ags=mfp-trap-mode=su \
--enable-static --prefix=/opt/openmpi
[ ...snip... ]
$ make all
[ ...snip... ]
if /opt/gcc/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../opal/include
-I../../../orte/include -I../../../ompi/include -I../../../ompi/include
-DOMPI_CONFIGURE_USER="\"rob\&qu
machines
at a fairly reasonable speed.
So if the patch is small, I'd like to fix the problem with the 1.2.1 release
of openmpi on my system.
Also, I happily want to help with testing patches so that openmpi also is
going to work for Alpha systems. But keep in mind that I'm not an
nt of RedHat Enterprise Edition 4).
Hence, my packages are not so up-to-date versions:
autoconf-2.59-5
automake15-1.5-13
automake-1.9.2-3
automake14-1.4p6-12
automake17-1.7.9-5
automake16-1.6.3-5
libtool-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.2
libtool-libs-1.5.6-4.EL4.1.c4.2
flex-2.5.4a-33
(what else is essential to build O
Rob wrote at 2007-05-01 21:11:26 :
> I'm now trying the nightly build from SVN
> (version 1.3a1r14551), but I'm afraid that Alpha
> support is still not there.if that's the case,
> is there any chance to fix openmpi for Alpha?
Indeed this fails with the same error
compilers; the latter can handle F90 and F95 code, hence I'm able to
generate decent mpif77 and mpif90 compilers.
The "-mfp-trap-mode=su" flag is needed with GCC on the AlphaServers,
to prevent runtime SIGSEGV aborts.
Without the "F77_GETARGDECL", the MPI fortr
what about this -wd flag?
Rob.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
way to get OpenMPI work on my AlphaSystems?
Thanks,
Rob.
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
1203: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [btl_openib_component.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/Software/openmpi-1.3a1r14639/ompi/mca/btl/openib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Software/openmpi-1.3a1r14639/ompi'
make: *** [all-recursive]
know what to do next. I even have no idea what you mean
by "protect sections of the code".
CentOS follows the RedHat enterprise editions closely. My version is 4.4,
which is the latest for AlphaServer systems (CentOS 5 is recently released,
but not for AlphaServers). So
lphaServers, then
I am willing to help with tests on my systems.
By the way: does OpenMPI support running MPI on a variety
of architectures? Can I run MPI code parallel on Intel-PCs,
HP/Itaniums and AlphaServers (all running Linux/CentOS) ?
Hence, is this kind of cross-architecture supported in
-1.3XXX is under
active development.
What is recommended to use in this case for my cluster system?
I would prefer that the appropriate fix also be applied to 1.2.x series,
so that I can rely on the a stable version ?
Thanks,
Rob.
-
Be a better Heartthrob. Get
or will
it then erroneously use the ones in /usr/bin ?
Even better: is there a patch available to fix this in the 1.2.1 tarball, so
that
I can set the full path again with CC?
(is it only the CC macro, or also F77, F90, CXX, CPP and CXXCPP?)
Thanks,
Rob.
-
Be a
][btl_tcp_endpoint.c:572:mca_btl_tcp_endpoint_complete_connect]
connect() failed with errno=61
mpiexec noticed that job rank 0 with PID 1936 on node
es40 exited on signal 15 (Terminated).
4 additional processes aborted (not shown)
Could somebody give me a clue what has gone wrong
here?
Thanks,
Rob
aServer (es40) and HP/Itanium (64 bit)
OpenMPI: 1.2.2
errnos:
perl -e 'die$!=54'
Connection reset by peer at -e line 1.
perl -e 'die$!=61'
Connection refused at -e line 1.
Thanks,
Rob.
_
afternoon again, it might be friday until I can digg into that.
Was there any progress with this? Otherwise, what version of PVFS2 is
known to work with OMPI 1.6? Thanks.
Edgar, should I pick this up for MPICH, or was this fix specific to
OpenMPI ?
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer
On 03/27/2014 06:26 PM, Edgar Gabriel wrote:
I will resubmit a new patch, Rob sent me a pointer to the correct
solution. Its on my to do list for tomorrow/this weekend.
I also found a bad memcopy (i was taking the size of a pointer to a
thing instead of the size of the thing itself), but
off data sieving writes, which is what I would have first
guessed would trigger this lock message. So I guess you are hitting one
of the other cases.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
fault, not OpenMPI's
fault... until I can prove otherwise ! :>)
http://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/2089
==rob
In the testcase I first initialise an array of 25 doubles (which will be
a 5x5 grid), then I create a datatype representing a 5x5 matrix
distributed in 3x3 blocks o
On 05/07/2014 03:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Thanks Rob. I'll keep track of it over there. How often do updated
versions of ROMIO get pulled over from MPICH into OpenMPI?
On a slightly related note, I think I heard that you had fixed the 32bit
issues in ROMIO that were causing it to break
On 05/07/2014 11:36 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Thanks for the bug report and the test case.
I've o
self-contained tests.
I found the problem in MPICH, but i don't know how it relates to OpenMPI
-- the darray bug is one I introduced on tuesday, so OpenMPI's ROMIO
code should not have a problem with this darray type.
==rob
In the testcase I first initialise an array of 25 doubles (w
On 05/07/2014 11:36 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Thanks for the bug report and the test case.
I've o
about how to handle
these special cases, memory errors such as you report can happen.
==rob
Thanks
Edgar
On 5/15/2014 3:56 AM, CANELA-XANDRI Oriol wrote:
Hi, I installed and tried with version 1.8.1 but it also fails. I see the error
when there are some processes without any matrix block. It&#
s support every month -- probably more often. There's
clearly a community of Windows users out there looking for a free MPI
implementation.
Sorry to hear that MS-MPI is not yet MPI-3 compliant. There is also
Intel-MPI and Platform-MPI but I think you have to license those?
==rob
On J
on Microsoft's intentions regarding MPI and
C99/C11 (just dreaming now).
hey, (almost all of) c99 support is in place in visual studio 2013
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/07/19/c99-library-support-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx
==rob
On 2014-07-17 11:42 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
Rob Lath
c))
which (if I am reading fortran correctly) is a contiguous chunk of memory.
If instead you had a more elaborate data structure, like a mesh of some
kind, then passing an indexed type to the read call might make more sense.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
OpenMPI to pick up all
the bits...
As with Lustre, I don't have access to a PLFS system and would welcome
community contributions to integrate and test PLFS into ROMIO.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
mio resync. You are on your own with ompio!
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
/commit/97114ec5b
- http://git.mpich.org/mpich.git/commit/90e15e9b0
- http://git.mpich.org/mpich.git/commit/76a079c7c
... and two more patches that are sitting in my tree waiting review.
==rob
[jam:15566] [ 2]
/scr/chaarawi/install/ompi/lib/libmpi.so.1(ADIO_Set_view+0x1c1)[0xc72a6d]
[jam
On 08/10/2014 07:32 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
Update:
George suggested that I try with the 1.8.2 rc3 and that one resolves the
hindexed_block segfault that I was seeing with ompi. the I/O part now
works with ompio, but needs the patches from Rob in ROMIO to work correctly.
The 2nd issue
ion's type-inquiry routines.
*I* don't care how OpenMPI deals with UB and LB. It was *you* who
suggested one might need to look a bit more closely at how OpenMPI type
processing handles those markers:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/05/24325.php
==rob
Ge
n and send it
2. Copy values to a 1D array of size m*n and send it
i have no idea about the java mpi bindings, but can you describe the
type with an mpi datatype?
==rob
I guess 2 would internally do the copying to a buffer and use it, so
suggesting 1. is the best option. Is this the case or
construct an HINDEXED type
(or with very new MPICH, HINDEXED_BLOCK) and send that instead of copying.
==rob
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Rob Latham mailto:r...@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
On 08/22/2014 10:10 AM, Saliya Ekanayake wrote:
Hi,
I've a quick questi
recent versions,
take a binary for Intel-MPI, IBM-MPI, and MPICH and use different libraries.
There's almost no hope of being able to take MPICH and swap it out for
OpenMPI. MorphMPI might get you a bit of the way, but there are some
restrictions on what you can and cannot do with that.
On 09/17/2014 05:46 PM, Beichuan Yan wrote:
Hi Rob,
As you pointed out in April that there are many cases that could arouse ADIOI_Set_lock
error. My code writes to a file at a location specified by a shared file pointer (it is a
blocking and collective call): MPI_File_write_ordered
On 09/18/2014 04:56 PM, Beichuan Yan wrote:
Rob,
Thank you very much for the suggestion. There are two independent scenarios
using parallel IO in my code:
1. MPI processes conditionally print, i.e., some processes print in current loop (but may not print
in next loop), some processes do
scrutable -- and I like C-style 6 character variables a lot!
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
hat code to use PATH_MAX, not 256, which
would have fixed the specific problem you encountered (and might have
been sufficient to get us 10 more years, at which point someone might
try to create a file with 1000 characters in it)
==rob
Thanks for helping!
Eric
On 12/15/2014 11:42 PM,
//git.mpich.org/mpich.git/commit/a30a4721a2
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
receive the correct value
from one of the neighbors.
The code was compiled using PGI 14.7:
mpif90 -o direct.x -acc acc_direct.f90
and executed with:
mpirun -np 4 -npernode 2 -mca btl_openib_want_cudagdr 1 ./direct.x
Does anyone know if I'm missing something when using GPUDirect?
Thanks,Rob A
flags="--with-file-system=pvfs2+ufs+nfs"
I'm not sure how OMPIO takes flags.
If pvfs2-ping and pvfs2-cp and pvfs2-ls work, then you can bypass the
kernel.
also, please check return codes:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22859269/what-do-mpi-io-error-codes-mean/26373193#26373
n many situations.
Edgar has drawn the build error of OMPI-master to my attention. I'll
get that fixed straightaway.
==rob
At OrangeFS documentation (http://docs.orangefs.com/v_2_8_8/index.htm) is
chapter about using ROMIO, and it says, that i shoud compile apps with -lpvfs2.
I have tryed
PI-IO
implementation, was this one:
r10377 | brbarret | 2007-07-02 21:53:06
so you're missing out on 8 years of I/O related bug fixes and optimizations.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
On 02/27/2015 11:14 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
Well, perhaps it was time. We haven't changed anything about LAM/MPI in
...a decade? Now that the domain is gone, since I don't even have an
SVN checkout any more, I can't check when the last meaningful commit
was. I
Hi Rolf,
Sorry, this email got sorted into a separate folder and I missed it. I'll try
it out this week. Thanks! Rob
From: Rolf vandeVaart mailto:rvandeva...@nvidia.com>>
Reply-To: Open MPI Users mailto:us...@open-mpi.org>>
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Tue, 3
Hi all
I posted about a fortnight ago to this list as I was having some trouble
getting my nodes to be controlled by my master node. Perceived wisdom at
the time was to compile with the -enable-orterun-prefix-by-default.
For some time I'd been getting cannot open libopen-rte.so.7 which poin
iasoft
Early phase wiki: https://github.com/radiasoft/devops/wiki/DockerMPI
Thanks,
Rob
clusters and users who have no local credentials
(non-Unix user -- just a name and a home directory).
TIA,
Rob
and users can
package their code portably. The "module load" systems like Bright Cluster
offers are irrelevant. Let users build their images as they like with only
a few requirements, and they can run them with JupyterHub AND in an HPC
environment, which eliminates the need for Singularity.
Rob
echanism.
JupyterHub is a fine front-end for what we want to do. All we need is a
qsub that is decouple from Unix user ids and allows for the creation of
clusters dynamically.
Rob
olve the problem of queuing dynamic clusters.
SLURM/Torque, which Shifter relies on, does not either. This is probably
the most difficult item. StarCluster does solve this problem, but doesn't
work on bare metal, and it's not clear if it is being maintained any more.
Rob
s described above. Even being able to list
all the other users on a system (via "ls /home") is a privacy breach in a
web app.
Rob
'll play with Slurm Elastic Compute this week to see how it works.
Rob
blems. They are
running jobs on behalf of web users (like our problem) as a single unix
user id. Docker Hub runs containers as root to build images so they must be
able to lock down containers well enough.
Another thing we can (and probably should) do is verify the images have no
setuid files. I think this would eliminate a lot of the privilege
escalation issues.
Rob
nters. If we did not have this stupid hidden file with the
shared file pointer offeset to worry about, close becomes a lot more
simple. It's just that we open from rank 0 the shared file pointer with
DELETE_ON_CLOSE.
==rob
THanks
EDga
On 5/31/2016 9:33 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> issue of running MPI jobs with it, though.
>
>
I don't see how Singularity addresses the problem of starting MPI inside
Docker.
In any event, our current plan is to bypass resource managers completely
and start an AWS fleet per user request. The code is much simpler for
everybody.
Rob
-- clang won't warn about that, assuming we know what
we are doing (hah!)
==rob
you gave in the cb_config_list.
Try it and if it does/doesn't work, I'd like to hear.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
ted, is not going to perform very well, and
will likely, despite the library's best efforts, give you incorrect
results.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
that closing files comes a
little earlier in the shutdown process.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
ot free the subarray type)
- in writea you don't really need to seek and then write. You could
call MPI_FILE_WRITE_AT_ALL.
- You use collective I/O in writea (good for you!) but use independent
I/O in writeb. Especially for a 2d subarray, you'll likely see
better performance with MPI_FILE_WRITE_ALL.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
. MPI_SUCCESS) then
call MPI_ERROR_STRING(iret, string, outlen, ierr)
print *, string(1:outlen)
endif
end subroutine check_err
external32 is a good idea but nowadays portable files are better
served with something like HDF5, NetCDF-4 or Parallel-NetCDF, all of
which
ry inside OpenMPI-1.4.3 is pretty old. I
wonder if the locking we added over the years will help? Can you try
openmpi-1.5.3 and report what happens?
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
; in my program.
> It correctly worked on Open MPI on Linux.
> I would very much appreciate any information you could send me.
> I can't find it in Open MPI User's Mailing List Archives.
you probably need to configure OpenMPI so that ROMIO (the MPI-IO
library) is built with &
nsure that ROMIO's internal
structures get initialized exactly once, and the delete hooks help us
be good citizens and clean up on exit.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
m not an expert on the MPI IO stuff -- your code *looks*
> right to me, but I could be missing something subtle in the interpretation of
> MPI_FILE_SET_VIEW. I tried running your code with MPICH 1.3.2p1 and it also
> hung.
>
> Rob (ROMIO guy) -- can you comment this code? Is
where decomposing
the dataset over N processors will be more straightforward.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
ect of linear message passing behind the scenes, but
> that seems like a weird interface.
>
> Rob -- can you comment on this, perchance? Is this a bug in ROMIO, or if
> not, how is one supposed to use this interface can get consistent answers in
> all MPI processes?
man, what a w
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 06:54:32AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Rob -- can you comment on this, perchance? Is this a bug in ROMIO, or if
> not, how is one supposed to use this interface can get consistent answers in
> all MPI processes?
Maybe the problem here is that shared file poin
value of the shared
file pointer,
- Rank 0 did so before any other process read the value of the shared
file pointer (the green bar)
Anyway, this is all known behavior. collecting the traces seemed like
a fun way to spend the last hour on friday before the long (USA)
weekend :>
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
o so.
Do you want to rebuild your MPI library on BlueGene? I can pretty
quickly generate and send a patch that will make ordered mode go whip
fast.
==rob
>
> Troels
>
> On 6/7/11 15:04 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Troels Haugboelle wrote:
> &g
s.
Do you use MPI datatypes to describe either a file view or the
application data? These noncontiguous in memory and/or noncontiguous
in file access patterns will also trigger fcntl lock calls. You can
use an MPI-IO hint to disable data sieving, at a potentially
disastrous performance cost.
==r
and friends are broken for
XFS or EXT3, those kinds of bugs get a lot of attention :>
At this point the usual course of action is "post a small reproducing
test case". Your first message said this was a big code, so perhaps
that will not be so easy...
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
mpiexec or some
other means?
--
Rob Stewart
or ways to improve our
test coverage.
While it looks like this workload has been fixed in recent versions of
code, I'd like to include your test case to help us catch any
regressions we might introduce down the line. I'd change it to be
straight c and have rank 0 read back the file w
g a bit.
in general, if you plot "i/o performance vs blocksize", every file
system tops out around several tens of megabytes. So, we have given
the advice to just split up this nearly 2 gb request into several 1 gb
requests.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
here, or each processor will end up
writing the same data to the same location in the file. If you
duplicate the work identically to N processors then yeah, you will
take N times longer.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
some nice
ROMIO optimizations that will help you out with writes to GPFS if
you set the "striping_unit" hint to the GPFS block size.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
a long time, then switched to SVN in I think 2007?
I am way late to the git party, but git-svn is looking mighty
attractive as a first step towards transitioning to full git. One
more awful svn merge might be enough to push us over the edge.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Scienc
g but make the testing "surface area" a lot
larger. We are probably going to have a chance to improve things
greatly with some recently funded proposals.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:30:20PM -0500, Rayson Ho wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Rob Latham wrote:
> > ROMIO's testing and performance regression framework is honestly a
> > shambles. Part of that is a challenge with the MPI-IO interface
> > itself. For
penMPI
uses). Been on my list of "things to fix" for a while.
==rob
> Output from ompi_info --all for the 1.4.4 build is also attached.
>
>
> OpenMPI 1.4.4
>
> Trying 268435457 of float, 1073741828 bytes: successfully read 268435457
> Trying 536870913 of
mestamps in the file name:
http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/parallel-netcdf/browser/trunk/README#L19
(That note went into the README in June 2005. I guess I should have
done a better job advertising that ROMIO er, "quirk"? in the
intervening seven (!) years. )
==rob
> On Jan 21,
site.
> >
If you have any choice at all please do not enable NFS. It will work,
barely, but I'd rather see your users treat NFS as the broken
horrorshow it is (with respect to MPI-IO) than to use it at all.
==rob
> >Would this be a good recommendation for us to include in
RN, which is used for that purpose
in C.
It's important to note that MPI-IO routines *do* use ERROR_RETURN as
the error handler, so you will have to take the additional step of
setting that.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
be wrong.
> >
>
> I think but I am not sure that it is because the MPI I/O (ROMIO)
> code is the same for all distributions...
>
> It has been written by Rob Latham.
Hello! Rajeev wrote it when he was in grad school, then he passed the
torch to Rob Ross when he was a
size
MPI_FILE_READ(...) returns 'MPI_SUCCESS: no errors'. Well, read values
are just a mess.
Does anyone have an idea how to catch such an error?
The read succeeded. You would consult the status object to see how many
bytes were actually read.
==rob
nd
exactly what I'm after - is there a setup guide somewhere?
Thanks
Rob
tually using parallel I/O the right way.
I think you're OK here. What are you seeing? Is this NFS?
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
;, ret);
> } else {
> MPI_File_close(&fh);
> }
> MPI_Finalize();
> return 0;
> }
The error code isn't very interesting, but if you can turn that error
code into a human readable string with the MPI_Error_string() routine,
then maybe you'll have a hint as to what is causing the problem.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
tions to the table and reduce your overall I/O costs,
perhaps even reducing them enough that you no longer miss true
asynchronous I/O ?
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
supports it). If you really need
to experiment with async I/O, I'd love to hear your experiences.
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:32:24PM -0700, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> On 11/23/09 8:42 AM, "Rob Latham" wrote:
>
> > Is it OK to mention MPICH2 on this list? I did prototype some MPI
> > extensions that allowed ROMIO to do true async I/O (at least as far
> >
h OpenMPI as well as an example program
> because this is the first time I've attempted this so I may well be
> doing something wrong.
It sounds like you're on the right track. I should update the PVFS
quickstart for the OpenMPI specifics. In addition to pvfs2-ping and
pvfs2-ls
though. Nothing
prevents rank 30 from hitting that loop before rank 2 does. To ensure
order, you could MPI_SEND a token around a ring of MPI processes.
Yuck.
One approach might be to use MPI_SCAN to collect offsets (the amount
of data each process will write) and then do an MPI_FILE_WRITE_AT_ALL
river and it's not on the list? First off, let me
know and I will probably want to visit your site and take a picture of
your system. Then, let me know how much longer you foresee using the
driver and we'll create a "deprecated" list for N more years.
Thanks
==rob
-
On 01/05/2016 11:43 AM, Gus Correa wrote:
Hi Rob
Your email says you'll keep PVFS2.
However, on your blog PVFS2 is not mentioned (on the "Keep" list).
I suppose it will be kept, right?
Right. An oversight on my part. PVFS2 will stay.
==rob
Thank you,
Gus Correa
On 01/0
On 01/21/2016 05:59 AM, Dave Love wrote:
[Catching up...]
Rob Latham writes:
Do you use any of the other ROMIO file system drivers? If you don't
know if you do, or don't know what a ROMIO file system driver is, then
it's unlikely you are using one.
What if you use a driv
ta to/from file system).
not sure if that's what you were asking...
==rob
!
==rob
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
