Re: sshd Authentication refused

On 7/13/2010 3:49 PM, jack craig wrote: > > > On 07/13/2010 11:16 AM, David Highley wrote: >> User home directory is auto NFS mounted and we use NIS. This works >> Fedora 12 to Fedora 12. Have you tried this: setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs1 1 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked

Re: Mounting cifs

Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that multiple dhcp daemons might cause something like what you describe. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.901

Re: Mounting cifs

On 5/26/2011 10:38 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/26/11 06:46, Rich wrote: >> Just a shot in the dark, but do you have multiple dhcp daemons running >> on the network. Your router probably has one running. I could buy that >> multiple dhcp daemons might cause something like what yo

Re: dumb question

On 1/4/2012 3:40 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 1/4/2012 12:30 AM, Steve Searle wrote: >> >> The case against extensions in this context is that the user shouldn't >> have to change if the shell script is rewritten in a different language. >> Having to change from foobar.sh to foobar.pl just bec

Fedora 20 Mate System Sounds

emes available to me. Sound works when testing using the mixer, as well as when using Chrome and netflix. Has anyone else had this problem? Rich-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: wildcards to list a group of files in sequential numerical order ?

On 11/7/2011 1:54 PM, linux guy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) > wrote: > >> Not sure that shell globbing will work here... but you could do something >> like this in bash: > > > Thanks for confirming that. I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing > someth

Re: fedora equivalent of recovery disk

On 12/12/2011 3:13 AM, Emilio Lopez wrote: >> Before I consider actually doing it, I wanted to ask if there is the >> equivalent of "a recovery disk" that I can create with k3b so, assuming >> the problem is fixable, I can reinstall without having to go back to the >> original install disk (and the

Re: fedora equivalent of recovery disk

On 12/12/2011 12:11 PM, g wrote: > On 12/12/2011 03:05 PM, Rich wrote: > <> > > >> Better than dd, use ddrescue. The -S option makes a sparse copy which >> will take up much less disk space and will be correspondingly faster. >> Also you can stop an

Re: Copying USB stick fails with device errors

On 6/7/2012 8:24 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > >>> I believe the problem is that the filesystem starts at block 4 and not >>> at the beginning, so mount can't figure out how to mount it. >> >> Use an offset, e.g. >> >> # mount -o loop,offset=4 > > Thanks, I should have thought of that. Alas, it di

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have seen a weird behavior of my DS (1.1.2). It has a very small > database (only about 2300 objects). A client performed a one-level > search retrieving the children. The server find 114 objects, but the > search was very slow: > > [06/May/2010:12:23:

Re: [389-users] Quick question about RHDS

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Not sure if this is a good place to ask. > I was just wondering what is how often a new version of RHDS is release? > The latest RHDS is 8.1, is there an estimation of when RHDS 8.2 would > be release? There should be an RHDS 8.2 release soon - contact your sales/suppor

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rich, which debugging level do you suggest? Apparently, I tried to much, > because it would crash the server constantly. Debugging levels should not crash the server - can provide more information about the crash? > For now, I go just with 8 (Connection M

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

s needed (gdb) quit Then send me /tmp/slapd.txt > -Reinhard > > -Original Message- > From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 6:04 PM > To: General disc

Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...

to the server, > although it is still running and replying to other requests > > -Reinhard > > BTW No change, when I set it to 1000 > > > -Original Message- > From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On

Re: [389-users] Does 389org expand dynamic groups?

Roberto Polli wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm playing with dynamic groups, but it seems that ldap doesn't evaluate them. > The MemberOf plugin doesn't work with dynamic groups too... > > Do I have to search them programmatically? > Yes. This feature is on our roadmap - http://directory.fedoraproject.

Re: [389-users] SASL auth problem on bind with Mac OS X 10.4

Roland Schwingel wrote: > > Hi > > > Is the ldap server configured for sasl? it would seem that the osx > > client tries with sasl and only sasl when that does not work it unbinds > > and does not try simple bind, it may see that the ldap server is showing > > sasl as a available authentication

Re: [389-users] Management Console login

Hyatt, Dan wrote: > > I have > been trying to get the 389 up. I have the management console up. But I > am getting the error > > Cannot logon because of an incorrect User ID, Incorrect password or > Directory problem > > Java.io.EOFExc

Re: [389-users] Management Console login

Hyatt, Dan wrote: > -Original Message- > From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich > Megginson > Sent: May 26, 2010 10:45 AM > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. &

Fedora 13 AdobeReader_enu nss-softokn-freebl multiple version conflict

Yesterday I installed Fedora 13, first on my laptop and then my main machine. Both are 64bit with nvidia cards. On the laptop everything went as expected, but on the big box I could not install AdobeReader_enu. When I try: yum install AdobeReader_enu I get the error message: Transaction Check

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Alpha 4

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 4 of version 1.2.6. This release contains a new replication session API, auto DN index upgrade, and several bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is an Alpha release, so it may have a few glitches,

Re: [389-users] Multi Master Replication + SSL

al port it is connecting to. > > thanks, > stephen > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Stephen Agar wrote: > > I have 2 389 servers that I want to configure in a Multi > Master setup(I

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

> I’m able to start 389-console on WinXP but cannot login; always fails > with the error below. any ideas? > C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>"C:\Program > Files\Java\jre6\bin\java" "-Djava.library.path=." -cp > "./jss4.jar;./ldapjdk.jar;./idm-console-base.jar;./idm-console-mcc.jar;./idm

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

like to do some more things like sharing folders > and create sub-admins. > > consider this as a cry for help to a stretched hand, grasping for the > mainland knowing he is almost ashore. > > Kindest regards, > Olof Nord and Thobias Nylander > ---

Re: [389-users] two guys who bit some more than we could chew...(?)

to be able to log into the 389-console and to add some > users. We would also like to do some more things like sharing folders > and create sub-admins. > > consider this as a cry for help to a stretched hand, grasping for the > mainland knowing he is almost ashore. > > Kindest regards, > Olof Nord and Thobias Nylander > &

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

PM96,768 smime3.dll > 05/10/2010 07:36 PM 159,744 softokn3.dll > 05/10/2010 07:36 PM 401,408 sqlite3.dll > 05/10/2010 07:38 PM 172,032 ssl3.dll > 26 File(s) 5,027,378 bytes >2 Dir(s) 90,234,880 byte

Re: [389-users] 389-console not working on Windows XP

Manager.get(Unknown Source) > at com.netscape.management.client.console.Console.invoke_task(Unknown > Source) > at > com.netscape.management.client.console.Console.authenticate_user(Unknown > Source) > at com.netscape.management.client.console.Console.(Unknown &

Re: no subject

Please put in a subject, even if it's "no subject", "emtpy" or some such. Otherwise it is either impossible or extremely difficult to view the message from the web archives location. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin

Re: [389-users] how to quickly recover from a corrupt database in multiple master configuration

mark benschop wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm having a problem on a CentOs Directory Server 8.1 multiple master > setup. > The database of one of the servers has been marked as corrupt and has > been brought offline by the Directory Server. Can you post any relevant error messages from the error log of

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release Candidate 1 of version 1.2.6. This release a couple of bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested for regressions and fo

Re: [389-users] how to quickly recover from a corrupt database in multiple master configuration

mark benschop wrote: > Hi Rich, > Thanks for your reply. > Please find the logging from the problems below. > The serverb55 is one of 2 servers in a multiple masters configuration > that consists of serverb55 and serverb05. > > The problem I inititially had was that I had 2 e

Re: [389-users] attribute name case sensitivity

Mike Li wrote: > Looks like the ldap server forces lower case sensitivity (or is that > set as default somewhere). When I add an attribute, it always turn all > letters to lower case. How do I make it case sensitive? What platform? What version of 389-ds-base? What attribute(s)? > > Thanks. > -

Re: [389-users] Restart of replicated servers

Mitja Mihelic( wrote: > Hi! > > We currently have the following setup. > consumer1 <-- supplier1 <---multi-master-repl---> supplier2 --> > consumer2 > > What is the correct order in which to restart directory servers so that > all replication agreements will come up OK ? > It should no

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi all, > > I am hitting an issue with reinitializing the directory database. > > Basically I have two directory servers and they're configured using > multi-master replication scheme. > > When I reinitialize the directory database, the directory became > inaccessible.

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for replying. > > Just making sure I'm using the right utility. To reinitialize the > directory, I use the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> Perl script right? Yes, if you need to restore _all_ servers from an LDIF backup

Re: [389-users] attribute name case sensitivity

cases. > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Mike Li wrote: > > Looks like the ldap server forces lower case sensitivity (or is that > > set as default somewhere). When I add an attribute, it always >

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

information. > > My LDIF backup will be imported back to the LDAP using ldif2db.pl > <http://ldif2db.pl>. > > - David > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Chun Tat David Chu > mailto:beyonddc.stor...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Thanks Rich, I'll give t

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I did some testing and it appears to be working as you expected. > The steps involve > 1) Export the directory database to a LDIF > 2) Reload the directory database > 3) Reinitialize the consumer > > I have another question. I no

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Thanks Rich, > > I did more experiment, and I noticed one of my database didn't get > reload after I ran ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> script > > My DIT has a root database and then a sub database under the root > database. When I did

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

Ns correctly, and requires 389-ds-1.2.3 (389-ds-console-1.2.3) which also has support for DN escaped values in within DNs. 389-ds-console-1.2.3 should be available from the testing repos. > > Regards. > > > 2010/6/16 Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> > >

Re: [389-users] userPassword and {kerberos}usern...@realm

Arnar Gunnarsson wrote: > I'm using the 389 DS to authenticate users agains all sorts of services > (HTTP/IMAP/OpenVPN/etc) using the userPassword attribute. > > Now, I've recently installed a kerberos server for secure authentication > and configured the 389 DS against the kerberos server, and am

Re: [389-users] restarting the 389 after a reboot

Steven Jones wrote: > Hi, > > I eventually thought thatie pin file.however I am not aware Ive set > the admin server for ssl.the actual directory server is, and has a pin > file and it startsso I'll go back and make one. > > However from the docs, starting it at the command line s

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for helping. I followed your direction and exported another > LDIF for my 2nd database but whenever I try to load it I get an error > message "ldap_add: Operations error". What's in the errors log? > > H

Re: [389-users] Directory Re-population

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I looked at both access log and error log. The access log has an > addition of ldap_add failure but the error log doesn't say anything > about the failure on loading the 2nd database. What were the exact command line arguments you

Re: [389-users] restarting the 389 after a reboot

Steven Jones wrote: > 8>< > > >> start the admin server like this: >> /usr/sbin/start-ds-admin -e debug >> > > 8>< > > Great thanks...nice output. > > > [r...@vuwunicooimm001 admin-serv]# /usr/sbin/start-ds-admin -e debug > [Thu Jun 24 13:44:55 2010] [debu

Re: SATA HDD in an external case over USB - 2 partitions

em with the exact same numbers. The drive is dead or dying. I'm hoping mine comes back enough to grab the data still on it. When it works it works without error and passes short smartctl tests. I think the disk surfaces are probably okay and it's the electronics that are almost gone. If

Re: [389-users] restarting the 389 after a reboot

Steven Jones wrote: > > 8><- > > > > This is the real problem I think - looks like you've told the > > console/admin server to use SSL to connect to the directory server, but > > you haven't specified to use port 636 > > > > 8><- > > Im not aware I did > > 8><- > > > > http://

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

we get a build of 389-ds-console 1.2.3 into epel testing? > > > 2010/6/23 Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> > > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have upgraded our test server(from version 1.2.5, > > 389-ds-bas

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

the server, edit 99user.ldif, then start up the server. > > Regards and thanks in advance. > > > 2010/6/23 Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> > > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have upgraded our test server(f

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

stead. > > Regards. > > > 2010/6/25 Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> > > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > > Hi again > > > > What will happen if I modify the schema, creating a new aattribute > > without specifying

[389-users] The 1.2.6 release will be very soon . . .

. . . but before we release to the stable repositories, we need your feedback. Please take a moment to let us know (reply to this message is fine - bodhi karma is preferred) if you have used 389-ds-base 1.2.6.rc2 and/or 389-admin 1.1.11.rc1 (and related packages) and, if so, what problems you

Re: [389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

Roberto Polli wrote: > Hi all, > our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org. > > It seems that there are some issues in admin-server, which have been deeply > investigated by the Sabayon maintainer. > > Those issues could be related to the latest versions of the librari

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release Candidate 3 of version 1.2.6. This release has a few bug fixes. ***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested for regressions and for ne

Re: [389-users] Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org

Fabio Erculiani wrote: > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Roberto Polli wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org. >>> >>> It seems that there are s

Re: [389-users] Problems compiling svrcore

Stefan-Michael Guenther wrote: > Hi, > > >> --with-nss=/usr/src/mozilla/security/nss/lib/nss.h >>> --with-nss=/usr/src/mozilla/security/nss/lib/ >> I think you mean >> --with-nss-inc=/path/to/directory/containing/nss *.h files >> --with-nss-lib=/path/to/directory/containing/nss *.so files >> >> Can

Re: [389-users] Slow logging

Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: > Hi > In my lab system I am seeing quite a long delay(10+seconds) between the > actual ldap request and the logging of the request in the access log. Is this > normal behavior? Yes. By default, the access log is buffered. > and can it be speeded up? Yes. ldapmodify -x

Re: [389-users] Problems compiling svrcore

Stefan-Michael Guenther wrote: > Hi, > >>> http://www.in-put.de/config.log (33KB) >> Thanks. Sorry, I meant config.log, not config.status. >> >> This is your configure command: >> >> $ ./configure --with-nss-inc=/usr/include/ --with-nss-lib=/usr/lib/nss >> --with-nspr-inc=/usr/local/include/nspr/ -

Re: [389-users] Modify dse.ldif using commands

changing this parameter over LDAP takes effect immediately, no > restart required. Maybe you were thinking of other parameters? > > > On 6/21/2010 5:07 AM, Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: >> OK, I'll take a look. >> >> Thanks. >> >

Re: [389-users] Error initializing server

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi > > I am having trouble initializaing a server. That server has some > replicas in r/o mode, as hub, and one as multimaster. When I try to > initialize the multimaster database of this server from another server > that has also that database in multimaster mode,

Re: [389-users] 389 DS 1.2.5 on RHEL VM

Barry Sitompul wrote: > Hi All, > > > Thanks for the replies! > > I am running the DS on a RHEL 5.5 x86_64 VM. > > It's got 8GB of RAM and out of that I allocated 600MB for the LDBM > plugin cache. I have four backend databases so does it mean 600 x 4 = > 2.4GB in total? Plus 3.8GB in total fo

Re: [389-users] Error initializing server

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi > > 2010/7/14 Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> > > Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am having trouble initializaing a server. That server has some > > replicas in r/o mod

Re: [389-users] Host based ACI and LDAPI

Deyan Stoykov wrote: > Hi! > > I'm running centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5. When I set up a list of allowed hosts > for an ACI, in addition to non-matching hosts, requests via LDAPI are > rejected as well. This does make sense, but is there a way to allow > connections from a list of remote hosts and via

Re: [389-users] Host based ACI and LDAPI

Deyan Stoykov wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Deyan Stoykov wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm running centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5. When I set up a list of allowed hosts >>> for an ACI, in addition to non-matching hosts, requests via LD

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3

Aaron Hagopian wrote: > I filed a bug per Rich: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616206 > > > How did you create the ldif file in > "/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-/ldif/"? Did you move the ldif > file there from elsewhere on your system? That could

Re: [389-users] Windows Replication Agreement Help

--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: > - Original Message - > >> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 07:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: >> >>> John A. Sullivan III wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 04:15 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: >>&g

Re: [389-users] Windows Replication Agreement Help

--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: > - Original Message - > >> --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: >> >>> - Original Message - >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 07:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: [389-users] Large amount of users in Directory causes timeouts on client login.

Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: > Hi > I have just created 20 000 users each with a private group on two masters 10 > 000 on each master, with the purpose of testing replication between two > masters. > > I did not observe any errors in access log and there is no errors logged in > the error log for e

Re: [389-users] Directory Sync rename

James Roman wrote: > We have what appears to be a single replication operation holding up all > subsequent replication changes. We had a user who was added to our > Active Directory with an incorrect name. The record was then synced down > to our 389 DS server/FreeIPA. When the problem was disco

Re: [389-users] Multiple sync aggrements between Ad and DS?

Theodotos Andreou wrote: > Guys I' ve seen this warning on the 8.1 Administration Guide: > > WARNING > There can only be a single sync agreement between the Directory Server > environment and the Active Directory environment. Multiple sync > agreements to the same Active Directory domain can create

Re: [389-users] Multiple sync aggrements between Ad and DS?

Theodotos Andreou wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for the reply! > > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 08:19 -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Theodotos Andreou wrote: >> >>> Guys I' ve seen this warning on the 8.1 Administration Guide: >>> >

Re: How to move my / partition

> I want to move the / partition on a (very ancient) Fedora-12 desktop > from one SCSI disk to another (/dev/sdb3 to /dev/sda6), > because the second disk is showing some signs of sickness. > > Is there any safe way of doing this while the machine is running? > Unfortunately the CD drive does not

Re: [389-users] yum repository and 389 Directory Server 1.2.5

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a quick question. I am using Fedora 12 and just installed 389 > Directory Server yesterday. > > I followed the instruction on the yum installation guide, > http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Install_Guide. > - yum install 389-ds > > I am not su

Re: [389-users] Multi-Master Replication doesn't work after a while

Fabio Isgrò wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm writing this mail to report a strange behavior in 389-ds when > configured as MultiMasterReplication. > > The scenario is very simple an application use it as authentication > base, the access to ldap server is regulated by a software load balancer > with two no

Re: where is my remaining space ????

>> First, most (all?) hard drive manufacturers define 1gb as 1000mb. >> In reality, 1gb is 1024mb. Therefore, a hard drive that is sold as >> a 320gb > In fact they are giving you more than you asked for. Giga is a prefix > for 10^x series. So really they should be giving you 10 bytes Th

Re: [389-users] CentOS DS and IP address

Branimir wrote: > Hi list! > > just one question (maybe silly one, but I have to be sure). Soon, we > will change the IP address of one of our servers running CentOS DS. Are > there any DS configuration files (or file) that need to be changed > accordingly? I took a look at /etc/dirsrv/slapd-ins

Re: [389-users] TinyCA2 & 389-DS

Jeff Moody wrote: > I'm trying to set up two 389 Directory Services servers in a replication > scenario. I can do this quite easily without any SSL/TLS setup. > > In an effort to improve the security of our environment, I would like to get > TLS configured so that this replication (and all LDAP a

Re: [389-users] FDS oid control for SunDS feature

Charles Gilbert wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have been struggling with this one for a while. > > In switching to 389, I am trying to figure out how to get my Solaris > clients working with account management and ssh keys. SunDS 5.? has > an oid control that allows for account management and ssh k

Re: [389-users] Howto determine the last time an account was bound?

Ryan Braun [ADS] wrote: > Is there an operational attribute or some other way to determine when the > last > time an account was used to bind to the server (or any server in a MMR > setup). Basically looking to find out the last time an account performed a > bind operation to test for account

Re: [389-users] Directory Server OID control for passwordless logins of Solaris Clients

Charles Gilbert wrote: > > > This is from the Sun website about their pam_ldap module: > > > > Configuring PAM to Use LDAP server_policy > > To configure PAM to use LDAP server_policy, follow the sample in > Example pam_conf file for pam_ldap Configured for Account Management >

Re: [389-users] is anybody having problems with latest selinux policy update in F12?

me wrote: > hi Rich > do you know why it all broke so suddenly with latest update for base policy? > yes - miscommuncation between the 389 team and the selinux team > for some users it could be kind of a disaster, if now base policy is > lacking rules for 389 > then some

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Alpha 2

The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 2 of version 1.2.6. This release contains some major new features - Subtree Rename, SELinux policy, Matching Rules - as well as many bug fixes. NOTE: Packages for Enterprise Linux are available from EPEL. We will no longer have a sep

Re: [389-users] Replication error acquiring replica: permission denied error code 3

Sean Carolan wrote: > I'm attempting to get single-master replication working but am stuck > with this cryptic "error code 3". Are there detailed descriptions of > the error codes somewhere? > It depends. Can you post the full error message? > I followed the directions on this page to a T, but

Re: [389-users] Busy replica when deleting replication conflict

Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: > Hi all > > I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking > fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some > replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them > manually, and now the databases in the other se

Re: [389-users] modifying the server of the sync Agreement

jean-Noël Chardron wrote: > hello, > > In my company, the AD server that is sync with a 389 directory server > will be changed by a new one (because the actual AD is used and old and > not eternal) > In the documentation > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Windows_Sync.html

Re: [389-users] modifying the server of the sync Agreement

jean-Noël Chardron wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: > >> jean-Noël Chardron wrote: >> >> >>> hello, >>> >>> In my company, the AD server that is sync with a 389 directory server >>> will be changed by a new one (because th

Re: [389-users] slapd didn't close connection and get into CLOSE_WAIT state

Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for your explanation. > > I know that #567429 is a low priority bug, but is there a time frame > or which version of 389-DS will have a fix for this bug? Probably 1.2.6 or 1.2.7 final release. Should show up in an alpha rele

Re: [389-users] Migration Issues With Admin Server LDIF Import

Brian Provenzano wrote: > I'm still on the road to trying to migrate from FDS 1.0.4 to 389 DS > 1.2.5. Thanks to Rich's help yesterday in a previous thread (Cross > Migration Problem From FDS 1.0.x to 386 Directory Server) I was able > to fix an import issue with an existing ldif schema (presen

Re: [389-users] Migration Issues With Admin Server LDIF Import

r issue - conflict with source ldif). > > -run the migration script as follows: ./migrate-ds-admin.pl > <http://migrate-ds-admin.pl> --oldsroot /tmp/fedora-ds --actualsroot > /opt/fedora-ds General.ConfigDirectoryAdminPwd='mypassword' What is the FQDN of the ol

Re: [389-users] importing large subtree crashes ns-slapd

Christopher Wood wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:06:31PM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Christopher Wood wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:30:19PM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Christopher W

Re: [389-users] Migration Issues With Admin Server LDIF Import

@gmail.com>> wrote: > > The FQDN look the fine to me. I tried to be very careful about > this pitfall. > > NEW server: > # hostname --fqdn > ldap.mcs.local > > OLD server: > #hostname --fqdn > ldap.mcs.local > > > O

Re: [389-users] importing large subtree crashes ns-slapd

Christopher Wood wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:57:08PM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Christopher Wood wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:06:31PM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Christopher Wood wro

Re: [389-users] Server side sort not using index

j...@scusting.com wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed in our directory server logs a number of queries which are not > using indexes, and this appears to be down to sorting of the query being > done the server side: > > - Server sorted- > conn=1433 op=1 SRCH base="o=blah.com" scope=2 > fi

Re: [389-users] Tombstones not deleting

j...@scusting.com wrote: > I have noticed on my Fedora consumers there appear to be quite a few > tombstones going back months even thought the Purge delay is set to a week: > > ldapsearch -x -b "cn=mapping tree,cn=config" -D "cn=Directory Manager" > -W cn=replica nsds5ReplicaPurgeDelay > # replica

Re: [389-users] Tombstones not deleting

j...@scusting.com wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: > >> j...@scusting.com wrote: >> >> >>> I have noticed on my Fedora consumers there appear to be quite a few >>> tombstones going back months even thought the Purge delay is set to a week: &g

Re: [389-users] How to rename DIT?

John A. Sullivan III wrote: > Hello, all. We've recently undergone a corporate name and domain > change, let's say from oldname.biz to newname.com. Consequently, we > need to rename the top level of our LDAP structure. We installed CentOS > Directory Server 8.1 into dc=oldname,dc=biz and now nee

Re: [389-users] How to rename DIT?

John A. Sullivan III wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 17:05 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> John A. Sullivan III wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:28 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> John A. Sullivan II

Re: [389-users] Unintended cert mapping happening

John A. Sullivan III wrote: > Hello, all. We are experiencing a weird problem and have not been able > to fix it. We have just renamed the top level of our tree from > dc=old,dc=biz to dc=new,dc=com. All went very well (well, very well > until we also changed the certificates and keys to be from

Re: [389-users] Replica has no update vector.

Techie wrote: > Hi, > > I have Winsync agreements simply to pull accounts from AD. No pass > sync configured, nothing pushed from Directory Server to AD, simply > pulling account info from AD to Directory Server with no password. > > I did full synchronization to pull accounts from AD and it was >

Re: [389-users] Replica has no update vector.

Techie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Techie wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have Winsync agreements simply to pull accounts from AD. No pass >>> sync configured, nothing pushed from Directory Se

Re: [389-users] Replica has no update vector.

Techie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Techie wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Techie wrote: >>>> >>>> &g

Re: [389-users] changelogdb has gotten large...

Hartmann, Tim wrote: > Hi, > > I've run into a situation where one of the files in > /var/lib/dirsrv//changelogdb has grown almost as large as the > partition it's on. In my directory server configs, I noticed I was keeping > an unlimited changelog, so I set that to what seems like a reasonab

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >