...@gmail.com
Cc: neilcsm...@apache.org; jiri.koval...@oracle.com; NetCAT team; NetBeans
Mailing List; d...@netbeans.apache.org
Emne: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap updates
The 2 + 2 option makes sense to me. I'd be interested in hearing
people's thoughts about how this lines u
The 2 + 2 option makes sense to me. I'd be interested in hearing
people's thoughts about how this lines up with JDK releases:
* Is it better to do the NB testing after the general availability of
the JDK, or aim to have them released about the same time?
* What versions of JDK does Netbeans need to
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, 22:20 Jiří Kovalský I am glad to see that except two respondents the vast majority likes the
> proposal for only two mandatory major (with NetCAT programs) and two
> optional minor releases per year.
>
You could equally say that a vast majority of committers on dev@ wanted
fi
e what happens then and should discuss
it again after the last release of 2019. We should not overreact yet.
My 2 cents
Cheers
Chris
Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2018 18:08
An: net...@netbeans.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans roadmap updates
Well, it
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 22:17, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Maybe reducing the NetCat process or changing it?
OK, so in the interests of [DISCUSS] :-) I think Chris is right here.
I wasn't able to take part in NetCAT for NB10, but did for NB9, and
that process probably does need to adapt. We had a co
I like the idea of two major releases each year...those being releases
incorporating new functionality. However, I think it would be a good idea
to have patch releases in-between...making for a total of four releases
each year.
Josh
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 7:19 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi
I‘d agree wit Bayless. Two releases per year are better and a more realistic
goal.
Quality wins in the end and getting all those plugins over from 8.2 ASAP would
certainly enrich this platform.
Regards,
Claus
> Am 13.11.2018 um 15:36 schrieb Bayless :
>
> I would agree with two releases per
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, 14:16 Emilian Bold Two releases per year seems more manageable.
>
The point of 4 was to be more manageable though. Less changes, less
pressure for new features to meet deadlines (dropping 3 months less of an
issue)
I'm happy with either, but I don't think the current situati
I would agree with two releases per year. I think the quality would be
better.
Bayless
On 11/13/18 8:15 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
Two releases per year seems more manageable.
--emi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:19 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
Hi all,
We've completed the NetCAT process (on the f
Two releases per year seems more manageable.
--emi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:19 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've completed the NetCAT process (on the functioning of the convenience
> binary of Apache NetBeans 10) and the PPMC vote (on the sources of Apache
> NetBeans 10).
>
>
Hi all,
We've completed the NetCAT process (on the functioning of the convenience
binary of Apache NetBeans 10) and the PPMC vote (on the sources of Apache
NetBeans 10).
Right now, the IPMC (the incubator project management committee) is voting
on the sources of Apache NetBeans 10, since Apache N
11 matches
Mail list logo
