Hello Karl.
Please answer a few question in JIRA. Thanks

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:25 AM Karl Stoney
<karl.sto...@autotrader.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
> It does thanks, and actually I’m stumbled across that too.
> I’ve raised a Jira issue and referenced the Jira issue from that thread:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17237
>
>
> From: Thomas Corthals <tho...@klascement.net>
> Date: Thursday, 18 April 2024 at 09:16
> To: users@solr.apache.org <users@solr.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> Hi Karl,
>
> The mail thread mentions pre-existing issue refs that might be the cause,
> but they're not very enlightening on their own.
>
> Does this link for the mail archive work for you?
>
>
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fb717gcmjj92vxgq48g4ho8wct3zm4rct&data=05%7C02%7CKarl.Stoney%40autotrader.co.uk%7C7d3fe9633b55420604e308dc5f7fcee4%7C926f3743f3d24b8a816818cfcbe776fe%7C0%7C0%7C638490249757241793%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zOoU0uV7qToy08sHGbZN0WVfhFpmK3KkiD%2F3aKp4sxE%3D&reserved=0
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/b717gcmjj92vxgq48g4ho8wct3zm4rct>
>
> Thomas
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 08:34 schreef Karl Stoney
> <karl.sto...@autotrader.co.uk.invalid>:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> > That link doesn’t seem to work for me (might be that my corporate AV is
> > messing with it as it rewrites it to some outlook safe link!) – do you
> have
> > an issue ref?
> >
> > We’re trying to go to 9.5.0, which is the latest.
> >
> > From: Thomas Corthals <tho...@klascement.net>
> > Date: Wednesday, 17 April 2024 at 16:49
> > To: users@solr.apache.org <users@solr.apache.org>
> > Cc: Michael Eves <michael.e...@autotrader.co.uk>, Craig Wrigglesworth <
> > craig.wriggleswo...@autotrader.co.uk>
> > Subject: Re: Invalid JSON on solr9 when using a binary field
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > What is the exact version of Solr 9 you're trying to upgrade to?
> >
> > This sounds very similar to this issue:
> >
> >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Flist%3Fusers%40solr.apache.org%3Agte%3D0d%3A%26header_subject%3DInvalid%2520JSON%2520response%2520with%2520UUID%2520field&data=05%7C02%7CKarl.Stoney%40autotrader.co.uk%7C7d3fe9633b55420604e308dc5f7fcee4%7C926f3743f3d24b8a816818cfcbe776fe%7C0%7C0%7C638490249757241793%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MQQEGjmaVd2lWeyXrSFV3qttg6rFqyOnxr%2BWhDfbjOg%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/list?users@solr.apache.org:gte=0d:&header_subject=Invalid%20JSON%20response%20with%20UUID%20field
> >
> > <
> >
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Flist%3Fusers%40solr.apache.org%3Agte%3D0d%3A%26header_subject%3DInvalid%2520JSON%2520response%2520with%2520UUID%2520field&data=05%7C02%7CKarl.Stoney%40autotrader.co.uk%7C7d3fe9633b55420604e308dc5f7fcee4%7C926f3743f3d24b8a816818cfcbe776fe%7C0%7C0%7C638490249757241793%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MQQEGjmaVd2lWeyXrSFV3qttg6rFqyOnxr%2BWhDfbjOg%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/list?users@solr.apache.org:gte=0d:&header_subject=Invalid%20JSON%20response%20with%20UUID%20field
> >
> > >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Op wo 17 apr 2024 om 16:55 schreef Karl Stoney
> > <karl.sto...@autotrader.co.uk.invalid>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I’m currently looking into the solr 8 -> solr 9 upgrade, and we’ve
> > noticed
> > > that if a document is using a binary field, the json returned is
> invalid
> > > because the value is not quoted:
> > >
> > > For example on solr 8 we’d see:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > "STOCK_ITEM_BINARY_FIELD":”OikKAfqEdXJzSWRjNTEwMj…”
> > > ```
> > >
> > > But on solr 8 we get back:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > "STOCK_ITEM_BINARY_FIELD":OikKAfqEdXJzSWRjNTEwMj…
> > > ```
> > >
> > > (note both these examples are observed through the Solr UI too):
> > >
> > > This feels like a bug, but wanted to check here before I raised it as
> > one?
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on
> > > behalf of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place,
> > > Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628).
> > Auto
> > > Trader Limited is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email
> and
> > > any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally
> > > privileged, and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> > to
> > > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error
> please
> > > notify the sender. This email message has been swept for the presence
> of
> > > computer viruses.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on
> > behalf of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place,
> > Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628).
> Auto
> > Trader Limited is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email and
> > any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally
> > privileged, and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> > notify the sender. This email message has been swept for the presence of
> > computer viruses.
> >
>
>
> Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on
> behalf of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place,
> Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628). Auto
> Trader Limited is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email and
> any files transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally
> privileged, and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> notify the sender. This email message has been swept for the presence of
> computer viruses.
>


-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev

Reply via email to