Ralph, sorry for late confirmation. It worked for me, thanks.
Tetsuya > I fear that would be a bad thing to do as it would disrupt mpirun's operations. However, I did fix the problem by adding the topology as a param to the pretty-print functions. Please see: > > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4356 > > Thanks for pointing it out > Ralph > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 1:15 AM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote: > > > > > Hi Ralph, I would report one more small thing. > > > > The verbose output in bind_downwards sometimes gives incorrect binding-map > > when I use heterogeneous nodes with different topologies. I confirmed that > > this patch fixed the problem: > > > > --- rmaps_base_binding.c 2014-03-06 12:08:17 +0900 > > +++ rmaps_base_binding.try.c 2014-03-07 18:27:42 +0900 > > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ > > hwloc_bitmap_list_asprintf(&proc->cpu_bitmap, totalcpuset); > > if (4 < opal_output_get_verbosity > > (orte_rmaps_base_framework.framework_output)) { > > char tmp1[1024], tmp2[1024]; > > + opal_hwloc_topology = node->topology; > > if (OPAL_ERR_NOT_BOUND == opal_hwloc_base_cset2str (tmp1, > > sizeof(tmp1), totalcpuset)) { > > opal_output(orte_rmaps_base_framework.framework_output, > > "%s PROC %s ON %s IS NOT BOUND", > > > > Tetsuya Mishima > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > us...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
