Re: capture system audio?

video downloadhelper has been working well for me, YMMV,... On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 1:01 PM Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 13:09 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > > I'm playing a video in firefox and want to capture the audio. > > > > There are a maze of web pages about audio capture,

Re: software trivia

emacs & vim On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:06 PM David wrote: > Somewhere deeply hidden in the author credits to a program that > ships with Fedora > > is the phrase: > > "Help poor children in Uganda !" > > Can you guess that program ? > > I guess that is an easy question for all you serious / hard-

systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

hi list, I have a small home domain (linuxlighthouse.com) running on fedora 32. I am trying to set up network services for DNS & HTTPS I have only the one server that I'm trying to provide all these services from, a single host using a static ip from att. i have a cascaded router config connectin

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

hi Peter, thx very much for your time & expertise. very much appreciated, jackc... On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:11 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 08.04.2021 um 22:37 schrieb Jack Craig : > > > > This was looking like a good solution until I got down to the end of the &

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:20 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:37 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > I have tried at length to get bind 9 to support proper a split > > horizon configuration without success. > > I remember going through that with you last year.

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

nswering this with a separate response because it goes off in a > different direction. You can decide which way to go without mixing up > all the information together. > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 12:03 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > I think I understand that the primary name server for doma

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:54 PM J.Witvliet--- via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > *From: *"Jack Craig" > *Date:* Monday, 12 April 2021 at 21:07:07 > *To: *"Community support for Fedora users" > *Subject:* Re: systemd-resolv

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:52 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 12:06 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > Oh so now I have learned something new. > > > > I thought that because I was a Domain owner, I had to do the > > translation from my public IP to my local DN

on to letsencrypt

hi list, so my bind config has apparently not worked despite my dig'ing. an external config checker says it finds no valid IP' for linuxlighthouse.com, i am failing http challenge. see link at https://check-your-website.server-daten.de/?q=linuxlighthouse.com and certbot failure has, ... 2021-

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:38 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 11:00 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > so my bind config has apparently not worked despite my dig'ing. > > > > an external config checker says it finds no valid IP' for > > linuxlighth

Re: on to letsencrypt

021 at 8:25 AM Doug H. wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Jack Craig wrote: > > hi list, > > > > so my bind config has apparently not worked despite my dig'ing. > > > > an external config checker says it finds no valid IP' for > > linuxl

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:52 PM Doug H. wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 16/04/2021 17:19, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 16/04/2021 10:35, Jack Craig wrote: > > >> First I get my static IP from AT&T actually a block of eight &

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 19/04/2021 03:18, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 16/04/2021 17:19, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > On 16/04/2021 10:35, Jack Craig wrote: &

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:27 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 20/04/2021 07:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Ed Greshko <mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: > > > > On 19/04/2021 03:18, Jack Craig wrote: > >

Re: on to letsencrypt

ipp 5000/tcp open upnp 8200/tcp open trivnet1 20005/tcp open btx Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.15 seconds On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:27 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 20/04/2021 07:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Ed

Re: on to letsencrypt

n, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:57 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 20/04/2021 09:27, Jack Craig wrote: > > on the other hand, ... ;O > > > > nmap -sS 108.220.213.121 > > Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org <https://nmap.org> ) at > 2021-04-19 18:26 PDT > > Nmap scan re

Re: on to letsencrypt

Apr 19 22:15:56 PDT 2021 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 125 <https://drive.google.com/u/0/settings/storage?hl=en&utm_medium=web&utm_source=gmail&utm_campaign=storage_meter&utm_content=storage_normal> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:50 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 20/04/2021 10:02, Jack

Re: on to letsencrypt

attached named.conf registrar = network solutions where they reference => ns3.attdns.com & ws.llinuxlighthouse.com On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:02 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 20/04/2021 13:32, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > the second problem is the secondary IP as identi

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:30 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 20/04/2021 18:09, Jack Craig wrote: > > attached named.conf > > Well a quick look and it doesn't seem too bad. First a couple of > questions. > > 1. Why did you use "acl" statements and then not r

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 6:24 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 20/04/2021 20:47, Tim via users wrote: > > I can see reasons to be your own webserver (e.g. not having to pay more > > for someone else to do it, you can configure your server any that way > > you like, etc). But when you register a domain n

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 5:47 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 03:09 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > attached named.conf > > It has the following lines in it: > > listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 10.0.0.1; 108.220.213.121; }; > allow-query

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:16 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 21/04/2021 03:36, Jack Craig wrote: > > netstat -nap | grep named > > > > tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:53 <http://127.0.0.1:53> > 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1090819/named > > tcp0 0

Re: on to letsencrypt

i'll do it first thing in the am and report results. THANKS!!! On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:02 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 21/04/2021 10:27, Jack Craig wrote: > > named.service > > > > it? > > ps -eaf | grep named > > named1263562 1 0 1

Re: on to letsencrypt

hat IP? (108.220.213.121) > > Jack Craig: > > Apparently not > > > > I can do a telnet connect to IP for port 53 from 10.0.0.1 & localhost > > > > 10.0.0.101 and the external IP do not connect > > > > As my external IP is being supported by port

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:48 AM Tim via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Tim: > >> Does your computer actually recognise one of its WAN ports as being > >> that IP? (108.220.213.121) > > Jack Craig: > > Apparently not > > > &g

Re: on to letsencrypt

ed, i found the caching file test, results shortly,... On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:48 AM Tim via users < > users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Tim: >> >> Does your computer actually recognise o

Re: on to letsencrypt

, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE -- Subject: Unit process exited -- Defined-By: systemd -- Support: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel i just swapped the provided file to /etc/named.conf and restarted, thoughts? On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:33 AM Jack Craig wrote: > ed

Re: on to letsencrypt

the results of the caching test aren't too encouraging, the error msg doesnt tell me much, recommended next step is? perhaps in the meantime you could outline how to configure my setup for your simler, /etc/hosts approach? tia, jackc... On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21 AM Jack Craig

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Tim via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 11:47 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > perhaps in the meantime you could outline how to configure my setup > > for your simler, /etc/hosts approach? > > I sup

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:06 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 22/04/2021 02:39, Jack Craig wrote: > > Apr 21 11:36:07 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com> > bash[1451129]: zone localhost.localdomain/IN: has 0 SOA records > > Apr 21 11:36:07 ws.l

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:08 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 22/04/2021 04:47, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > i have zone files for llh & reverse zone > > Oh, BTW, there is very little point in defining > > zone "213.220.108.in-addr.arpa" { >

Re: on to letsencrypt

'www.gstatic.com/A/IN': 2001:4860:4802:38::a#53 Apr 23 15:38:36 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[1815795]: network unreachable resolving 'www.gstatic.com//IN': 2001:4860:4802:32::a#53 Apr 23 15:38:36 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[1815795]: network unreachable resolving 'www.g

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:40 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 24/04/2021 07:13, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 24/04/2021 06:40, Jack Craig wrote: > >> netstat -nap | grep named > >> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:53 <http://127.0.0.1:53>0.0.0.0:* > LIST

Re: on to letsencrypt

since you've been guiding, i have changed only as guided,... rebooting, ... On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 24/04/2021 08:00, Jack Craig wrote: > > ps -ax | grep named > > 1814955 pts/4S+ 0:00 sudo vi /etc/named.conf > > 1814962 pts/4

Re: on to letsencrypt

listening on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53 Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953 Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: command channel listening on ::1#953 On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:47 PM Jack Craig wrote: > since you&

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:24 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 24/04/2021 08:47, Jack Craig wrote: > > since you've been guiding, i have changed only as guided,... rebooting, > ... > > Well, I don't think this is exactly correct. > > As I noted, the incorrect output s

Re: on to letsencrypt

CONNECTED 880216483/named [root@ws ~$ On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 24/04/2021 10:13, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > Maybe send your current named.conf? > > > > > > attaching isnt happening for some reason so i'

Re: on to letsencrypt

This is wonderful ED, Thank YOU!! first tho, a backup of key files... On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:37 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 24/04/2021 10:29, Jack Craig wrote: > > ok, done. now we have, > > > > > > Apr 23 19:25:59 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.lin

Re: UniFi Public Key Authentication

have you googled 'linux ssh how to login without password' ?? On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:27 PM Kevin Becker wrote: > I'm at a bit of a loss on this one so I thought I'd see if anyone has > any other suggestions. > > My home network is all Ubiquity UniFi gear. I have a USG-3P router, a > few swi

Re: on to letsencrypt

30.0.0.0:* 20563/named udp6 0 0 :::53 :::* 20563/named unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 130890 20563/named unix 2 [ ] DGRAM130887 20563/named On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:37 PM Ed Greshko wrote

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 04:32, Jack Craig wrote: > > almost, but no seegar,... > > > > i and continuing to have dig lookups for linuxlighthouse.com < > http://linuxlighthouse.com> a is timing out(refused or s

Re: on to letsencrypt

adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also doesnt seem to help... On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:28 PM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 01/05/2021 04:32, Jack Craig wrote: >> > almost, but no seegar,... >> &g

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: > > adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also doesnt seem to help... > > That file has nothing to do with the DNS server. > I thought that list of NSs was the NS list used to

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 12:59 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 19/04/2021 03:18, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:52 PM Doug H. <mailto:fedoraproject@wombatz.com>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Ed Greshk

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:14 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 12:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko <mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: > > > > On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: > >

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 1:32 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 15:31, Jack Craig wrote: > > seems t be working better, how many holes do you see at this point?? > > Since this now works > Well let's say it's limping along, as you point out below, it has some is

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:19 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 16:31, Ed Greshko wrote: > > After I sent the previous post I realized what I *think* is your goal. If > I recall you're wanting your > DNS server to service queries from inside your network as well as from > outside. > > As curren

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:25 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 20:07, Tim via users wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 12:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> You are missing the fact that you attempting to run a *public* DNS > >> server. > >> > >> That means that your DNS server must accept queries

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 1:58 PM Doug H. wrote: > On Sat, May 1, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > BTW, if you decide to go ahead with using views it would be helpful if > you have > > a system on the "outside" for you to use to test queries. > > > > As I understand it, all your "internal"

Re: on to letsencrypt

thx ed, i spent a whole day a week or so a couple weeks back to verify this secondary dns. i could swear that they said then i provide primary, they provide secondary. i'll pursue this more directly now. On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 1:24 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/05/2021 02:56, Jack Cra

dns wrap up

as this thread is approaching 100 msgs, time for a wrap up. below is where i *Think* i am, ;) *1. thanks to all that have provided dns configuration/testing insights* *2. i am not going to serve email* *3. i am not going to use views in named.conf, /etc/hosts trimmed to include only 127.0

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 6:32 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 11:56 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > i think you are right, i've been wondering about the ns3's behaviour > > as the dnscheck page keeps telling me i have only one responding dns. > > as it

dns glue or duct tape??

Hi folks With help from this list I recently updated my DNS configuration to provide for a primary and secondary DNS server where the primary DNS server is my host inside my domain and the secondary server is provided by AT&T I discovered that the secondary server on file with my registrar was w

first axfr challenges

*i am getting a notauth on my axfr attempt. what i am not seeing is an A ip# for the secondary dns server.* *is this missing A record a problem i need to fix for following host cli???* *dig @ws.linuxlighthouse.com axfr linuxlighthouse.com

Re: first axfr challenges

se is served by anything in my host's named.conf (et al) having any reference to my domain if it's not* *accessible/useful?* *i had thought that i should provide the primary server and my hosting service provided secondary, but* *that leaves only the secondary os i have only 1 responding * *Thx,

Re: first axfr challenges

Thanks Tim, If you aren't a teacher, you are missing an academic calling! Thanks again! On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:49 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 11:54 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > something i dont get, if my registrar provides glue references for > >

Re: first axfr challenges

Thanks for all your advice; you are right! I'll let the registrar do what they are already being paid to do. I really appreciate your guidance, jackc... On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 2:28 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/06/2021 02:10, Mike Wright wrote: > > Perhaps a lot of the confusion comes from the

Re: F34 pipewire no audio after updates

i too have this problem after f34 install. (fresh, not updated).given michael's status, what is the next thing to try? On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:52 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:14:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Am I the only one where audio is missing after rece

fedora34 & no audio

is there a way to disable pipewire how do you enable pulseaudio?? i got other fish to fry and it'd be nice if this audio JFW... ?? tia, jackc... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.f

touchpad for Fedora 34?

just joining the F34 party and craving a touchpad. recommendations for touchpad on F34/gnome 40?? tia, jackc... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of C

Re: touchpad for Fedora 34?

i want to swap from mouse to touch pad+kbd so,i am thinking, ... https://www.logitech.com/en-us/products/keyboards/k830-illuminated-tv-wireless.920-007182.html anyone got this one to work?? On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:51 AM George N. White III wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 09:12, J

Re: touchpad for Fedora 34?

23 tar xf /tmp/net.downloadhelper.coapp-1.6.3-1_amd64.tar.gz -C ~ 24 ~/net.downloadhelper.coapp-1.6.3/bin/net.downloadhelper.coapp-linux-64 install --user On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:28 AM Jack Craig wrote: > i want to swap from mouse to touch pad+kbd so,i am thinking, ... > >

has anyone got pipewire working F34??

hi list, has anyone got pipewire working? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ L

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 3:33 AM Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > su, 2021-09-05 kello 01:29 -0700, Jack Craig kirjoitti: > > hi list, > > > > has anyone got pipewire working? > > Yes. In what way is it not working for you? > first, i have a LGTV main display is a tv.

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 5:43 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 3:33 AM Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > >> su, 2021-09-05 kello 01:29 -0700, Jack Craig kirjoitti: >> > hi list, >> > >> > has anyone got pipewire working? >> >> Yes.

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

, 2021 at 8:28 AM stan via users wrote: > On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 06:49:04 -0700 > Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 5:43 AM Jack Craig > > wrote: > > What does running > aplay -lv > show as available devices? From all the errors, it seems there is

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:43 AM stan via users wrote: > On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 19:41:09 -0700 > Jack Craig wrote: > > > aplay -lv > > List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices > > card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0] > > Subdevices: 1/1 > >

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

i wanted to report gnome-control-panel sound see an output source, but not in when i do the testing, the speaker icon flashes, but no audio. On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:43 AM stan via users wrote: > On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 19:41:09 -0700 > Jack Craig wrote: > > > aplay -lv > >

pipewire configuration for f34

in trying to fathom my loss of audio out, i keep seeing reference to files in /etc/pipewire/ where my install has nothing! What am I missing? thx! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

DMI 4 HDMI Audio Output usbstream:CARD=NVidia HDA NVidia USB Stream Output suggestions?? tia, jackc... On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:40 PM Jack Craig wrote: > i wanted to report gnome-control-panel sound see an output source, but not > in > > when i do the testing, the s

Re: pipewire configuration for f34

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:19 AM Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > in trying to fathom my loss of audio out, i keep seeing reference to > > files > > in /etc/pipewire/ where my install has nothing! >

Re: pipewire configuration for f34

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:42 AM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 9/7/21 11:50 AM, Jack Craig wrote: > > *Thanks Jonathan.* everyone, apparently, but me!!! > > > > can you imagine using fedora and Not knowing that?! Yikes!! > > Yes, I can, because most users will never need that.

Re: pipewire configuration for f34

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:34:19 -0600 > Joe Zeff wrote: > > > > any idea why i am the lucky 'winner '?? > > > > Tish happens. Seriously, you might want to submit a bugzilla against > > pipewire, listing the workaround so that the devs will know wh

Re: pipewire configuration for f34

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:47 PM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:34:19 -0600 >> Joe Zeff wrote: >> >> > > any idea why i am the lucky 'winner '?? >> > >> >

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:57 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > Sep 01 18:33:11 fedora pipewire-pulse[1889]: pulse-server 0x55b24e6f3db0: > [gsd-power] ERROR command:-1 (invalid) tag:4 error:25 (Input/output error) > Sep 01 18:33:11 fedora pipewire[1888]: ALSA lib > dlmisc.c:226:(snd_dlsym

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

Osuggestions?? tia, jackc... > > Translates to hdmi:0,[0,1,2,3,4] > > Previously you showed the following output. This shows device as card > and device as device > > > aplay -lv > > List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices > > card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0] > > Subde

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:45 AM Jack Craig wrote: > > > Osuggestions?? tia, jackc... > >> >> Translates to hdmi:0,[0,1,2,3,4] >> >> Previously you showed the following output. This shows device as card >> and device as device >> >> &

Re: networked sound via pipewire

i am making a little progress, but as the gnome sound sees the stream,... that is the output config is seen... On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:54 PM Greg Woods wrote: > Is this actually possible right now? Pipewire is under rapid development > which means the documentation out there on it rapidly beco

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 9:13 AM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:45:10 -0700 > Jack Craig wrote: > > > i see ... > > > > aplay -L > > null > > Discard all samples (playback) or generate zero

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:37 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 9/12/21 12:54 PM, Jack Craig wrote: > > *I keep going back to test the sound and so far it continues to work > > it's a two speaker only but at least it's getting audio out .* > > Is there a reason for you

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

and you change it back to a working state how?? thx. On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:46 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 13:36:45 -0600 > Joe Zeff wrote: > > > Is there a reason for you to expect it to stop? Normally, once it's > > working it stays working unless you change something. >

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

bizarre, now its working on all monitors, go figure. Rather than guess whats up, i am going to take a break and list my pipe wire config. thx to all for assistance... On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 1:07 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 12:51:34 -0700 > Jack Craig wrote: > &g

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

sounds like my boat too. retired due parkinsons, but still chasing fedora. just to keep the 'lights on'. ;) On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 1:24 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 9/12/21 1:44 PM, Jack Craig wrote: > > do you have any advice to pass along ?? thanks > > Alas, no. Back

Re: has anyone got pipewire working F34??

/pipewire/pipewire.conf ~/.config/pipewire/pipewire.conf followed this chant... https://www.tomordonez.com/install-pipewire-linux-fedora/ reboot and test with gnome-control-panel sound thx for all the support,... On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 1:38 PM Jack Craig wrote: > sounds like

target - enable httpds

i am working to make letsencrypt .pem files work on my F34 workstation. so far, i try firefox browser, and, ... ssl:info] [pid 16630:tid 16630] AH01914: Configuring server www.linuxlighthouse.com:443 for SSL protocol [ssl:trace3] [pid 16630:tid 16630] ssl_engine_init.c(649): Using OpenSSL/system

Re: target - enable httpds

c(2242): [client 64.41.200.111:41040] OpenSSL: Exit: error in error thx... On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 9:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/29/21 13:30, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > i am working to make letsencrypt .pem files work on my F34 workstation. > > so far, i try firefox browser, a

Re: target - enable httpds

weird, i've been busy all day, but it is working now!! ?? On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 9:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/29/21 13:30, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > i am working to make letsencrypt .pem files work on my F34 workstation. > > so far, i try firefox browser, and, .

Re: target - enable httpds

Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:15 PM Jack Craig wrote: > weird, i've been busy all day, but it is working now!! ?? > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 9:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 10/29/21 13:30, Jack Craig wrote: >> > >> > i am working to make letsencrypt .pem

anyone using namebench for fast dns

if there is a better fast dns lookup, i'd be interested to learn f it. thx, jackc... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorap

<    1   2   3   4   5   6