Good catch - thanks
Ralph
On Mar 11, 2014, at 5:29 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>
>
> Ralph, sorry. I missed a problem in the hwloc_base_util.c file.
> The "static int build_map" still depends on the opal_hwloc_topology.
> (Please see attached patch file)
>
> (See attached file: patch
Ralph, sorry. I missed a problem in the hwloc_base_util.c file.
The "static int build_map" still depends on the opal_hwloc_topology.
(Please see attached patch file)
(See attached file: patch.hwloc_base_util)
Tetsuya
> Ralph, sorry for late confirmation. It worked for me, thanks.
>
> Tetsuya
>
Ralph, sorry for late confirmation. It worked for me, thanks.
Tetsuya
> I fear that would be a bad thing to do as it would disrupt mpirun's
operations. However, I did fix the problem by adding the topology as a
param to the pretty-print functions. Please see:
>
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/o
I fear that would be a bad thing to do as it would disrupt mpirun's operations.
However, I did fix the problem by adding the topology as a param to the
pretty-print functions. Please see:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4356
Thanks for pointing it out
Ralph
On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:15 A
Hi Ralph, I would report one more small thing.
The verbose output in bind_downwards sometimes gives incorrect binding-map
when I use heterogeneous nodes with different topologies. I confirmed that
this patch fixedtheproblem:
--- rmaps_base_binding.
