Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-23 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jul 23, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Dave Love wrote: > The MPI ABI has not changed since 1.3.2. Good, thanks. I hadn't had time to investigate the items in the release notes that looked suspicious. Are there actually any known ABI incompatibilities between 1.3.0 and 1.3.2? We haven't noticed any

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-23 Thread Dave Love
Jeff Squyres writes: > The MPI ABI has not changed since 1.3.2. Good, thanks. I hadn't had time to investigate the items in the release notes that looked suspicious. Are there actually any known ABI incompatibilities between 1.3.0 and 1.3.2? We haven't noticed any as far as I know. > Note th

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Hmmm...there should be messages on both the user and devel lists > regarding binary compatibility at the MPI level being promised for > 1.3.2 and beyond. This is confusing. As I read the quotes below, recompilation is necessary, and the announcem

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-20 Thread Dave Love
gt; >> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org > >> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:26 PM > >> To: Open MPI Users > >> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 > >&g

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-16 Thread Brad Benton
-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:26 PM >>> To: Open MPI Users >>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released >>> >>> I believe that was the intent, per other emails on that subject. >&

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-15 Thread Ralph Castain
Users Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released I believe that was the intent, per other emails on that subject. However, I am not personally aware of people who have tested it - though they may well exist. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Jim Kress wrote

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-15 Thread Jim Kress
ilto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of jimkress_58 > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:05 PM > > To: us...@open-mpi.org > > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open > MPI v1.3.3 released > > > > D

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-15 Thread Ralph Castain
ere compiled using 1.3.2? > > > -Original Message- > > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org > > [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of jimkress_58 > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:05 PM > > To: us...@open-mpi.org > > Subject: Re: [OMPI

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-15 Thread Jim Kress
pen-mpi.org > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released > > Does use of 1.3.3 require recompilation of applications that > were compiled using 1.3.2? > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: announce-boun...@open-mpi.org > [mailto:

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 released

2009-07-14 Thread jimkress_58
Does use of 1.3.3 require recompilation of applications that were compiled using 1.3.2? Jim -Original Message- From: announce-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:announce-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:11 PM To: OpenMPI Announce Subject: [Open MPI