On 07/17/2014 01:19 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
Damien <dam...@khubla.com> writes:
Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time to
approach them perhaps? MS MPI is based on MPICH, and if mainline MPICH
isn't supporting Windows anymore, then there won't be a whole lot of
development in an increasingly older Windows build. With the Open-MPI
roadmap, there's a lot happening. Would it be a better business model
for MS to piggy-back off of Open-MPI ongoing innovation, and put their
resources into maintaining a Windows build of Open-MPI instead?
Maybe Fab can comment on Microsoft's intentions regarding MPI and
C99/C11 (just dreaming now).
hey, (almost all of) c99 support is in place in visual studio 2013
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/07/19/c99-library-support-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx
==rob
On 2014-07-17 11:42 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
Rob Latham <r...@mcs.anl.gov> writes:
Well, I (and dgoodell and jsquyers and probably a few others of you) can
say from observing disc...@mpich.org traffic that we get one message
about Windows support every month -- probably more often.
Seems to average at least once a week. We also see regular petsc
support emails wondering why --download-{mpich,openmpi} does not work on
Windows. (These options are pretty much only used by beginners for whom
PETSc is their first encounter with MPI.)
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
Link to this post:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/07/24800.php
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
