On 02/12/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
let's make it a project decision and not an
individual decision. I'll take this to the dev list now and, subject to
lazy consensus, in three days you will be able to reject Quick Office
Pro messages with backing from the project.
Update: we have consensus; s
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
My 2 cents as forum moderator.
We agreed on the forum to reject spam only. Therefore, we do not filter such
question when they come (but they are rather rare).
In such case we move them to the "General discussion" section with the
a
Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Ph
On 03/12/14 08:52, mt wrote:
> The idea of preparing a standard response to common posts that might
> create confusion/disruption on list is a very good one.
+1
>For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists
available to support other software products, including [Quick Off
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 03:52, mt wrote:
>
> For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists available
> to support other software products, including [Quick Office Pro or whatever],
> which are sold and distributed by commercial entities as profit-making
> products.
>
> We th
I'm not a moderator on this list, however I have some experience
from running & moderating other busy mailing lists for a long
time. So I'm putting this forward just as a suggestion, which I
have found to work perfectly in similar situations - hope this
is OK.
The idea of preparing a standard
Correcting (1-2)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 14:42
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Office Pro
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about
lind principle of any value in
this instance.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Simon Phipps
On 02/12/2014 Dave Barton wrote:
As inconvenient (probably irritating) as it is for list subscribers to
see this kind of post, we stand at the top of a very slippery slope if
we, as individuals, start making this kind of unilateral arbitrary
decision.
I see your point. I'm confident nobody want
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> >
> >> Simon Phipps wrote:
> >>> MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
> >> with a
> >>> message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated
Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
>
>> Simon Phipps wrote:
>>> MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
>> with a
>>> message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
>>> should contact their supplier. I su
Sorry Jim, but I disagree. It is not a moderator's responsibility or
requirement to answer questions on behalf of the list, be it by way of a
rejection or otherwise. Moderators are little more than "backstops" for
garbage that slips past infra's (pretty good) filters and to deal with
subscriber iss
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
> > MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
> with a
> > message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
> > should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators ado
Exactly. That's why Simon is providing info that OO/ Apache is not related
to
Quick Office; explaining that this group can't help re QO, and directing
the person making inquiry to a possible source for help since that help
can't be obtained here.
I can't think of a better function for a MODERATO
Simon Phipps wrote:
> MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
> message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
> should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
> approach.
>
> S.
-1
We are MODERATORS, not the
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> De
Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since this mailing list is f
On 09/22/2014 04:26 AM, T wrote:
> Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again,
> my files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't
> really sure how that worked. Is that even possible?
As others have already mentioned, that app is bogus and you should
repor
On 09/22/2014 05:26 AM, T wrote:
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my files
might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how that
worked. Is that even possible?
Terribly sorry for your loss, but you do not seem to have any idea what
On 09/22/2014 07:26 AM, T wrote:
> Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my
> files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how
> that worked. Is that even possible?
>
Your files should not have disappeared. They should still be there
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my files
might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how that
worked. Is that even possible?
> On Sep 21, 2014, at 5:32 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
>> On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote:
>> Hello,
>> My iP
T wrote:
Hello, My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I
tried to buy the app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use.
Is there something I can buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
This mailing list is for the Apache OpenOffice project:
http://www.open
On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote:
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
23 matches
Mail list logo
