Re: F12: Yum - network disconnects spins it's wheels.

On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > On 02/25/2010 03:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> >> >>> On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Daniel B. Thu

Re: F12: Yum - network disconnects spins it's wheels.

On 02/25/2010 05:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > >> On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> >> >>> Yes. I tried it with and without. Problems are the same. Seems to >>> me it is a yum problem, but I am specul

F12: LiveCD & gparted

I thought I'd make a note of this here. When booting from F12 LiveCD, yum install gparted downloads fine, but then when one wants to reformat a [ext4] partition, it barfs quite badly - something about using one of gparted libraries. It corrupts the tables. Interestingly, doing an fsck on that p

Re: F12: Yum - network disconnects spins it's wheels.

On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Tony Nelson wrote: > >> On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote: >> ... >> >> >>> I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol >>> would interact to "smack" an imap connection. >>> >>> To me, based on your observations, I

Re: F12: Yum - network disconnects spins it's wheels.

On 02/26/2010 03:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > >> On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> >>> Tony Nelson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrot

Re: F12: Yum - network disconnects spins it's wheels.

On 02/26/2010 03:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Daniel B. Thurman wrote: On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Tony Nelson wrote: On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote: ... I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol would int

F11: Latest Sagator update blew up.

FWIW, here is the sagator update problem: Running Transaction Installing : sagator-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch 1/4 Error unpacking rpm package sagator-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/sagator: cpio: lsetfilecon Installing

F12: .gvfs is no longer dynamic?

I have once was able to have a fully active remote network connection to a .gvfs mounted filesystem from which I could do a 'tail -f /file.log, but now, it does not work. It works on F9, 10, and I am not sure about F11, but definitely sure that F12 does not. Has this been reported before, is thi

Re: Dump/Restore Errors

On 03/04/2010 04:39 AM, John Austin wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, John Austin wrote: >> >> >>> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:06:11 + >>> From: John Austin >>> Reply-To: j...@ee.port.ac.uk, >>> Community support for Fedora users >>> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Subject: Dump/Rest

Re: SELinux Troubleshooter

On 03/04/2010 12:41 PM, Fred Williams wrote: > First time posting to here, so forgive me any slight mistakes. > In the past, where I've been inexperienced with an SELinux setup, I > kept telling the troubleshooter to ignore alerts, rather than doing > something about them and having them bother m

Re: F-12 yum update error -

On 03/05/2010 06:42 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > . > The following extracted from this morning's yum update of this F-12 system.: > > Updating : > ModemManager-0.3-2.git20100211.fc12.x86_64 12/38 > Updating : > selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-92.fc12.noa

F12: Kernel dump.

ABRT has reported several kernel dumps and I was not able to get the report sent, so I deleted the report entries and moved on. However, I was perusing the /var/log/message log file and found the following but do not know what to make of it, perhaps you might know? Mar 4 15:05:22 kernel: -

Re: F12: Kernel dump.

On 03/05/2010 08:43 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:35 -0800, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > >> ABRT has reported several kernel dumps and >> I was not able to get the report sent, so I deleted >> the report entries and moved on. >> >>

Re: F12: .gvfs is no longer dynamic?

On 03/02/2010 01:45 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > I have once was able to have a fully active remote > network connection to a .gvfs mounted filesystem from > which I could do a 'tail -f/file.log, but > now, it does not work. It works on F9, 10, and I am not > sure about F11,

F12: gparted & mtab

Has anyone seen the following entries in /etc/mtab: /etc/pki/dnssec-keys /var/named/chroot/etc/pki/dnssec-keys none rw,bind 0 0 /etc/rndc.key /var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key none rw,bind 0 0 /usr/lib/bind /var/named/chroot/usr/lib/bind none rw,bind 0 0 These entries was discovered when I was usin

Re: Problem with apache virtual host in new fedora 12 installation

On 03/10/2010 07:39 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > On 03/10/2010 06:30 PM, Richard Cahilig wrote: > >> Yes. The user apache able to access /home/user. I even tried to changed >> the owership to user apache and group apache but I still have error 403. >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Steven Ste

Re: Mail clients - which way forward?

On 03/13/2010 11:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > Even though the local storage is in mbox format which I dislike (I far > prefer maildir), I don't need it since I run a local dovecot imap > server on each machine and run filters to copy mail to the local imap > store which then also has the advantage

Re: Mail clients - which way forward?

On 03/13/2010 12:25 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > On 03/13/2010 11:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > >> Even though the local storage is in mbox format which I dislike (I far >> prefer maildir), I don't need it since I run a local dovecot imap >> server on each machine

Re: [OT] Deafening silence

On 03/14/2010 10:37 PM, Roger wrote: > On 03/14/2010 09:58 AM, Craig White wrote: > >> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 17:21 -0500, Marcel Rieux wrote: >> >> >>> Honestly, I never thought that I'd find this kind of communist planned >>> economy reasoning within the advocates of a company listed on

Re: Problem after update

On 03/14/2010 08:38 AM, ka1ifq wrote: > "On 12:36:44 pm Steve Searle said" > >> Around 05:33pm on Friday, March 12, 2010 (UK time), ka1ifq scrawled: >> >>> What is the correct way to get this back working short of a >>> reload (where I will loose all my program info)? >>>

Re: [OT] Deafening silence

On 03/15/2010 07:10 AM, Roger wrote: > well I've found the selinux list to be a much better place to get help > >> with selinux stuff than this list but I would expect that if you had put >> drupal stuff into /var/www and made a soft link in /home to that >> directory you would have not had any

Re: Troubles starting fetchmail from init scripts

On 03/19/2010 08:53 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 14:39 -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 14:08 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 15:02 -0500, Steven Stern wrote: >>> On 03/19/2010 02:52 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan w

Re: Evolution and GPG signing?

On 03/21/2010 02:31 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > On 03/21/2010 11:12 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Michael Miles wrote: >> >> >> >>> This is how I solved my Evolution problem... Use Thunderbird >>> >>> >>> >> Well I do use Thunderbird - but it a

Re: firefox profile synchronized w. unison cannot save anything

On 03/23/2010 10:01 PM, Vitorio Okio wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote: > > >> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each >> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora. >> >> I created "shared" profile on each sy

Re: Where's Fedora Security Spin ISO

On 03/26/2010 12:05 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote: > Am 26.03.2010 15:44, schrieb Athmane Madjoudj: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone; >>> >>> I'm very interested in Fedora Security Lab/Spin because i dislike >>> backtrack 4 after the switch fr

Re: Where's Fedora Security Spin ISO

On 03/26/2010 12:13 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote: > Am 26.03.2010 17:10, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: > >> Theoretically this should now work without putting SELinux in permissive >> mode. If it requires this, it is a bug. >> > As far as I know, it will give an error

Re: Where's Fedora Security Spin ISO

On 03/26/2010 12:19 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote: > Am 26.03.2010 17:15, schrieb Athmane Madjoudj: > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Julian Aloofi >> wrote: >> >>> Am 26.03.2010 15:44, schrieb Athmane Madjoudj: >>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wro

Re: F12 crash

On 03/30/2010 12:39 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > --- On Mon, 3/29/10, suvayu ali wrote: > > >> On 29 March 2010 17:44, Patrick >> Bartek >> wrote: >> >>> ... At the first boot, before updating, disable >>> >> selinux, then in the terminal ... >> >>> >> Any particular

F12: /var/run/utmp: what is it for?

Is /var/run/utmp supposed to contain anything? I note that for some reason or another selinux attempts to read or write in this area and I fail to understand what it is used for. This directory contains nothing in it. Yes, I posted the specific avc denial in selinux group and could setup a poli

Re: F12: /var/run/utmp: what is it for?

On 03/30/2010 11:43 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > Is /var/run/utmp supposed to contain anything? > > I note that for some reason or another selinux attempts > to read or write in this area and I fail to understand what > it is used for. This directory contains nothing in it. &g

Re: F12: /var/run/utmp: what is it for?

On 03/30/2010 09:00 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 03/30/2010 11:43 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> Is /var/run/utmp supposed to contain anything? >> >> I note that for some reason or another selinux attempts >> to read or write in this area and I fail to understand wh

Re: Amarok 2.3: how to change playlist order

On 04/06/2010 06:21 AM, Andrea wrote: > On 02/04/10 15:40, Andrea wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In Amarok 2.3 Fedora 11 I don't seem to be able to rearrange the order of >> songs in the playlist. >> >> On the right side of the screen there is the playlist of songs currently >> played. >> When I try to

Re: Clamav

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/15/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > How on earth do I set this up to get virus definitions that selinux > won't jump all over > > I just want email scanned out and in > > I tried the latest 96 could only find i686 rpm for clamav, clamd, f

Re: Clamav

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/15/2010 05:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > On 04/15/2010 01:09 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 04/15/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > >>>> How on earth do I set this up to get virus definitions that selinux >

F12: Cannot drag/drop Firefox URL to desktop as a link

I used to drag and drop FF URL onto the desktop but as it is, it creates the index.php file. Is this a known problem? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedo

Re: F12: Cannot drag/drop Firefox URL to desktop as a link

On 04/17/2010 09:26 PM, Hiisi wrote: > 2010/4/17 Daniel B. Thurman : > >> I used to drag and drop FF URL onto the desktop but >> as it is, it creates the index.php file. >> >> Is this a known problem? >> > Which page? Give as the URL. On my F12 it w

Re: Clamav

On 04/15/2010 12:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 12:22 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > >> I have removed all and I will wait for proper instruction as I really >> do not know enough about this OS >> > Given that you say so yourself, the logical question is "why do yo

Re: Gnome shell and NVidia binary drivers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/02/2011 07:50 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Pasha R wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Volovics >> wrote: > >>> So can their be some kind of conflict between the nvidia drivers an

Re: F13->F14 upgrade + relabel = logins hosed: entrypoint access denied

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/31/2011 05:17 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote: > I just tried to upgrade a F13 system to F14 using preupgrade. > It seemed to go well, but I was getting a lot of AVC denials for NM > and polkitd, and NM wasn't working properly. So I tried a 'touch > /.au

Re: Gnome shell and NVidia binary drivers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/02/2011 09:08 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:56:37AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Alexander Volovics >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: LibreOffice and Evolution will not print

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2011 01:04 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 06:16 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >> I am still laboring over the fact that LibreOffice and Evolution and >> gedit will not allow me to print. If it was just one of them I would n

Re: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/colord from getattr access on the file /usr/local/Brother/sane/models3/ext4.ini.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/06/2011 08:41 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/06/2011 08:19 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >> SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/colord from getattr access on the file >> /usr/local/Brother/sane/models3/ext4.ini. > > So, you've installed a package

Re: LibreOffice and Evolution will not print

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/06/2011 02:51 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 06/06/2011 08:07 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> Please do not suggest to turn SELinux off at boot everytime something >> goes wrong on a Fedora System. As root you can turn SELinux into >

Re: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/gnome-session-check-accelerated-helper from 'read, write' accesses on the chr_file nvidiactl.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/gnome-session-check-accelerated-helper > from 'read, write' accesses on the chr_file nvidiactl. > > * Plugin device (91.4 confidence) suggests ***

Re: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/colord from getattr access on the file /usr/local/Brother/sane/models3/ext4.ini.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/2011 09:47 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/colord from getattr access on the file > /usr/local/Brother/sane/models3/ext4.ini. > > * Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests **

Re: outdated Tor version in Fedora (missing security fixes)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/10/2011 11:38 PM, Fennix wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Christoph A. > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 06/10/2011 06:28 PM, Fennix wrote: > > As to the SEL

Re: dependancy problem with selinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2011 09:04 AM, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I tried to run the selinux system manager from the menu administration > and it failed > > So I tried to run it from a terminal: > > /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-seli

Re: Serious problem: boot + systemd + luks + selinux + autorelabel = poop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2011 10:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > Sure could use some experts to help me fix this. touching /.autorelabel > on F15 leads to a horrible situation. > > Doing this seems to fail because /run is read-only - and so autorelabel > never comple

Re: Serious problem: boot + systemd + luks + selinux + autorelabel = poop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/2011 02:17 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/22/2011 02:05 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> Boot with enforcing=0 Should allow you to complete the relabel and >> remove /.autorelabel >> >> I would then login an

Re: frozen gnome 3 desktop

On 06/24/2011 11:18 AM, L wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak > wrote: > After upgraded to fedora 15, most are working well. The gnome 3 > desktop are weired. It frequently freeze, not responding to mouse or > keyboard. I have to login a virtual term (alt

Re: Skype on Fedora 14

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/27/2011 03:23 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > Has anyone had any luck running Skype on Fedora 14 86_x64. It installs > just fine but, when I try to launch it nothing happens! > > I get nothing in messages or demesg to show it even attempted to > l

Re: Serious problem: boot + systemd + luks + selinux + autorelabel = poop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/26/2011 11:08 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/26/2011 10:52 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> No module named GTKIO > > Seems to be this bug: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715373 > > However that is talking about rawhide -

Re: backup copy of F14 boots, but can't login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/28/2011 07:30 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Monday, June 27, 2011 04:41:43 PM jackson byers wrote: >> My backup copy of F14 boots, all looks normal, >> boot messages all "OK" >> >> but then I can't login: after entering my password >> the screen r

Re: gnu linux update question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/28/2011 01:49 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/28/2011 12:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> >> After updating, I always run needs-restarting to see what running >> processes are affected. I'm surprised more people don't seem to know >> ab

Re: backup copy of F14 boots, but can't login

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/28/2011 02:41 PM, jackson byers wrote: > thanks for all of the responses > to Tim: sticky bits on /tmp are set > to Ed Greshko: I do not see 'authentication failure', the login screen > just recycles > > to Kam Leo, others: I can't get runle

Bash: (foo==0)?foo=1:foo=0 valid?

I seem to forget my shell programming but is the following statement valid? ($foo==0)?foo=1:foo=0 I thought it was called the tristate conditional operator but in any case I could not find it in google. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription

Re: Bash: (foo==0)?foo=1:foo=0 valid?

On 07/02/2011 11:30 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 07/02/2011 12:45 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> I seem to forget my shell programming >> but is the following statement valid? >> >> ($foo==0)?foo=1:foo=0 >> >> I thought it was called the tristate conditio

Re: Bash: (foo==0)?foo=1:foo=0 valid?

On 07/02/2011 02:15 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 07/02/2011 02:11 PM, inode0 wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >>> I used: (((foo==0)?foo=1:0)) and it works in a bash script! >> I don't think that is quite the same as what I'm

Gnome Q: Application window save-data for restore when reopened?

I am sorry if this question was asked before, but I was wondering why is it, that most app- lication's main window do not restore it's last save-data the next time it is opened? What I am talking about is window position and size data, but not limited to these only. How many times does an applica

Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2011 01:20 AM, Gene Smith wrote: > I can manually run a tftp server that allows access to files in a > directory under ~ with no problem. But when I try to run the server > under xinetd using the /etc/xinetd.d/tftp configuration file a > "p

Re: tftp from home dir running under xinetd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2011 01:57 PM, Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote: > For that reason, you have to see the avc denials; where you can check which > is the process and system calls that are been denied (xinetd or tftpd) > > Which is the SELinux policy version in yo

Re: Running httpd as a user

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/02/2011 05:20 AM, Steve Searle wrote: > Around 07:49am on Saturday, July 02, 2011 (UK time), Jonathan Gardner > scrawled: > >> I build websites for a living. I'd like to get /usr/sbin/httpd running >> as a regular user. I've setup a directory w

Re: Network printer detection from wifi client to print-server->router

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/2011 11:05 AM, Daniele Guerrieri wrote: > Avahi is installed on both machines. > Also, after a recent upgrade it doesn't work no more; where can i see > a detailed cups log? > To make it work the first time i needed to completely disable selin

Re: F15 Why does gnome-shell automatically start Adobe acroread updater? (malware?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2011 04:19 PM, Deron Meranda wrote: > For some reason, my Gnome 3 shell process has forked off an 'acroread' > process which I did not start! > > It appears to be attempting to install itself or do something in the > background. This is comp

Re: adding users with different home directory ( /1home instead of /home)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/19/2011 07:57 AM, Jatin K wrote: > Dear all > > I'm RHEL 6 , trying to add a user with following command > > useradd -d /1home user1 passwd user1 > > > if I try ssh user1@localhost , following error displayed on the > screen > > Could not ch

Re: adding users with different home directory ( /1home instead of /home)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/2011 01:11 AM, Jatin K wrote: > On Tuesday 19 July 2011 06:10 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/19/2011 07:57 AM, Jatin K wrote: >>> Dear all >>>

Re: BackupPC error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux > issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own > package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer for Fedora but

Re: BackupPC error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2011 02:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh > wrote: >> On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some >>>

Re: Need Little IT advice here...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/12/2011 12:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 22:57:18 -0500, Manuel Escudero > wrote: >> >> I want to set a standard configuration in a machine and then let >> that machine to be used by many users, but as soon as the user

Re: PDF to text?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/12/2011 11:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > I have a .pdf file I need to convert to text in order to use Google > translate on it. I tried copy/paste but it won't copy from a .pdf. > > I don't care about format just need to translate with fair accura

Re: How to mount floppy?

On 08/16/2011 11:34 AM, Jon Ingason wrote: > 2011-08-16 19:57, Vinny Onelli skrev: >> Hello, >> I installed vmware and now I would like to install windows Me. The >> windows me CD it is not bootable it came with bootable diskette, vmware >> to install windows need the operating system which is on t

Re: How to mount floppy?

On 08/16/2011 11:50 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 8/16/2011 7:52 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >>> mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1440 /mnt/floppy >>> >>> See URL: >>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/fedora-13-mounting-floppy-813466/ >>

Re: How to mount floppy?

On 08/17/2011 09:41 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > On 08/16/2011 11:50 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: >> On 8/16/2011 7:52 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >>>> mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1440 /mnt/floppy >>>> >>>> See URL: >>>> http://www.linuxqu

Re: How to mount floppy?

On 08/17/2011 10:01 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> Added info: On reboot, one has to modprobe all over >> again (F13, 14). Auto-detection of floppy device no longer >> works, or so it seems. > Just run:

Re: Lost Firefox Menu Bar -

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/19/2011 04:17 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > I've managed to screw up Firefox! > > I disabled the "Menu Bar". I believe that's what it's called. I > can no longer see File, Edit, View, etc. And of course View is > where I need to be to turn t

Re: Personal VPN on Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/23/2011 10:51 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > > 2011/8/23 Manuel Escudero > > > > > 2011/8/22 admin lewis > > > 2011/8/20 Manuel Escudero >: >> Hi there: >

Re: selinux + mailman +postfix security problem (F14)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/25/2011 11:52 AM, Fulko Hew wrote: > On Fedora 14, I am setting up postfix and mailman. > > I had this working once, but I decided to yum erase postfix and > mailman and redo the configuration to prove I knew how to recreate > it. > > Turns out

Re: slim (simple login manager)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/28/2011 09:23 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 08/28/2011 03:21 AM, cromworshipper-fedorast...@yahoo.com > wrote: >> slim started up fine when this machine was running Fedora 14. I >> installed it from for Fedora 15: >> >> slim-1.3.2-8.fc15.x86_6

Re: slim (simple login manager)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2011 01:58 PM, cromworshipper-fedorast...@yahoo.com wrote: > In-Reply-To: <4e5a413b.9090...@robertoragusa.it> > > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> On 08/28/2011 03:21 AM, cromworshipper-fedorast...@yahoo.c

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/29/2011 09:23 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 29.08.2011, Dave Cross wrote: > >> I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1]. > Seems nobody likes it (me included). Frankly, Gnome3 is broken by design and > a f*cking piece of cr*p :-) > All the students at my college

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/30/2011 05:30 AM, gpe wrote: > On 08/29/2011 05:23 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote: >>> I've tried GNOME 3 for a couple of months and I really don't like it[1]. > I still remember the times when KDE4 was born. It was terrible comparing > to 3.5. After a while it was started to evolved, it became more

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/30/2011 12:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/30/2011 11:36 AM, Julius Smith wrote: >> I found alacarte, gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu, >> etc., to recover lost functionality. > Right now, I'm running XFCE 4.6 on my desktop, but I've used a > third-party repo to upgrade my lapto

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/30/2011 12:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/30/2011 12:30 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> XFCE: >> 1) Does XFCE allow creation of new panels, left/right/top(or bottom) >> with features such as hiding panels which appears only when the >> mouse is moved i

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, stan wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:38:16 +0100 > Dave Cross wrote: > >> Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the >> F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the F14 srpms on my F15 system? >> >> Or perhaps someone else has already done this work and made GNO

Re: GNOME 2 on Fedora 15

On 08/30/2011 01:33 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, stan wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:38:16 +0100 >> Dave Cross wrote: >> >>> Is there any way to go back to GNOME 2 on Fedora 15? Can I reuse the >>> F14 rpms? Or can I rebuild the

Re: slim (simple login manager)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2011 07:01 PM, John Schmitt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:52:54AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/28/2011 09:23 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >&

Re: slim (simple login manager)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/31/2011 06:17 PM, John Schmitt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:13:42AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/30/2011 07:01 PM, John Schmitt wrote: >>> On M

Re: Sound from KVM guest

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/01/2011 01:33 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 22:08 +0900, panicloop wrote: >> On 09/01/2011 08:32 AM, Michael Eager wrote: >>> Hi -- >>> >>> I installed Windows 7 in a KVM virtual machine running on >>> Fedora 15. The gues

Re: slim (simple login manager)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/01/2011 02:58 PM, cromworshipper-fedorast...@yahoo.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:49:59AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 08/31/2011 06:17 PM, John Schmitt w

Re: Fedora 15 is a lot like Windows OS's.. irritating, offensive, difficult to use with ease, nauseating to try...

On 09/01/2011 02:18 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 16:01 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> 2. Who thought it was a good idea to make someone put their cursor to >> the upper left corner in order to switch desktops that are all the way >> on the right? How is that ergonomic? I act

F-EOL versions of Firefox: How to remove co-opted Diginotar CA?

For EOL FF versions, how can I remove the co-opted Diginotar CA certificate? Instructions given by Mozilla does not remove this certificate. If the root CA's cannot be manually removed, Is there a FF rpm that has the fix? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or chang

Re: F15, diskless node, systemctl start tmpfs.device timeout

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/05/2011 09:08 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > Xiao Peng Wang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I made a diskless image against Fedora15, during the boot I found >> it displayed the following error message and went into emergency >> mode. >> >> The error messa

Re: F-EOL versions of Firefox: How to remove co-opted Diginotar CA?

On 09/06/2011 08:08 AM, Pasha R wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> For EOL FF versions, how can I remove the co-opted >> Diginotar CA certificate? Instructions given by Mozilla >> does not remove this certificate. >> >> If the roo

Re: F-EOL versions of Firefox: How to remove co-opted Diginotar CA?

On 09/06/2011 08:24 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:18, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> Now... I need to figure out how to do a backport of ca-certificates >> pkg so if anyone has any idea how this can be done, I am all ears... > Well, Wikileaks has proved

Re: F-EOL versions of Firefox: How to remove co-opted Diginotar CA?

On 09/06/2011 08:49 AM, Pasha R wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >> On 09/06/2011 08:08 AM, Pasha R wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: >>>> For EOL FF versions, how can I remove the co-opted

Re: F-EOL versions of Firefox: How to remove co-opted Diginotar CA?

On 09/06/2011 08:52 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:18:34 -0700 > Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > >> Now... I need to figure out how to do a backport of ca-certificates >> pkg so if anyone has any idea how this can be done, I am all ears... > My approach would b

Re: DNS mystery: NetworkManager vs SELinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/13/2011 08:19 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote: > On 09/13/2011 06:48 AM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: >> My netbook has a rather vanilla installation of F15. >> >> I tried a new desktop. Wireless didn't work (long story, not >> relevant) so I manually ra

Re: DNS mystery: NetworkManager vs SELinux

ond NetworkManager for creating the /etc/resolv.conf with > bad labeling. There may be some SELinux policy issue here. - > NetworkManager's "settings" window for showing all's well when > NetworkManager knows or should have known that it isn't. > > So: sho

Re: DNS mystery: NetworkManager vs SELinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2011 10:28 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > | From: Daniel J Walsh > > | Well I just tried to run NetworkManager as root and see > something | similar, although I also end up with the resolv.conf > having bogus data | in it.

Re: LXDE is an acceptable substitute for Gnome 2

On 09/17/2011 01:28 PM, Alan Cox wrote: >> I personally think that you GNOME 3 devs are incompetent (I know that there >> are some who are not happy about the state of it and perhaps will get an >> upper >> hand in due time - the sooner the better). > That seems uncalled for. Trying to build a new

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >