users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> Hi Karl,
>
> The mail thread mentions pre-existing issue refs that might be the cause,
> but they're not very enlightening on their own.
>
> Does this link for the mail archive work for
che.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17237
>
>
> From: Thomas Corthals
> Date: Thursday, 18 April 2024 at 09:16
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> Hi Karl,
>
> The mail thread mentions pre-existing issue refs that might be the cau
Michael Eves , Craig Wrigglesworth <
> craig.wriggleswo...@autotrader.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> Hi Karl,
>
> What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to?
>
> This sounds very similar to this issue:
>
> htt
> Date: Wednesday, 17 April 2024 at 16:49
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Cc: Michael Eves , Craig Wrigglesworth <
> craig.wriggleswo...@autotrader.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> Hi Karl,
>
> What is the exact version of Solr 9 y
April 2024 at 16:49
To: users@solr.apache.org
Cc: Michael Eves , Craig Wrigglesworth
Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
Hi Karl,
What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to?
This sounds very similar to this issue:
https://
: users@solr.apache.org
Cc: Michael Eves , Craig Wrigglesworth
Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
Hi Karl,
What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to?
This sounds very similar to this issue:
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
Hi Karl,
What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to?
This sounds very similar to this issue:
https://lists.apache.org/list?users@solr.apache.org:gte=0d:&header_subject=Invalid%20JSON%20response%20with%20UUID%20field
Thomas
Op wo 17 apr 2024 om 16:55 schreef Karl Stoney
:
>
