a new container on a different host
machine and transfer all application data from the latest backup (which I did
minutes before issuing the conversion).
Can you give me any clues about what happened?
Thanks,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openv
der kernel).
>
> To workaround, install a new kernel (042stab092.x).
>
> Fixed in git:
> http://git.openvz.org/?p=ploop;a=commit;h=7e0365c0f8f
>
> Will appear in ploop > 1.12 (most probably 1.12.1).
>
> Kir
>
> On 08/08/2014 12:12 AM, Corrado Fiore wrote
evant modules are present on the destination node AFAICT.
What am I missing here?
Thanks,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> Out of curiosity, is Ploop 1.12.1 going to be released soon in the OpenVZ
>> Yum repo?
And here we are:
> From: Kir Kolyshkin
> Date: 3 September 2014 3:07:52 AM AWST
> To: annou...@openvz.org
> Subject: [Announce] ploop 1.12.1
>
> OpenVZ project has released a new ploop version.
Thanks a
and, offline migration of that container works fine.
The funny thing is that if I try to live migrate the container back to the
original host, I get the same error (Unsupported filesystem nfsd / Insufficient
CPU capabilities: can't migrate).
Shall I open a bug report for
x27;cat /proc/cpuinfo' of both hostnodes.
>
> Roman
>
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 21:43 +0800, Corrado Fiore wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have two OpenVZ nodes running the following:
>>
>> ploop.x86_64 1.12.1-1
>> ploop-lib.x86_64
read(desc): Input/output
error
Error: Failed to copy top ploop delta
=
Time for filing a bug I think...
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 19/09/2014, at 7:53 AM, Corrado Fiore wrote:
> Time for filing a bug I think...
Actually, there is a bug open for this issue already:
https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2736
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
ht
file system corruption
prevention (background scrubbing).
Another alternative would be to use Btier (www.lessfs.com). It's been
extremely stable and very fast in our experience.
Best,
Corrado Fiore
On 13/11/2015, at 8:37 PM, Nick Knutov wrote:
&g
Hi Nick,
could you elaborate more on the second point? As far as I understood, pstorage
is in fact targeted towards clusters with hundreds of containers, so I am a bit
curious to understand where you got that information.
If there's anyone on the list that has used pstorage in clusters > 7 - 9
oop and Qcow2 images live together side-by-side? So far, Qcow2 support has
been marked all over the wiki as "potential".
Also, will pstorage support KVM machines from the beginning?
(If I'm just missing information that is published on the wiki already, you're
welcome t
the seasonal break for
playing with VZ7 :-)
All the best,
Corrado Fiore
__
On 22/12/2015, at 8:11 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to share with you news on the latest changes in Virtuozzo 7
> development.
>
>
that
chunk server?
In simple terms, I am trying to find out whether in such a case pstorage
(coupled with HA features of the commercial Virtuozzo) would have prevented
downtime. I suspect it would, just searching for some official confirmation
from the experts. :-)
Thanks a lot,
Corrado Fiore
Hi,
you've got basically two choices:
(1) pstorage (known as Parallels Cloud Storage, Odin Cloud Storage and now
Virtuozzo Storage). Check on the OpenVZ wiki for that.
Notes:
• it can be distributed over multiple nodes (clustering)
• it will prevent data corruption / file system corruptio
ility comes
at a price of a long(er) development time and I'm not asking for any commitment
to an actual date. Just a few hints on 'how close we are' would be more than
enough :-)
Thanks a lot,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Us
ic - if RAMpage was merged into the VZ kernel, several
engineers that I know would be very interested.
What's your opinion?
Best,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
t,
some bug reports do not carry my name specifically but come from our team :-)
Best,
Corrado Fiore
___
> On 4 Jun 2016, at 1:30 AM, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
>
> Greetings -
>
> Based on our experience with OVZ 7 over the past several mon
exchange for more rock-solid features added to the VZ kernel.
(my 2 cents, of course)
Best,
Corrado Fiore
___
> On 4 Jun 2016, at 6:25 AM, Scott Dowdle wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The sub-subject of this should be: OpenVZ/Virtozzo 7 packages
ows triple redundancy without requiring 3x the disk space. We
obviously want it, but at the same time we're tight on time...
Can anyone share a hint about when Cloud Storage 2.0 will hit RTM? Just a
general timeframe would be enough.
Thanks,
Corrado Fiore
__
.125 to 8.8.8.8 on netif1
ICMP echo rply (84 bytes) from 8.8.8.8 to 192.168.144.125 on netif1
What am I missing?
Thanks a lot,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Chris,
one way in which you could avoid that problem is to use simfs instead of ploop
for that container. Otherwise, yes, you should compact containers on a regular
basis (preferably during off peak hours...).
HTH
Best,
Corrado
___
> On 3 Oct 201
Dear All,
I have noticed that VzLinux is shipping:
https://virtuozzo.com/products/virtuozzo-linux/
Will we be able to run OpenVZ 7 on top of it?
Thanks,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo
encountered such an issue before?
Thanks,
Corrado Fiore
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
23 matches
Mail list logo
