Fair enough, all good business reasons not to switch MPI platforms at
Microsoft's end.
Damien
On 2014-07-17 4:29 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:
[resending now that I've joined the Open MPI users list, sorry for the
duplicate]
Hi Jed,
Thanks for looping me on this mail thread.
Jed Brown wrote on Th
[resending now that I've joined the Open MPI users list, sorry for the
duplicate]
Hi Jed,
Thanks for looping me on this mail thread.
Jed Brown wrote on Thu, 17 Jul 2014 at 11:19:42
> Damien writes:
>
>> Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time
>> to approach them
If you support with intel fortran why not intel c99? User can still use msvc
Tim Prince
Original message
From: Ralph Castain
Date:
To: Jed Brown
Cc: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] latest stable and win7/msvc2013
Well, yeah - I dig that. However, barring doin
Damien writes:
> Visual Studio can link libs compiled with Intel.
The headers also need to fall within the language subset implemented by
MSVC, but this is easier to ensure and the Windows ecosystem seems to be
happy with binary distribution.
pgpHHN3ASH0QJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Visual Studio can link libs compiled with Intel. We used to make
binaries available for Windows with Open-MPI.
On 2014-07-17 12:58 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Well, yeah - I dig that. However, barring doing something stupid, I am hopeful
we'll be okay if I continue OMPI's practice of staying wit
Well, yeah - I dig that. However, barring doing something stupid, I am hopeful
we'll be okay if I continue OMPI's practice of staying within the C99 standard.
If MSVC won't support that, then we're out of luck anyway because there is no
way OMPI is going back to pre-C99 at this stage.
On Jul 1
Ralph Castain writes:
> Yeah, but I'm cheap and get the Intel compilers for free :-)
Fine for you, but not for the people trying to integrate your library
in a stack developed using MSVC.
pgpDnaWHH5nyy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rob Latham writes:
> hey, (almost all of) c99 support is in place in visual studio 2013
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/07/19/c99-library-support-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx
This talks about the standard library, but not whether the C frontend
has acquired these features. Are they a
Yeah, but I'm cheap and get the Intel compilers for free :-)
On Jul 17, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
>
>
> On 07/17/2014 01:19 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>> Damien writes:
>>
>>> Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time to
>>> approach them perhaps? MS MPI is b
On 07/17/2014 01:19 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
Damien writes:
Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time to
approach them perhaps? MS MPI is based on MPICH, and if mainline MPICH
isn't supporting Windows anymore, then there won't be a whole lot of
development in an increa
Damien writes:
> Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time to
> approach them perhaps? MS MPI is based on MPICH, and if mainline MPICH
> isn't supporting Windows anymore, then there won't be a whole lot of
> development in an increasingly older Windows build. With t
Is this something that could be funded by Microsoft, and is it time to
approach them perhaps? MS MPI is based on MPICH, and if mainline MPICH
isn't supporting Windows anymore, then there won't be a whole lot of
development in an increasingly older Windows build. With the Open-MPI
roadmap, the
Guess we just haven't seen that much activity on the OMPI list, even when we
did support Windows. I'll see what I can do - I think this new method will
allow it to be stable and require far less maintenance than what we had before.
On Jul 17, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Rob Latham
Rob Latham writes:
> Well, I (and dgoodell and jsquyers and probably a few others of you) can
> say from observing disc...@mpich.org traffic that we get one message
> about Windows support every month -- probably more often.
Seems to average at least once a week. We also see regular petsc
supp
On 07/17/2014 05:48 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
FWIW: now that I have access to the Intel compiler suite, including for
Windows, I've been toying with creating a more stable support solution
for OMPI on Windows. It's a low-priority task for me because it isn't
clear that we have very many Windows
With Open MPI 1.9a1r32252 (Jul 16, 2014 (nightly snapshot tarball)) i got this
output (same?):
$ salloc -N2 --exclusive -p test -J ompi
salloc: Granted job allocation 645686
$LD_PRELOAD=/mnt/data/users/dm2/vol3/semenov/_scratch/mxm/mxm-3.0/lib/libmxm.so
mpirun -mca mca_base_env_list 'LD_PRELO
FWIW: now that I have access to the Intel compiler suite, including for
Windows, I've been toying with creating a more stable support solution for OMPI
on Windows. It's a low-priority task for me because it isn't clear that we have
very many Windows users in HPC land, and the cygwin port already
Dear people,
As a continuation of the hint of Damien , who suggested using MPICH on WIN7
:
MPICH has already stopped supporting WINDOWS in the past. MPICH recommends
using MS-MPI for WINDOWS, which is a derivative from MPICH2.
You may download the binary (for free) from the landing page fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
