Re: systemd-resolved floods the logs

2021-01-06 Thread Jerome Lille
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 18:10 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Chris Murphy writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:32 AM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > Maybe this bug: > > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13432 > > "opened this issue on Aug 29, 2019" > > I would not expect thi

Re: systemd-resolved floods the logs

2021-01-06 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jerome Lille writes: On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 18:10 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Chris Murphy writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:32 AM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > Maybe this bug: > > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13432 > > "opened this issue on Aug 29, 2019" > > I w

Solution to Blank Screen in Output Video During Screen Recording in OBS Studio for Fedora Workstation 33 Linux

2021-01-06 Thread Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: Solution to Blank Screen in Output Video During Screen Recording in OBS Studio for Fedora Workstation 33 Linux Good day from Singapore, My laptop is a refurbished HP Elitebook 840 G1 installed with Fedora Workstation 33 Linux 64-bit. My integrated VGA cards are: [teo-en-ming@localh

Re: btrfs RAID 5?

2021-01-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 00:04 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Tue., 5 Jan. 2021, 20:53 Chris Murphy, wrote: > > > > > If there are specific topics that need single source documentation, > > including how to, with examples, possibly also with references - maybe > > that'd be more useful and main

Re: Solution to Blank Screen in Output Video During Screen Recording in OBS Studio for Fedora Workstation 33 Linux

2021-01-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 1/6/21 6:54 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: When I do screen recording in OBS Studio, the output video shows a blank screen. Yes, OBS has trouble with Wayland. I have solved this problem by doing the following few steps. $ sudo nano /etc/gdm/custom.conf Uncommment the followin

Re: btrfs RAID 5?

2021-01-06 Thread George N. White III
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:05, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > > On Tue., 5 Jan. 2021, 20:53 Chris Murphy, wrote: > >> >> If there are specific topics that need single source documentation, >> including how to, with examples, possibly also with references - maybe >> that'd be more useful and maintainab

libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread John Pilkington
I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? John P ___ users mailing

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/2021 06:40, John Pilkington wrote: I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed.   A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to  'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? It isn't just you. I

dnf for newbies

2021-01-06 Thread David
I am just curious if the Fedora Wiki on dnf is the best source of info on the current state of dnf. I see on YouTube all the Debian / Ubuntu-fanboys criticizing dnf. The other sources of info on the web about dnf seem to be at least prior to 2018. I do not yet know enough to help update those so

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Tim via users
John Pilkington: >> I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv >> package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and >> is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the >> same error. >> >> Is it just me? Ed Greshko: > It isn't just you. >

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/2021 13:33, Tim via users wrote: John Pilkington: I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? Ed Gresh

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I'm not sure how this could happen with updates repos. pungi (The > tool that makes them) fails if something isn't signed correctly. All the more reason to be suspicious and cautious, if there's supposed to be a counter-check that doesn't allo