ibd0 and ce0 have to be on the same network for this to work. Or said
differently IP must be able to find a route between en0 and idb0. If
those are on different private networks (like 192.168.1.x and
192.168.2.x) this will not work.
Aurelien
Le 11 janv. 08 à 16:05, Rolf Vandevaart a écrit
Hello:
Have you actually tried this and got it to work? It did not work for me.
burl-ct-v440-0 50 =>mpirun -host burl-ct-v440-0,burl-ct-v440-1 -np 1
-mca btl self,sm,tcp -mca btl_tcp_if_include ce0 connectivity_c : -np 1
-mca btl self,sm,tcp -mca btl_tcp_if_include ce0 connectivity_c
Connec
Priya,
There is some level of support for thread safety. However, we're
actively working on this for our next release (1.3).
If you have any problems with thread safety please let us know.
Thanks,
george.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Priya Natarajan wrote:
Hi,
I have a question reg
Hi,
I have a question regarding the thread-safety features of Open MPI. I have a
multithreaded program in which two threads make MPI calls, so these threads
might call MPI functions concurrently. Can Open MPI support such a program,
i.e., is it thread-safe in such a scenario? I know that accordi
Try something similar to this
mpirun -np 1 -mca btl self,tcp -mca btl_tcp_if_include en1 NetPIPE_3.6/
NPmpi : -np 1 -mca btl self,tcp -mca btl_tcp_if_include en0
NetPIPE_3.6/NPmpi
You should then be able to specify a different if_include mask for you
different processes.
Aurelien
Le 11
Hi Adrian,
you guessed right: it is solaris.
. The user file space is shared and so ~/.openmpi is the same on
all machines.
. I cannot disable the "unwanted" interface because is is carrying
all the other services such as NIS, NFS etc
So the only way is to address the network by it IP number ra
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:36:23AM +, Lydia Heck wrote:
> I have a setup which contains one set of machines
> with one nge and one e1000g network and of machines
> with two e1000g networks configured. I am planning a
Are we talking about shared filesystems or can you place different
~/.openmp
I should have added that the two networks are not routable,
and that they are private class B.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Lydia Heck wrote:
>
> I have a setup which contains one set of machines
> with one nge and one e1000g network and of machines
> with two e1000g networks configured. I am planning
I have a setup which contains one set of machines
with one nge and one e1000g network and of machines
with two e1000g networks configured. I am planning a
large run where all these computers will be occupied
with one job and the mpi communication should only go
over one specific network which is c
