I used classic facets after a long time, and observed that the facet.field results in a list of alternating keys and values:
https://gist.github.com/chatman/e475d8fe8e2bf1d7890aa7f75768865e "facet_counts":{ "facet_queries":{}, "facet_fields":{ "unknownField":[ "val",1, "val2",1] }, } Shouldn't it have been something like the following? "unknownField": {"val": 1, "val2": 1} Not sure if the current behaviour is intentional, but going forward does it make sense to change to the latter? I do understand that the JSON Facets API does the reasonable thing already.
