LOL!

> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Jeff Layton <layto...@att.net> wrote:
> 
> We're going to make Open MPI Great Again!!!!
> 
> (don't shoot me please)
> 
> 
>> Thanks to all who provided their opinion.
>> 
>> Based on the results, the Open MPI developer community will work on v3.0.0 
>> after the v2.1.x series.
>> 
>> <Mail Attachment.png>
>> 
>>> On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If you have an opinion on the v2.2.x-vs-v3.x question, please submit your 
>>> vote by COB this upcoming Friday, 2 Dec, 2016:
>>> 
>>>    https://www.open-mpi.org/sc16/
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Pritchard Jr., Howard <howa...@lanl.gov> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> This is a followup to the question posed at the SC’16 Open MPI BOF:  Would 
>>>> the community
>>>> prefer to have a v2.2.x limited feature but backwards compatible release 
>>>> sometime
>>>> in 2017, or would the community prefer a v3.x (not backwards compatible 
>>>> but potentially
>>>> more features) sometime in late 2017 to early 2018?
>>>> 
>>>> BOF attendees expressed an interest in having a list of features that 
>>>> might make it in to v2.2.x
>>>> and ones that the Open MPI developers think would be too hard to back port 
>>>> from 
>>>> the development branch (master) to a v2.2.x release stream.
>>>> 
>>>> Here are the requested lists:
>>>> 
>>>> Features that we anticipate we could port to a v2.2.x release
>>>> • Improved collective performance (a new “tuned” module)
>>>> • Enable Linux CMA shared memory support by default
>>>> • PMIx 3.0 (If new functionality were to be used in this release of Open 
>>>> MPI)
>>>> Features that we anticipate would be too difficult to port to a v2.2.x 
>>>> release
>>>> • Revamped CUDA support
>>>> • MPI_ALLOC_MEM integration with memkind
>>>> • OpenMP affinity/placement integration
>>>> • THREAD_MULTIPLE improvements to MTLs (not so clear on the level of 
>>>> difficult for this one)
>>>> You can register your opinion on whether to go with a v2.2.x release next 
>>>> year
>>>> or to go from v2.1.x to v3.x in late 2017 or early 2018 at the link below:
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.open-mpi.org/sc16/
>>>>> 
>>>> Thanks very much,
>>>> 
>>>> Howard
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Howard Pritchard
>>>> HPC-DES
>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> announce mailing list
>>>> annou...@lists.open-mpi.org
>>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/announce
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> announce mailing list
>>> annou...@lists.open-mpi.org
>>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/announce
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> 
>> users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to