I have an environment a few trusted users could use to test. However,
I have neither the expertise or time to do the debugging myself.
Cheers, Jody
On 2010-03-29, at 1:27 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Mar 29, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Cristobal Navarro wrote:
i realized that xcode dev tools inclu
On 15-Aug-09, at 1:03 AM, Alan wrote:
Thanks Warner,
This is frustrating... I read the ticket. 6 months already and 2
releases postponed... Frankly, I am very skeptical that this will be
fixed for 1.3.4. I really hope so, but when 1.3.4 will be released?
I have to think about going with
On 11-Aug-09, at 6:16 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
This means that OMPI is finding an mca_iof_proxy.la file at run time
from a prior version of Open MPI. You might want to use "find" or
"locate" to search your nodes and find it. I suspect that you
somehow have an OMPI 1.3.x install that overl
ble
is dynamically linking to? Can I rebuild openmpi statically?
Thanks, Jody
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Klymak Jody wrote:
On 11-Aug-09, at 6:28 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
The reason your job is hanging is sitting in the orte-ps output. You
have multiple processes declaring themselve
On 11-Aug-09, at 6:28 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
-mca plm_base_verbose 5 --debug-daemons -mca odls_base_verbose 5
I'm afraid the output will be a tad verbose, but I would appreciate
seeing it. Might also tell us something about the lib issue.
Command line was:
/usr/local/openmpi/bin/mpirun
On 11-Aug-09, at 6:28 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
The reason your job is hanging is sitting in the orte-ps output. You
have multiple processes declaring themselves to be the same MPI
rank. That definitely won't work.
Its the "local rank" if that makes any difference...
Any thoughts on this o
On 10-Aug-09, at 8:03 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Interesting! Well, I always make sure I have my personal OMPI build
before any system stuff, and I work exclusively on Mac OS-X:
I am still finding this very mysterious
I have removed all the OS-X -supplied libraries, recompiled and
insta
dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
version 1.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
version 111.1.3)
Thanks, Jody
On Aug 10, 2009, at 8:53 PM, Klymak Jody wrote:
On 10-Aug-09, at 6:44 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Check your LD_LIBRARY_PATH - there i
$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/local/openmpi/lib: /usr/local/openmpi/lib:
So I'm afraid I'm stumped again. I suppose I could go clean out all
the libraries in /usr/lib/...
Thanks again, sorry to be a pain...
Cheers, Jody
On Aug 10, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Klymak Jody
So,
mpirun --display-allocation -pernode --display-map hostname
gives me the output below. Simple jobs seem to run, but the MITgcm
does not, either under ssh or torque. It hangs at some early point in
execution before anything is written, so its hard for me to tell what
the error is. Co
Hi Robert,
Sorry if this is offtopic for the more knowledgeable here...
On 14-Jul-09, at 7:50 PM, Robert Kubrick wrote:
By setting processor affinity you can force execution of each
process on a specific core, thus limiting context switching. I know
affinity wasn't supported on MacOS last ye
On 14-Jul-09, at 5:14 PM, Robert Kubrick wrote:
Jody,
Just to make sure, you did set processor affinity during your test
right?
I'm not sure what that means in the context of OS X.
Hyperthreading was turned on.
Cheers, Jody
On Jul 13, 2009, at 9:28 PM, Klymak Jody wrote:
Hi R
Hi Robert,
I got inspired by your question to run a few more tests. They are
crude, and I don't have actual cpu timing information because of a
library mismatch. However:
Setup:
Xserve, 2x2.26 GHz Quad-core Intel Xeon
6.0 Gb memory 1067 MHz DDR3
Mac OS X 10.5.6
Nodes are connected with a
Hi Ralph,
On 12-Jul-09, at 4:07 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Assuming that Scoreboard is appropriately licensed (i.e., is not
licensed under GPL, but preferably something like FreeBSD), and that
it has an accessible API, then we can link against it when in that
environment and interact any way
chine and compute a "score". Nodes with the highest
score get the job. However, how one would implement that using
openMPI is unclear to me. Does openMPI have the capability of passing
arbitrary arguments to the resource managers?
Thanks, Jody
Regards.
Vitorio.
Le 09-07
Hi Robert,
I ran some very crude tests and found that things slowed down once you
got over 8 cores at a time. However, they didn't slow down by 50% if
you went to 16 processes. Sadly, the tests were so crude, I did not
keep good notes (it appears).
I'm running a gcm, so my benchmarks ma
sure you'll get the rank
layout you'll want, though...or if that is important to what you are
doing.
Ralph
On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Klymak Jody wrote:
Hi Vitorio,
Thanks for getting back to me! My hostfile is
xserve01.local max-slots=8
xserve02.local max-slots=8
xserve03.local m
d we absolutely
# want to disallow over-subscribing it:
yow.example.com slots=4 max-slots=4
so in your case like mine you should have something like:
your.hostname.domain slots=8 max-slots=8 # for each node
I hope this will help you.
Regards.
Vitorio.
Le 09-07-11 à 10:56, Klymak Jody a écrit :
Hi
Hi all,
Sorry in advance if these are naive questions - I'm not experienced in
running a grid...
I'm using openMPI on 4 duo Quad-core Xeon xserves. The 8 cores mimic
16 cores and show up in xgrid as each agent having 16 processors.
However, the processing speed goes down as the used pr
19 matches
Mail list logo
