*post reboot*

*systemctl status named*
● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)
     Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; disabled;
vendor preset: disabled)
     Active: active (running) since Fri 2021-04-23 17:51:14 PDT; 5s ago
    Process: 3507 ExecStartPre=/bin/bash -c if [ ! "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING"
== "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z "$NAMEDCONF"; else echo
"Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
    Process: 3509 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named -c ${NAMEDCONF}
$OPTIONS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
   Main PID: 3510 (named)
      Tasks: 11 (limit: 38336)
     Memory: 66.0M
        CPU: 94ms
     CGroup: /system.slice/named.service
             └─3510 /usr/sbin/named -u named -c /etc/named.conf

Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './DNSKEY/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './NS/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './DNSKEY/IN': 2001:7fd::1#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './NS/IN': 2001:7fd::1#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './DNSKEY/IN': 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './NS/IN': 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './DNSKEY/IN': 2001:500:12::d0d#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: network unreachable
resolving './NS/IN': 2001:500:12::d0d#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: managed-keys-zone: Key
20326 for zone . acceptance timer complete: key … trusted
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: resolver priming query
complete
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
[root@ws jackc$ *journalctl -b 0 | grep -i listen | grep named*
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: using 7 UDP listeners
per interface
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: listening on IPv4
interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: listening on IPv6
interface lo, ::1#53
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: command channel
listening on 127.0.0.1#953
Apr 23 17:51:14 ws.linuxlighthouse.com named[3510]: command channel
listening on ::1#953



On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:47 PM Jack Craig <jack.craig.ap...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> since you've been guiding, i have  changed only as guided,...  rebooting,
> ...
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:20 PM Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24/04/2021 08:00, Jack Craig wrote:
>> > ps -ax | grep named
>> > 1814955 pts/4    S+     0:00 sudo vi /etc/named.conf
>> > 1814962 pts/4    S+     0:00 /usr/bin/vim /etc/named.conf
>> > 1815795 ?        Ssl    0:09 /usr/sbin/named -u named -c /etc/named.conf
>> > 1825164 pts/0    S+     0:00 grep --color=auto named
>> > [root@ws named$
>> > [root@ws named$ ncat -l 10.0.0.101 53
>> >
>> > it does 'hang'
>>
>> OK....  Had you left it hanging then had I run "nmap -sS 108.220.213.1"
>> should have shown the
>> port "open"
>>
>> See the comments below.
>>
>> This series on 4/13 is "good".  Listening on all interfaces
>>
>> > journalctl -b 0 | grep -i listen | grep named
>> > Apr 13 22:42:48 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: using 7 UDP listeners per interface
>> > Apr 13 22:42:48 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53
>> > Apr 13 22:42:48 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
>> > Apr 13 22:42:48 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
>> > Apr 13 22:42:53 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: listening on IPv4 interface eno1, 10.0.0.101#53
>> > Apr 13 22:42:54 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: listening on IPv4 interface virbr0, 192.168.122.1#53
>> > Apr 15 07:55:08 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: client @0x7f50600e6060 89.39.107.167#39720 (
>> mailgate.listen.com <http://mailgate.listen.com>): view
>> external-wan-view: query: mailgate.listen.com <http://mailgate.listen.com>
>> IN A +T (10.0.0.101)
>> > Apr 15 09:24:02 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: client @0x7f505c0ef630 91.191.209.122#44020 (
>> mx.foodamentalisten.de <http://mx.foodamentalisten.de>): view
>> external-wan-view: query: mx.foodamentalisten.de <
>> http://mx.foodamentalisten.de> IN A +T (10.0.0.101)
>>
>> Probably a "systemctl restart named" issued.  PID 905 is shutting down.
>>
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: no longer listening on ::#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: no longer listening on 127.0.0.1#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: no longer listening on 10.0.0.101#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[905]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.1#53
>>
>> And a new PID 309193 is starting.  Also 309193 shows "good"
>>
>>
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: using 7 UDP listeners per interface
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: listening on IPv4 interface eno1, 10.0.0.101#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: listening on IPv4 interface virbr0, 192.168.122.1#53
>> > Apr 15 11:29:22 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
>> > Apr 15 12:57:26 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: no longer listening on ::#53
>> > Apr 15 12:57:26 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: no longer listening on 127.0.0.1#53
>> > Apr 15 12:57:26 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: no longer listening on 10.0.0.101#53
>> > Apr 15 12:57:26 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[309193]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.1#53
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>> Here named is getting shutdown.
>>
>> >
>> > Apr 15 19:02:47 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[336009]: no longer listening on ::#53
>> > Apr 15 19:02:47 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[336009]: no longer listening on 127.0.0.1#53
>> > Apr 15 19:02:47 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[336009]: no longer listening on 10.0.0.101#53
>> > Apr 15 19:02:47 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
>> named[336009]: no longer listening on 192.168.122.1#53
>>
>> The next day when name is started again we no longer see....
>>
>> listening on IPv4 interface eno1, 10.0.0.101#53
>>
>> So, what happened?  What changed?  All subsequent entries are "bad".
>>
>> For "fun" how about rebooting the system?
>>
>> --
>> Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to