Dear All,
Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued:
https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992
Is there some alternative to using snap or web-skype
https://snapcraft.io/install/skype/fedora
?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
--
Hello,
I am still stuck with my installation.
Question
Why
grub2-mkconfig
says
Found Fedora Linux 36 (Workstation Edition) on /dev/sdb11
Found Fedora Linux 40 (Forty) on /dev/sdc3
Found Fedora Linux 36 (Workstation Edition) on /dev/mapper/VolSys_2-root
Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Se
> On 4 Jun 2024, at 11:35, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> but in the generated file (grub.cfg) there is no reference to Fedora 40
> or sdc3
Fedora use BLS (boot loader specifcations) that are in /boot/loader/entries.
grub, by default, scans that folder and adds all the entries to the me
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:35:37 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> but in the generated file (grub.cfg) there is no reference to Fedora 40
> or sdc3
What do you see in the grub2.cfg file section with the "10_linux" header?
--
___
users mailing list --
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:35:37 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>
> > but in the generated file (grub.cfg) there is no reference to Fedora 40
> > or sdc3
>
> What do you see in the grub2.cfg file section with the "10_linux" header?
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
insmod part_gpt
insmod ext
In my case
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 160 Jun 4 12:26 11b839ed895a4a55a8ef89bc2dcec102-0-memtest86+.conf
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 417 Jun 4 12:26 11b839ed895a4a55a8ef89bc2dcec102-0-rescue.conf
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 362 Jun 4 12:26 11b839ed895a4a55a8ef89bc2dcec102-6.8.7-100.fc38.x86_64.conf
-rw
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt4
> --hint-efi=hd0,gpt4 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt4
> 0ab8c5a6-a344-48f8-afca-e6187c589cde
> else
> search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root 0ab8c5a6-a344-48f8-afca-
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>
> > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt4
> > --hint-efi=hd0,gpt4 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt4
> > 0ab8c5a6-a344-48f8-afca-e6187c589cde
> > else
> > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
> > 0ab8
> On 4 Jun 2024, at 13:11, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> Fedora 38 when I will be sure that I can have control on the full
> installation.
> The risk is that I lost more control, typically on the installation of sda4
The way I test out new Fedora releases is to see if the live image
On 4 Jun 2024, at 13:11, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Fedora 38 when I will be sure that I can have control on the full installation.
The risk is that I lost more control, typically on the installation of sda4
The way I test out new Fedora releases is to see if the live image w
I installed the F40 XFCE Spin on a Framework 16 laptop. Display power
management is enabled but the laptop display does not blank after the
prescribed period of inactivity, whether the laptop is plugged in or on
battery.
I tried uninstalling xfce4-screensaver, this made no difference.
Does
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 11:21 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued:
>
> https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992
>
> Is there some alternative to using snap or web-skype
>
> https://snapcraft.io/i
On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> With your message we lost the thread.
The thread is there. You're not supposed to keep quoting every prior
reply when you respond to messages. Messages become huge and
unreadable messes.
You're supposed to reply to the bits you
> On 4 Jun 2024, at 13:39, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2024, at 13:11, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> Fedora 38 when I will be sure that I can have control on the full
> installation.
> The risk is that I lost more control, typically on the installation of sda4
>
It seems there's a flatpak:
flatpak search skype
Name Description Application
ID Version Branch Remotes
Skype Call and message skype users, with video chat support
com.skype.Client8.119.0.201 stable flathub
On 6/4/24 5:21 AM, Paul Smith
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 23:36 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> You're supposed to reply to the bits you're responding to, and cut
> out
> the rest that isn't actually needed. Unfortunately people are
> forgetting this and trying to get an entire thread inside each and
> every message.
>
> If anyone ha
This is on fedora 40, a fresh 'everything' network install.
I always update/upgrade manually using 'sudo dnf --refresh upgrade'.
To save typing I would scroll through the command history using the
arrow keys.
But 'sudo dnf --refresh upgrade' is no longer listed!
All other commands I used are still
It truly depends on how the default management of bash history is set up in
the virgin environment.Variables like HISTCONTROL, HISTIGNORE can play a part.
The setting for 'shopt -s histappend' also matters.The BASH man page briefly
explains them.
R,-Joe
On Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 12:17:4
If you have 2 separate sessions open for the given user last save/exit
wins and overwrites the history file. This may be an
oversimplification but 2 sessions both saving out do seem to make a
mess.
And if there is no -TERM and/or clean exit then nothing gets written out.
I have trained people on
Hi
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 11:21 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued:
https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992
Is there some alternative to using sn
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024, at 3:42 PM, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> So, if I try to reinstall from the current f40 live usb - can I do that
> without touching the backup subvolume? ie:
>
> /dev/nvme0n1p3btrfs 1,951,850,496 464,659,184 1,486,438,224
> 24% /
> /dev/nvme0n1p3btr
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With ext4 filesystems, I used to set
>
> ext4noauto,errors=remount-ro1 2
>
> in the fstab.
>
> With btrfs FS
> it does not like the option errors=remount-ro
That is an ext4 specific mount option. Btrfs alr
On Tue, May 14, 2024, at 2:12 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 08:27 -0700, richard emberson wrote:
>> Back on 05/03/2024 I posted the question:
>> "How to increase size of /boot partition"
>> I had the same problem.
>>
>> As was noted by some, I had not upgraded for a long, l
On Tue, May 14, 2024, at 7:27 PM, richard emberson wrote:
> Poking about I see that the default workstation disk layout:
>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/workstation-docs/disk-config/
> has /boot on a ext4 partition and everything else on btrfs.
> Also, the replacement for Anaconda will
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> GRUB hidden boot menu feature depends on a really curious file called grubenv
Just to note: boot-time grubenv modification is used for more than boot
success/fail detection. Setting a default boot option during boot and
setting a boot-once option (at least)
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 16:26 +, Joe Wulf wrote:
It truly depends on how the default management of bash history is set
up in the virgin environment.
Variables like HISTCONTROL, HISTIGNORE can play a part. The setting
for 'shopt -s histappend' also matters.
The BASH man page briefly explains them
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:11:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >
> > > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt4
> > > --hint-efi=hd0,gpt4 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt4
> > > 0ab8c5a6-a344-48f8-afca-
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:11:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:03 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > >
> > > > search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,gpt4
> > > > --hint-efi=hd0,gpt4 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt4
> > > > 0ab8c5a6-a
On 6/4/24 1:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I made some progresses, but not enough
I mounted the Fedora 40 / and
cp -a /mnt/fedrao40/boot/loader/entries/* /boot/loader/entries
cat
/boot/loader/entries/dcdc9ed7e87243ec91d6d876cf7c3384-6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64.conf
title Fedora Linux (6.8.11-
>
> On 6/4/24 1:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > I made some progresses, but not enough
> > I mounted the Fedora 40 / and
> > cp -a /mnt/fedrao40/boot/loader/entries/* /boot/loader/entries
> >
> > cat
> > /boot/loader/entries/dcdc9ed7e87243ec91d6d876cf7c3384-6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64.conf
> >
On 6/4/24 1:39 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/4/24 1:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I made some progresses, but not enough
I mounted the Fedora 40 / and
cp -a /mnt/fedrao40/boot/loader/entries/* /boot/loader/entries
cat
/boot/loader/entries/dcdc9ed7e87243ec91d6d876cf7c3384-6.8
Patrick Dupre via users composed on 2024-06-04 22:15 (UTC+0200):
> I do not understand, because every thing seems OK
> The file is at the right place as well as
> System.map-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64
> initramfs-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64.img
> config-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64
> symvers-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_
> Patrick Dupre via users composed on 2024-06-04 22:15 (UTC+0200):
>
> > I do not understand, because every thing seems OK
> > The file is at the right place as well as
> > System.map-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64
> > initramfs-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64.img
> > config-6.8.11-300.fc40.x86_64
> > symvers-6.8.1
> On 6/4/24 1:39 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/4/24 1:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>> I made some progresses, but not enough
> >>> I mounted the Fedora 40 / and
> >>> cp -a /mnt/fedrao40/boot/loader/entries/* /boot/loader/entries
> >>>
> >>> cat
> >>> /boot/loader/
Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-06-04 13:49 (UTC-0700):
> Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>> I am maintaining this machine for numerous years, it always passed the
>> updates,
>> but from 38 to 40, the same approach fails!
> You haven't given a full explanation of your disk layout,
If you provide
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 5975BF99-78B4-4807-9CE4-C2BB0B8FE075
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 4096 2M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 6144 33560575 3355443216G Linux swap
/dev/sda3 33560576 34584575 1024000 500M EFI Sy
On 6/4/24 2:57 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Model: ATA Maxtor 6Y080M0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdc: 82.0GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End SizeType File system Flags
2 1049kB 470MB 469MB primary ext4
Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-06-04 15:03 (UTC-0700):
> You don't have an EFI partition on this disk. It's not even a GPT >
> partition table. So both installations will be fighting over the EFI >
> partition on sda. And there's no easy way to add a boot entry for this >
> installation.
A mul
Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-06-04 15:03 (UTC-0700):
> You don't have an EFI partition on this disk. It's not even a GPT
> partition table. So both installations will be fighting over the EFI
> partition on sda. And there's no easy way to add a boot entry for this
> installation.
A multiboo
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:02 PM Walter Cazzola wrote:
>
> >> Recently, the linux rpm distribution of skype has been discontinued:
>
> >> https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?332743-Updates-hang-on-skype&p=1883992
>
> >> Is there some alternative to using snap or web-skype
>
> >> https://sn
So I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out why attempts to push via
DAV to a git repo were failing.
Eventually I succeeded in stracing the httpd process sto capture the
request. It was getting an EROFS when it tried to write to the git repo.
Amusing.
To make a long story short, the
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 22:15:33 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I guess that when I run grub2-mkconfig there was a UBS key what connected on
> the usb poer.
>
> I made some progresses, but not enough
> I mounted the Fedora 40 / and
> cp -a /mnt/fedrao40/boot/loader/entries/* /boot/loader/ent
The easy solution is chattr +i and that will block all
further changes to the file forever.
It is kind of a last resort.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:24 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> So I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out why attempts to push via
> DAV to a git repo were failing.
>
> Ev
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 6:24 PM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> So I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out why attempts to push
> via
> DAV to a git repo were failing.
>
> Eventually I succeeded in stracing the httpd process sto capture the
> request. It was getting an EROFS when it tried to write
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:24 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> So I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out why attempts to push via
> DAV to a git repo were failing.
>
> Eventually I succeeded in stracing the httpd process sto capture the
> request. It was getting an EROFS when it tried to write
Sam Varshavchik composed on 2024-06-04 19:24 (UTC-0400):
> So I was tearing my hair out trying to figure out why attempts to push via
> DAV to a git repo were failing.
> Eventually I succeeded in stracing the httpd process sto capture the
> request. It was getting an EROFS when it tried to wr
46 matches
Mail list logo
