On 10/01/2014, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
> But as you point out, a pdf gets around that. If it has to be editable,
> there is a free add-on for older ms-word which allows reading odt, so
> even people using old versions of word should be able to read an odt.
> It's the same add-on that allows reading
On 10/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> jcish...@suddenlink.net wrote:
>> > To whom it may concern, My name is John, I have been using open
>> > office for some time now and fine it as good or better than
>> > windows office. I have a problem with AOO, every time I sen
On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> with all respect, this is BAD advice. It's an easy way to accomplish
>> nothing AND get ignored or start more flamewars.
>>
You're entitled to your opinion, I am only sharing my _personal_
satisfaction to be able to receive multi
On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> Actually, getting digest form means you get *all* the nonsense in the
>> same
>> message, and you have to dig through the whole thing to find *anything*
>> you
>> want to read.
>>
It is only a personal preference to like to recei
On 09/01/2014, users-digest-h...@openoffice.apache.org
wrote:
>>
>> Ummm. And I can do that how??
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maurice Howe
>> I'm retired. Go around me.
>>
Send a message to: users-digest-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org
although have noticed the following:
the only instruction that the di
Readers,
Occasionally read this mailing list; this time was amazed and amused
at the recent nonsense occurring.
For novices to mailing lists, a suggestion: subscribe using the digest
mode. You receive a delayed, single combined message of a group of
messages. It is an easy and convenient way to a