Hello,
does somebody know, what is the current situation regarding soft
dependencies in Fedora?
OpenSuse already supports them
(http://en.opensuse.org/Software_Management/Dependencies) and according
the link
http://stick.gk2.sk/blog/2009/10/rpm-summit-at-the-opensuse-conference-2009/
it shou
On 03/21/2011 06:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 10:16 AM, stan wrote:
>> And it
>> begs the question of*why* people might be deserting Fedora.
> No it doesn't; it *ASKS* the question. "Begging the question" is a
> logical fallacy. Please stop using that term like an illiterate moron,
>
On 04/03/2011 03:57 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 02/04/11 23:32, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 22:17:43 +0200,
>> "Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
>>> I've found that on F12 I have mesa-dri-drivers-experimental installed
>>> whereas on
>>> F14 it is "only" mesa-dri-drivers. I've n
On 03/10/2011 05:08 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kam Leo wrote:
>> It probably has less to do with the boot process and more with disto
>> upgrading; i.e. less likely that user files get clobbered if /usr is
>> separate.
> Nope. It has everything to do with booting. Some packages in /bin
> depe
On 04/14/2011 01:58 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 02:01 PM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>> On 03/10/2011 05:08 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> Kam Leo wrote:
>>>> It probably has less to do with the boot process and more with disto
>>>> upgra
On 04/14/2011 07:31 PM, JD wrote:
> Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>> It reminds me, that few months back I observed that Fedora's binaries in
>>> /bin are much bigger that Slackware's binaries (tens of %), both +- the
>>> same version. Now, I am wondering why, if it
On 04/14/2011 07:40 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 08:12 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>> Well, ldd confirms that it is an urban legend.
>> On my system ldd is in /usr/bin, not /bin
> ldd an analysis tool (Print shared library dependenc
The problem is that ARM is for Fedora the secondary architecture; unless
it is changed I don't expect we can use it with some tablets.
V.M.
On 10/22/2010 05:10 PM, James Szinger wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> I would have little interest
>> in it
On 10/23/2010 06:22 PM, sumatheja wrote:
> Sumatheja Dasararaju
Well, I suggest to run "man mount" and read the section "File
Independent Mount Options".
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On 10/23/2010 09:23 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 17:04 +0100, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>> The problem is that ARM is for Fedora the secondary architecture; unless
>> it is changed I don't expect we can use it with some tablets.
>>
> F14 i
Hi all,
I get the following message every time I run yum [search|update|info]:
"pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum"
It is a problem of update repository and any cleaning doesn't help. I
compared the checksum of my local file and checksum of the same file
downloaded from several mir
On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I get the following message every time I run yum [search|update|info]:
>>
>> "pkgtags.sqlite.gz does not match checksum"
>>
>
On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>>
>
>>>> I get the followi
On 11/01/2010 02:04 AM, g wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 01:57 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>
>
>> The yum complains about "pkgtags.sqlite.gz". The checksum of the file
>> "pkgtags.sqlite" in the archive is the same as described in the file
>> "rep
On 11/01/2010 02:07 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 02:04 AM, g wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2010 01:57 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The yum complains about "pkgtags.sqlite.gz". The checksum of the file
>>> &quo
On 11/01/2010 01:50 AM, g wrote:
> oops...
>
> On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/01/2010 01:23 AM, g wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/01/2010 01:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
On 11/01/2010 02:12 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 01:50 AM, g wrote:
>
>> oops...
>>
>> On 11/01/2010 01:40 AM, g wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 11/01/2010 01:34 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 11/
On 11/01/2010 03:35 AM, g wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 02:17 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>
> anyway, to all of other post... kafba.
>
>
>> I am going to sleep, 2:15AM, it will be torture to get up at 6:45AM.
>> Thanks "g".
>>
> welco
On 11/01/2010 06:24 PM, g wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 04:23 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
>
>
>
>> I can't sleep
>>
> i know the feeling. but i did get some sleep. using melatonin. ;)
>
>
>
>> I use for example the following repositories:
&g
On 11/02/2010 12:54 AM, Adil Adil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to get and install fedora 12. The reason for that is that I'm
> gonna use a software that has been tested only with fedora 12.na
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
Download the installation ISO image, you can find the list of mirrors
here: h
It is a nasty marketing trick. You have 1.3X MP camera and every pixel
has three sub-pixels (red, green, blue). So the total amount of
(sub)pixels is: 3 x 1.3X ~= 5MP. Another trick is that the higher
"resolution" - understand the size of image - is artificially increased
using an interpolation
On 11/02/2010 01:11 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
It is a nasty marketing trick. You have 1.3X MP camera and every pixel
has three sub-pixels (red, green, blue). So the total amount of
(sub)pixels is: 3 x 1.3X ~= 5MP.
Of cause 3 x1.3 is not 5MP and I am going to sleep because
Another trick is
On 11/13/2010 07:27 AM, William Perkins wrote:
>
> Thank you for telling me about the Xorg log file. I should have saved the
> old log file that showed the problem, but it gets rewritten during the
> boot process.
>
No, it is not. See:
ls /var/log/Xorg.*
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On 11/12/2010 05:41 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> I would never consider using Fedora on a system where security was paramount.
> That's why I only use it on my home desktop systems.
>
>
And what do you use instead? I have never had a security problem with
Fedora.
--
users mailing list
user
It looks like a regression which happens sometimes for an older and
rarely used hardware.The driver is no longer under active development
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/orinoco/), so you should contact
the maintainer of the driver and hopefully they will have time and
needed hardware to f
On 11/27/2010 12:33 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> USB WiFi
I forgot to mention, I have Edimax EW-7711UTn USB adapter (Amazon UK)
and it works quite reliably with F14 and rpmfusion RaLink drivers.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http
On 11/28/2010 01:25 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> Thanks. I'll note that.
> I'm actually using ndiswrapper now with a Vivanco USB WLAN dongle
> (ID 0457:0163 Silicon Integrated Systems),
> which seems to be working well under Fedora-14 and Windows XP.
> But I would prefer not to use ndiswrapper if
Hi all,
I try to familiarise with [new] RPM features (4.8+). One feature is the
embedded Lua interpreter (http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/RpmLua),
however, I am struggling to find real [more advanced] examples, how it
is being used in SPECs. Please, can anybody give me some links?
Cheers,
Vac
It seems that F18 will be the first version where the recomended way of
installation will be installation of the previous version and distribution
upgrade ... :-).
Vaclav M.
On Nov 1, 2012 3:55 AM, "Junayeed Ahnaf" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm seeing that Fedora 18 has been delayed 5 times already,
Hi all,
I have a cloned GCC git repository, on PC with 1.5GB of RAM and 3GB swap.
When I run "$git gc --aggressive", I will get after few hours an error:
$ git gc --aggressive
Counting objects: 1332887, done.
Delta compression using up to 2 threads.
fatal: Out of memory, malloc failed (tried to
Hi all,
I noticed that the today's update of git brought dependency between git
and subversion. Git requires perl-Git, perl-Git depends on subversion-perl
and subversion-perl depends on subversion. It looks like that the used git
spec file doesn't reflect the changes in the latest release of git
Hi Todd,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Vaclav,
>
>
> Without looking closely, it surely appears to be an unintended bug. Those
> Git/SVN/*.pm files should be moved to the git-svn package. Please file a
> bugzilla and either Adam or I will get that fixed up.
>
>
Re
>
> Reindl,
>
> Please understand that your use of the English language comes across as
> violent and aggressive. Excessive accenting, excessive snipping, and
> excessive profanity make up a majority of your postings to Fedora
> mailing lists.
Very subjective impressionsà.
I have no problems with
33 matches
Mail list logo
