response, you can add &json.nl=map
> to your request.
>
>
> https
Hi Ishan,
If you want a JSON object with key => value pairs instead of a JSON array
with alternating keys and values in the response, you can add &json.nl=map
to your request.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/response-writers.html#json-nl
Thomas
Op zo 16 jul 2023 om 01:41
Hi, Ishan.
May
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/response-writers.html#json-nl
help here?
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:44 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I used classic facets after a long time, and observed that the facet.field
> results in a list o
I used classic facets after a long time, and observed that the facet.field
results in a list of alternating keys and values:
https://gist.github.com/chatman/e475d8fe8e2bf1d7890aa7f75768865e
"facet_counts":{
"facet_queries":{},
"facet_fields":{
"unknownField":[
"val",1,
