On 04/20/19 22:06, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On this computer NM shows 192.168.122.1 initially, the other one I
have been using ...124.1
If this is the address you are seeing on your computer, then you're
probably looking at virbr0 which is the virtual bridge interface used
by libvirtd for virtua
On Sun, 2019-04-21 at 11:10 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I have cameras and another ASUS router set up in the barn and all
> that stuff will need to be reconfigured if I change the
> address range.
Third option, then: Put a switch after the ISP's modem/router, and
plug everything that you trust n
On 4/21/19 8:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
my router at 192.168.1.1 and the Viasat router uses 192.168.1.1 also.
Hi Bob,
Therein lies your problem. You can continue to use your original setup
if you configure your Viasat router correctly. There is no reason to
keep beating your head against a
On 4/21/19 10:19 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 4/21/19 8:10 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
my router at 192.168.1.1 and the Viasat router uses 192.168.1.1 also.
Hi Bob,
Therein lies your problem. You can continue to use your original setup
if you configure your Viasat router correctly. There is no re
On 04/21/19 13:19, Mike Wright wrote:
Basically it will say the same thing. Put your Viasat modem/router
into BRIDGED mode. That's all you have to do.
.
.
Mike, I would be happy to do that but I have gone over the Viasat router
configuration menus and found nothing to select Bridged mode.
On 4/21/19 10:56 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 04/21/19 13:19, Mike Wright wrote:
Basically it will say the same thing. Put your Viasat modem/router
into BRIDGED mode. That's all you have to do.
.
Mike, I would be happy to do that but I have gone over the Viasat router
configuration menus and f
On 04/21/19 16:46, Samuel Sieb wrote:
emorable ...
That is a different "bridged mode" than what we've been referring to.
If you can't set the modem to bridged mode, then you need to change
it's IP subnet to something other than 192.168.1.0/24. If the modem
and your router are both using t
On 20Apr2019 14:04, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 4/20/19 1:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/19/19 11:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/20/19 2:56 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/19/19 11:13 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I check what the default acceleration is set to?
right
(responding to sixpack13)
> there are errors mostly regarding ACPI, but it doesn't seems
> to me that the box has difficulties to run.
Agreed. I used to see those (or something similar) every time I booted.
I haven't seen such messages in a while now.
> as I thought kmod-nvidia-5.0.7-200 bel
I'm running 64-bit F29 using the default LVM, but with no separate home
partition. Today smartctl reported that "Current_Pending_Sector" and
"Offline_Uncorrectable" increased from 0 to 1. Running a self-test failed
almost immediately with
Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaini
On 4/21/19 4:15 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 20Apr2019 14:04, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 4/20/19 1:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/19/19 11:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/20/19 2:56 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/19/19 11:13 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I check wha
BTW, I have another machine also running 64-bit F29, with the same size HDD,
and no disk problems. The fdisk output is exactly the same, as are the errors
when using tune2fs or debugfs on sda4 or sda5, so those errors have nothing to
do with my HDD problems, they appear to be generic to any Fedo
On 21Apr2019 18:50, ToddAndMargo wrote:
More interesting. Xfce's mouse dialog show acceleration is on:
screenshot:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=8432
Just wondering whether this dialogue is a direct query of the mouse
state or some kind of proxy via Xfce's settings i.e. if you
On 4/21/19 8:41 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Apr2019 18:50, ToddAndMargo wrote:
More interesting. Xfce's mouse dialog show acceleration is on:
screenshot:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=8432
Just wondering whether this dialogue is a direct query of the mouse
state or some ki
On 21Apr2019 20:49, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 4/21/19 8:41 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
This may be the issue. The screen shot shows an acceleration of 2.5
and xinput says it is zero. Xfce may be misreading xinput
Can xinput acceleration be <0? To "descale" the mouse? What if Xfce
is showing an
15 matches
Mail list logo
