On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 09:53 -0600, JD wrote:
> Fedora keeps old revisions of SW for EOL'ed releases.
>
> Does rpmfusion have a link for these EOL'ed releases?
http://archive.rpmfusion.org/
Found the link here: https://lisas.de/~adrian/?p=1321
Jonathan
___
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 11:02 -0600, JD wrote:
>
> On 09/15/2018 10:38 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 09:53 -0600, JD wrote:
> > > Fedora keeps old revisions of SW for EOL'ed releases.
> > >
> > > Does rpmfusion have a l
I don't have an NVME drive, but I came across this the other day:
https://community.wd.com/t/linux-support-for-wd-black-nvme-2018/225446/8
I have no idea what brand your NVME drive is, but perhaps this will
help.
Jonathan
On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 12:54 -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> And this pro
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:16 -0400, Jesse Palser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Fedora 13 Release Candidate # 2 32bit.
> Where is OpenOffice in this release?
yum install openoffice.org-writer openoffice.org-calc \
openoffice.org-impress
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:12 -0400, Jesse Palser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is OpenOffice not a default program ?
I believe it's because there's limited space on the LiveCD, and
OpenOffice pushes it over the top.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users ma
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:59 +0300, Dj YB wrote:
> hello,
>
> since installation all updates had to be downloaded almost entirely and not
> used the benefit of delta's
> is anyone else seeing this problem or is something temporary in the repos?
> how could I investigate the source of the problem i
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Maybe, but netgear doesn't seem to have the iso files for fedora 2 on their
> open source download site, so it might be a bit difficult for someone
> wanting to replicate their development environment to do it.
>
> (Unless maybe there is a ar
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 03:14 -0500, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I've made available DVD deltaisos for Fedora 12 -> Fedora Unity 20100202
> 12 (both i386 and x86_64) at
>
> http://thepiratebay.org/user/andre14965/
>
> i386:
> Fraction of full ISO size: 14.6%
> applydeltaiso's approximate running time:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 01:39 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:48 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
> > what about this missing space ...
> > where is it ? )
>
> The space you're looking for doesn't exist, for two reasons:
>
> First, most (all?) hard drive manufacturers define 1gb as 1000mb.
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 14:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> It appears that Mozilla upstream is going to force our hand here.
> Apparently, Mozilla declared Firefox 4 EOL alongside the release of
> Firefox 5 [1].
>
> This is going to cause a lot of pain, especially with regards to
> extensions.
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 01:49 -0400, David wrote:
> Is it possible to make a deltaiso without having both the older ISO and
> the Newer ISO on a local system.
>
> Example. Fedora-14-Alpha-x86_64-Live.iso was downloaded. A
> Fedora-14-Alpha-2-x86_64-Live.iso is availible for download.
>
> Can a del
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 06:51 -0400, David wrote:
> On 8/29/2010 2:30 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 01:49 -0400, David wrote:
> >> Is it possible to make a deltaiso without having both the older ISO and
> >> the Newer ISO on a local system.
> >
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:29 -0400, David wrote:
> I think that I understand the principal behind this. Disk space nor
> bandwidth are not problems for me. I was thinking of others that might
> have a bandwidth/byte counter problem.
>
> Explain to me just how downloading only a part of the new ISO,
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 21:56 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> The Fedora project (or an interested user) creates the deltaiso.
To clarify, this is theoretical. The Fedora project is *not* creating
official deltaisos right now. However, any deltaiso should build into a
byte-for-byte copy of
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 06:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> The delta rpms may be the problem but also the solution.
The deltarpms are not the problem. If the deltarpm doesn't build to a
byte-for-byte copy of the original rpm, the signature won't match and
yum will refuse to install it.
Jonathan
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 23:09 +0200, Dj YB wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my internet connection is pay per traffic so I prefer to use deltas when
> possible.
> Is it possible to know before you say 'yes' to the update process, what
> packages are going to be fully downloaded and what packages have deltas?
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:52 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> At the very least, yum should provide an estimate of the delta download
> size *before* the user is presented with the option for allowing
> download to begin.
Yum-presto did originally do this, but only by doing incredibly hackish
things t
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 19:09 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> The best place files an RFE, for stuff in your wish list:
> http://yum.baseurl.org/
>
> They have a mailing list and roadmap.
Yum-presto isn't currently part of yum. It's a plugin. If you want to
file an RFE, either use
https://fedorahos
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-algorithms/
> Read the article and parts of the thesis.
> So, the final version of the algorithm
> still remains with the University of Ox
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 23:06 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 10:58 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 22:33 -0700, JD wrote:
> >> On 04/15/2011 09:04 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> >>> http://cedarandthistle.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/on-binary-delta-alg
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:05 +, Ron Yorston wrote:
> Is there a problem with openoffice.org and delta RPMs? I've just
> done a yum update on F14 and all the OOo packages were downloaded in
> their entirety, whereas about 30 others came in as deltas. And it's
> not like OOo is small. And this
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
> Hello all..
>
> We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
> version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed on F14 based systems with
> 4.8.1.. We are creating the delta RPM packages on the F14 system with
> makede
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:04 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
>
> On 01/30/2011 02:35 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
> >> Hello all..
> >>
> >> We have some RPM packages which have been built on a syste
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 17:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote:
> >
> >> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always
> >> ended up in the right folder.
> >>
> >
> > Very likely because the
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:55 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear fellow Fedora users,
>
> Deltarpms does help a little bit with many packages, but the kernel is
> not one of them :(
>
> kernel-devel, kernel-headers, kernel-firmware, etc do work though, how
> come kernel package is not the same?
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 03:11 -0800, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Saturday 23 January 2010 11:45 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > Basically, the kernel now has a 20MB initramfs included that is full of
> > 0's. When you install the kernel, it automatically generates an
> > initra
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 11:24 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Has anyone found a way to:
> journalctl | grep "last 10 minutes"
journalctl --since -600
Jonathan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On 06/09/2014 04:15 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a
very short and simple survey. Let your o
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:37 +0530, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> I used the standard Fedora gui interface to find the printer on my
> network, choose IPP, and follow all the prompts to find the printer
> make
> and model, and said yes to the recommended driver, screenshot here:
> https://dl.dropboxuserconten
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 19:38 -0800, Dave Close wrote:
> I've been trying to get a new working PXE installation for F23 and it
> isn't working. I just noticed what might be the problem. Although
> I downloaded the vmlinuz and initrd.img from the F23 server
> version archive, when the installation sta
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 21:48 -0500, Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I had F17 and updated it last week to F18. It was perfectly stable
> and I had no problems with Gnome.
>
>I did a fresh install of F18 (fresh drive) on Sunday and since then
> Gnome 3 has locked up hard on me six times (thre
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> > but is wrong with evince.
> > The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong charact
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:32 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> So what is the solution ?
>
> I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
> a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
>
> Thank.
I've figured it out. I had wine-symbol-fonts installed, which provid
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Humm,
>
> removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
> and rootplot, root etc
> I am not sure about such a soluton!!
I know nothing about root (aside from the fact that its documentation
subpackage is ridiculously large), but "yum r
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 16:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:14 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at a4:01 PM, Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> >> Does anyone know exactly what's happening during the rebuild? I
> >> understand from light documentation how d
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 14:53 -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> When a new Fedora is released, I immediately fetch the Live Xfce
> Spin .iso. As a Gnome hater, I want to avoid that entrapment.
> I've always found Xfce perfectly suited for me.
>
> This crucial piece of the release is missing at all
On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 20:24 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 1/25/19 6:45 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Is there a quicker way to protect my data when I give the drives away,
> > other than smashing the drives to bits?
>
> The quickest would be to encrypt the drives from the beginning. When yo
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 18:54 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/1/19 5:27 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On Friday, May 31, 2019 11:05:20 PM EDT Tim via users wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Garry Williams wrote:
> > > > But, of course, the issue is why this happens in the first plac
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2015-06-19 16:29, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 06/19/2015 01:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > > I'm increasingly unconvinced that it has anything whatsoever to
> > > do with
> > > X. More like it can't start a login session. I'd guess that
On 06/23/2014 12:49 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I undertook a search for the string blueray in both yum and
dnf and both, in my view, behaved strangely.
From yum I received the following messages:
yum search Blueray
This doesn't deal with yum/dnf messages, but if you're lo
Not sure why it's not enabled, but I would suggest opening a bug report
at
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&component=xbmc.
Jonathan
On 10/22/2014 07:47 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
XBMC for fedora as supplied by the RPM-fusion respository appears to not
have support f
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:22 +, Paul Smith wrote:
> I have installed
>
> yum install gstreamer*
>
> and tried several MP3 without any success. On F14 all these MP3 files
> could be played with Totem.
FWIW, when I upgraded from F15 to F16, I was unable to play *any* media
through Totem (despit
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 19:44 +, Paul Smith wrote:
> It is working now -- thanks for your help!
>
> Paul
You're welcome
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 12:44 -0600, JD wrote:
> # yum -y update
> Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, downloadonly, etckeeper,
> langpacks, presto, priorities, product-id, refresh-packagekit,
>: subscription-manager
> Updating certificate-based repositories.
> Unable to read cons
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 19:24 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Jonathan Dieter lesbg.com> writes:
>
> > Anyhow, a quick check in yum shows that both product-id and
> > subscription-manager aren't in the Fedora repositories. Removing them
> > (again, assuming you&#x
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:00 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I let it sit powered off for a while and tried rebooting running just
> on battery, and this time it got past where it failed previously.
> This time it ran file system checks on the various file systems, but
> for some reason it also decid
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 18:33 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I can assure you, I am not manually modifying anything installed by
> those packages to cause this mismatch. I do notice they are all
> 32 bit packages, but I'm running 64 bit. Is yum trying to apply
> a 64 bit delta to a 32 bit package or som
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 08:55 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 12:36:25 +0300
> Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > I believe that's exactly what yum is doing. Now that yum-presto has
> > been merged into yum for Fedora 19, your best bet would be to file a
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 00:55 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 14 out of 118 - who cares?
>
> so there was some invalid delta-files - that's why yum is designed
> to fall back to the ordinary full RPM in such cases
> > Should I file a bugzilla against yum (or something else)?
>
> clearly: NO
The i
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Jerome Yanga wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
>
> > I have tried many configs and have failed to pxe boot a live Fedora 19 cd.
> > I need help in the boot parameters. Here is my current one.
> >
> > LABEL fedora_x86_64_19
> > MENU
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> Question for the repo managers,
>
> Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g:
> This excerpt from the update this morning:
>
> > /var/cache/dnf/updates-7fc4c739b3909d9f/packages/selinux-policy-
> > targeted-3.14.4-46
51 matches
Mail list logo
