Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> writes: > Hmmm...there should be messages on both the user and devel lists > regarding binary compatibility at the MPI level being promised for > 1.3.2 and beyond.
This is confusing. As I read the quotes below, recompilation is necessary, and the announcement has items which suggest at least some of the ABI has changed. Could the promise also specify that future ABI changes will result in ELF version changes to avoid any more of the mess with the 1.2 and 1.3 libraries wrongly appearing as compatible to the dynamic linker? It should just be a question of managing changes and doing the right thing with libtool. > On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Jim Kress wrote: > > > Did not see any other email on the list wrt this topic. > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > Jim > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org > >> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:26 PM > >> To: Open MPI Users > >> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v1.3.3 > >> released > >> > >> I believe that was the intent, per other emails on that subject. > >> > >> However, I am not personally aware of people who have tested > >> it - though they may well exist. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Jim Kress > >> <jimkress...@kressworks.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Does use of 1.3.3 require recompilation of applications that > >> > were compiled using 1.3.2? > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org > >> > [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of jimkress_58 > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:05 PM > >> > To: us...@open-mpi.org > >> > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Open > >> MPI v1.3.3 released > >> > > >> > Does use of 1.3.3 require recompilation of applications that > >> > were compiled using 1.3.2? > >> > > >> > Jim > >>
