Re: About virsh(1) and Postcopy migration

2024-09-04 Thread Prasad Pandit
Hello Jiri, David [+cc dgilbert] On Thursday 29 August, 2024 at 04:58:39 pm IST, Jiri Denemark wrote: >> - Is there an ideal time to wait before switching to postcopy? > > Not really. As the name suggests this is meant as a timeout, > So logically the timeout should be long enough to give pre-c

Re: About virsh(1) and Postcopy migration

2024-08-30 Thread Prasad Pandit
Hello Jiri, On Thursday 29 August, 2024 at 04:58:39 pm IST, Jiri Denemark wrote: >> * Does the same waiting happen when using options (2) and (3) above? > >No. The explicit "virsh migrate-postcopy" request expects the user to >decide when to switch to post-copy by monitoring the migration. > >>

Re: About virsh(1) and Postcopy migration

2024-08-29 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:11:05 +, Prasad Pandit wrote: > Hello, > > * virsh(1) offers multiple options to initiate Postcopy migration: > > 1) virsh migrate --postcopy --postcopy-after-precopy > 2) virsh migrate --postcopy + virsh migrate-postcopy > 3) virsh migrate --postcopy --

About virsh(1) and Postcopy migration

2024-08-29 Thread Prasad Pandit
Hello, * virsh(1) offers multiple options to initiate Postcopy migration: 1) virsh migrate --postcopy --postcopy-after-precopy 2) virsh migrate --postcopy + virsh migrate-postcopy 3) virsh migrate --postcopy --timeout --timeout-postcopy When Postcopy migration is invoked via options