On 02/12/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
let's make it a project decision and not an
individual decision. I'll take this to the dev list now and, subject to
lazy consensus, in three days you will be able to reject Quick Office
Pro messages with backing from the project.
Update: we have
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
My 2 cents as forum moderator.
We agreed on the forum to reject spam only. Therefore, we do not filter such
question when they come (but they are rather rare).
In such case we move them to the "General discussion" section with the
a
Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
Simon Ph
EuroOffice has been provided.
Those three programs (AnOO, LibO, EU) are close enough to AOo that
accurate support can usually be provided, even if one has never seen,
much less used the product in question.
> We therefore encourage you to go ahead and replace your [Quick Office
> Pro or wh
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 03:52, mt wrote:
>
> For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists available
> to support other software products, including [Quick Office Pro or whatever],
> which are sold and distributed by commercial entities as profit-making
>
rough a
network of volunteers offering their time for free.
For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing
lists available to support other software products, including
[Quick Office Pro or whatever], which are sold and distributed
by commercial entities as profit-making products.
We
Correcting (1-2)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 14:42
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Office Pro
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about
lind principle of any value in
this instance.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Simon Phipps
obody wants to see Quick Office Pro
questions on this list, but let's make it a project decision and not an
individual decision. I'll take this to the dev list now and, subject to
lazy consensus, in three days you will be able to reject Quick Office
Pro messages with backing from the proje
t;
> >> We are MODERATORS, not the list police.
> >>
> >
> > Please explain why you believe questions about QuickOffice are in-scope
> for
> > this list and thus should not be rejected by moderators?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > S.
>
>
in-scope for
> this list and thus should not be rejected by moderators?
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
I do not claim that questions about Quick Office Pro are in-scope for
the list. My objection is based on the principle, not the Quick Office
Pro issue itself. As per my reply to Jim, I maintain
ration, reject spam posts
and allow the valid messages through.
Until such time as the ASF changes it's list moderation requirements, or
I am removed as a list moderator, I will continue to moderate messages
such as "Quick Office Pro" through to the list.
Might I suggest that we
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
> > MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
> with a
> > message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
> > should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators ado
Exactly. That's why Simon is providing info that OO/ Apache is not related
to
Quick Office; explaining that this group can't help re QO, and directing
the person making inquiry to a possible source for help since that help
can't be obtained here.
I can't think of a better function for a MODERATO
Simon Phipps wrote:
> MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
> message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
> should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
> approach.
>
> S.
-1
We are MODERATORS, not the
:
> Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
>
>> I have a quick Office pro app
>>
>
> That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
> totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
> please report the app to the App Store. And of course we
Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since this maili
Hi there...
I have a quick Office pro app..it remains open for just a second on a
report I was doing.decided I needed to reinstall it which I didgot
charged again, as far as I could see and the same situationHelp!
Desmond O'Shaughnessy
Enviado desde mi
>
>>> On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote: Hello, My iPad crashed a few
>>> weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the app,
>>> the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something
a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-uns
On 09/22/2014 07:26 AM, T wrote:
> Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my
> files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how
> that worked. Is that even possible?
>
Your files should not have disappeared. They should still be there
ote:
>> Hello,
>> My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy
>> the app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I
>> can buy to repla
T wrote:
Hello, My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I
tried to buy the app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use.
Is there something I can buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
This mailing list is for the Apache OpenOffice project:
http
On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote:
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
-
To
25 matches
Mail list logo
