spect the JDK and language version specified
in the toolchain. (this is a new feature in NB22)
On 6/7/24 04:20, Fred Welland wrote:
Is there any way to have NB use source/target compatibility declared
in build.gradle to select a 'matching' (already configured in NB)
java platform (w
Is there any way to have NB use source/target compatibility declared in
build.gradle to select a 'matching' (already configured in NB) java
platform (w/o ?
So as to avoid having NB hammer in netbeans.hint.jdkPlatform= into
gradle.properties (which , for us, is under SCCS).
(Seem
Thanks very much Neil & Michael for the clarification and the helpful options
to consider. I now plan to bundle a JDK with the application and set myapp.conf
jdkhome param to refer to it. Eventually I'll look into jlink to trim down the
JDK although I'm a bit concerned about missing something s
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 at 11:53, Michael Bien wrote:
> Bundling a custom runtime (jlink) with the application might be also a
> consideration.
>
> There is also ... jpackage etc which might help there.
And of course, https://github.com/apache/netbeans-tools/tree/master/nbpackage
jpackage is proble
On 29.07.22 12:28, Mike Hallan wrote:
I want to know whether to tell end users that they must move to J11+,
or that J8 is still OK.
it highly depends on what user base you have, but there is usually no
good reason to use anything else outside of the latest java LTS release.
You get the late
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 11:28, Mike Hallan wrote:
> Does this mean that a NB Platform Application, compiled on NB 15 as described
> above, is compatible to run on Java 8? Or is this just luck that it ran on
> Java 8 and the error msg saying 1.8 is something that hasn't yet been updated?
>
> Also,
I know NB 15 is still not released but I'm using rc1 it because 14 had an issue
that made it unusable for me (forms designer frequently freezing).
After migrating from NB 12, the NB Platform's project 'Manage Platform'
remained at Java 8.
I found that the produced NB Platform Application ran fine
Is there a reference page someplace to show Netbeans compatibilities? Something
like:
Netbeans version, Minimum JDK
Netbeans 13, JDK 11
Netbeans 12.6, JDK 8
Could also have other dependency columns as well if wanted to expand further on
some dependencies (i.e. maven, ant, git, etc.)
Or would t
Which was the last version of netbeans which will support 32 bit windows 7
If you download a 32bit JRE (there's a 32bit Zulu) then I expect NetBeans
would work.
--emi
lun., 28 iun. 2021, 09:38 LOVELIN DHONI J.B
a scris:
> I want to download netbeans latest version on my PC. My PC is windows 7 32
> bit version. Does Netbeans 12.4 supports that or which version of Netbe
I want to download netbeans latest version on my PC. My PC is windows 7 32
bit version. Does Netbeans 12.4 supports that or which version of Netbeans
supports that.
Kindly reply soon.
gt; IDE changes?
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> From: Geertjan Wielenga
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 2:12 AM
> To: Neil C Smith
> Cc: Emilian Bold ; Adam Korynta ;
> users@netbeans.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Netbeans RCP Compatibility
>
>
>
> https://bits.ne
To: Neil C Smith
Cc: Emilian Bold ; Adam Korynta ;
users@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: Netbeans RCP Compatibility
https://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/apichanges.html
Gj
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:11 AM Neil C Smith
mailto:neilcsm...@apache.org>> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 10:03, Emil
ay, October 17, 2019 2:12 AM
> *To:* Neil C Smith
> *Cc:* Emilian Bold ; Adam Korynta ;
> users@netbeans.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Netbeans RCP Compatibility
>
>
>
> https://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/apichanges.html
>
>
>
> Gj
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct
ce.army.mil/cwms/ uses the RCP for
> reservoir management and reporting.
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* Geertjan Wielenga
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 17, 2019 1:02 AM
> *To:* Adam Korynta
> *Cc:* users@netbeans.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Netbeans RCP Compatibili
System https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/cwms/ uses the RCP for
reservoir management and reporting.
Adam
From: Geertjan Wielenga
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 1:02 AM
To: Adam Korynta
Cc: users@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: Netbeans RCP Compatibility
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:01 AM
https://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/apichanges.html
Gj
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:11 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 10:03, Emilian Bold wrote:
> >
> > > Note that every NetBeans release has the spec version of every module
> > increased, so this might not be a useful guide!
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 10:03, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
> > Note that every NetBeans release has the spec version of every module
> increased, so this might not be a useful guide!
>
> So besides diff-ing source code is there some way to see if something
> changed in the Platform?
Well, you can at lea
> Note that every NetBeans release has the spec version of every module
increased, so this might not be a useful guide!
So besides diff-ing source code is there some way to see if something
changed in the Platform?
--emi
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:46 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 20
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 00:21, Adam Korynta wrote:
> I assume Netbeans RCP 8.2 only supports JDK 8. Is this right? And is OpenJDK
> supported?
8.2 works great with OpenJDK 8, should you need that as a stopgap. I
shipped Zulu OpenJDK 8 with an 8.2 based application for some time,
although would p
> Is there a corresponding Netbeans RCP version for every Netbeans IDE release?
Yes, but there aren't necessarily Platform changes between NetBeans
releases. I think you could look at the individual module versions to
see if something actually changed.
> What JDK versions does Netbeans RCP 11 sup
The NetBeans Platform is simply part of NetBeans IDE. I updated the page
you referred to and the place to be looking for any info is
netbeans.apache.org, in your case especially
https://netbeans.apache.org/download/index.html. On the Download pages per
release you can see which JDK is supported, fo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:01 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> The NetBeans Platform is simply part of NetBeans IDE. I updated the page
> you referred to and the place to be looking for any info is
> netbeans.apache.org, in your case especially
> https://netbeans.apache.org/download/index.html. On t
Hi All,
Background:
Our organization is looking to start moving away from the Oracle JDK and moving
to OpenJDK and are researching all of the steps we will need to take for this
process. Currently, all of our applications are using the last Oracle 8 JDK
release.
We have several desktop applica
I mis-replied this before, so resending it.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Beansbinding can be brought back easily. We have the existing code
> service-based, we only have to put the GPL w/ CPE plugin somewhere online
> and suggest it to users, just like we suggest nb-java
>>> include
>
> > > >>> Netbeans, Firefox (since v5), Chrome, Eclipse, even application tools
>
> > >
>
> > > Excel,
>
> > >
>
> > > >>> Word and OpenOffice/LibreOffice, etc.
>
> > > >>>
>
over many years. Some identifable examples
>
> > > >>> include
>
> > > >>> Netbeans, Firefox (since v5), Chrome, Eclipse, even application
> tools
>
> > >
>
> > > Excel,
>
> > >
>
> > > >>> Word and Open
Hi,
Can we establish a page in the wiki with the problematic libraries:
org.jdesktop.beansbinding
org.jdesktop.swingx
javahelp
Are there others?
What is to do? How can the functionality in the first two be substituted?
What can we do to substitute javahelp.
best regards
Oliver
> The owner is
hat you describe already the case?
> Backward compatibility is one of the key aspects of NetBeans going many
> years back now.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:58 AM, * William
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you Geertjan,
>>
>> I understand the licie
Not sure I understand fully, but isn't what you describe already the case?
Backward compatibility is one of the key aspects of NetBeans going many
years back now.
Gj
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:58 AM, * William
wrote:
>
> Thank you Geertjan,
>
> I understand the licienseing poi
Thank you Geertjan,
I understand the licienseing point -- Yes in that specific case, yes the
plugin needs to be compatible.
I am unconcerned about specific missing plugins. I had hoped my point was
clear enough as this is something that applies to a Great Many products
that use "plug-in" and "ad
I am sure you are familiar with the feeling when your favoured tool or
> >>> add-on is no longer there? An example to talk to is this: the
> Netbeans RC
> >>> and Beta both happily supported the plugin QuickOpener during my
> various
> >>> opportunities
r with the feeling when your favoured tool or
>>> add-on is no longer there? An example to talk to is this: the Netbeans RC
>>> and Beta both happily supported the plugin QuickOpener during my various
>>> opportunities to trial these two pre-release candidates.
>>&g
> add-on is no longer there? An example to talk to is this: the Netbeans RC
>>> and Beta both happily supported the plugin QuickOpener during my
>>> various opportunities to trial these two pre-release candidates.
>>>
>>> Alas, Netbeans release 9 does n
sible and practical)
2. Usability -- Those features that I may use 4 or 24 times a
day are now gone.
I believe there are ways to be nicer to end-uers when
migrating / upgrading versions.
/*suggestion*/:
Here's an approach to improve the Use
, Netbeans release 9 does not. I'm sure there are reasons. I'm
>> taling to two points.
>>
>>1. Capability -- Evidently Netbeans as RC1 can support QuickOpener
>>(it is feasible and practical)
>>2. Usability -- Those features that I may use 4
feasible and practical)
>2. Usability -- Those features that I may use 4 or 24 times a day are
>now gone.
>
> I believe there are ways to be nicer to end-uers when migrating /
> upgrading versions.
>
> *suggestion*:
>
> Here's an approach to improve the User
when migrating / upgrading
versions.
*suggestion*:
Here's an approach to improve the User Experiece.
Support backward compatibility for just one version back. In this case
Netbeans 9 might have supported existing Netbeans 8 plug-ins. Not all of
them but from my using of Netbeans pre-relea
38 matches
Mail list logo
