Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Follow-up to Open MPI SC'16 BOF

2016-12-05 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
LOL! > On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > We're going to make Open MPI Great Again > > (don't shoot me please) > > >> Thanks to all who provided their opinion. >> >> Based on the results, the Open MPI developer community will work on v3.0.0 >> after the v2.1.x series. >>

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Follow-up to Open MPI SC'16 BOF

2016-12-05 Thread Jeff Layton
We're going to make Open MPI Great Again (don't shoot me please) Thanks to all who provided their opinion. Based on the results, the Open MPI developer community will work on v3.0.0 after the v2.1.x series. On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) mailto:jsquy...@cisco.co

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Follow-up to Open MPI SC'16 BOF

2016-12-05 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Thanks to all who provided their opinion. Based on the results, the Open MPI developer community will work on v3.0.0 after the v2.1.x series. [cid:FA30796A-0903-454E-A4E0-AB8FAE7FE732@cisco.com] On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com>> wrote: If you hav

Re: [OMPI users] [Open MPI Announce] Follow-up to Open MPI SC'16 BOF

2016-11-28 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
If you have an opinion on the v2.2.x-vs-v3.x question, please submit your vote by COB this upcoming Friday, 2 Dec, 2016: https://www.open-mpi.org/sc16/ Thanks! > On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Pritchard Jr., Howard wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > This is a followup to the question posed at th