It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
How can I train dnf to pull in kernel-devel when the kernel is updated?
--
Erik
--
users mailing list
On 03/11/16 17:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
> to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
> when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
>
> How can I train dnf to pull in kernel-devel when the
Stan,
> It sounds like it is a communication problem. Is there anything
> different about the firewall or printer configuration compared with one
> of the workstations that work? How about the permissions or context
> of files and directories?
That was it - the laptop's setup and import of the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
> to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
> when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
>
> How can I train dnf to pull in kernel-d
On 2016-03-11 at 07:38:24 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen
> wrote:
>
> > It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > kernel to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do
> > it manually when I run into a problem that it is
On 11 March 2016 at 13:53, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 2016-03-11 at 07:38:24 Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > > kernel to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I h
On 2016-03-11 at 14:01:48 James Hogarth wrote:
> On 11 March 2016 at 13:53, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> > On 2016-03-11 at 07:38:24 Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
On 03/04/16 18:57, Rick Stevens wrote:
Check the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
file. It should
look sorta like this (things like the
UUID, HWADDR and DNS stuff will be
different):
TYPE="Ethernet"
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
DEFROUTE="yes"
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="no"
IPV6INIT="yes"
IPV6_AUTOCO
I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
interested in keeping it alive?
-- Rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:
On 03/11/2016 12:48 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
interested in keeping it alive?
I would think that most people using KDE are using it. How popular is
KDE under Fedora?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On 16/03/11 13:18, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/11/2016 12:48 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
interested in keeping it alive?
I would think that most people using KDE are using it.
How popular is KDE under Fedora?
Didn't KDE switch to
On 03/11/2016 01:27 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
Didn't KDE switch to SDDM or so with Plasma 5?
I use Xfce, and don't follow what's going on with either KDE or Gnome.
I know that kdm is a Display Manager for KDE, and presumed that it was
the default.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:48:04 -0600
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
> interested in keeping it alive?
What nonsense! It is the only login manager that actually
works. Fix this 8 year old bug before talking about
getting rid of kdm:
htt
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 13:34 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 01:27 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> >
> > Didn't KDE switch to SDDM or so with Plasma 5?
> I use Xfce, and don't follow what's going on with either KDE or
> Gnome.
> I know that kdm is a Display Manager for KDE, and presumed tha
On 03/12/16 07:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 13:34 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 03/11/2016 01:27 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
>>> Didn't KDE switch to SDDM or so with Plasma 5?
>> I use Xfce, and don't follow what's going on with either KDE or
>> Gnome.
>> I know that k
On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 07:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 03/12/16 07:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 13:34 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > >
> > > On 03/11/2016 01:27 PM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Didn't KDE switch to SDDM or so with Plasma 5?
> > > I
On 03/12/16 07:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 07:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Is there a bugzilla for that issue?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317066
Humm This is a newly opened bugzilla based on your comment in the KDE list
to track
upstream b
Hi everyone!
I love KDM but I can't find out how to configure it through KDE System
Settings.
I truly hate SDDM, it's too simple and fails often.
I use either Light DM or KDM.
BTW, my desktops are Cinnamon and Plasma 5.
Cheers
Sylvia
On Friday, 11 March 2016, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 03/
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/11/2016 12:48 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
>> interested in keeping it alive?
>
> I would think that most people using KDE are using it. How popular is
> KDE under Fedora?
Sorry I was a bit brief in my
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 03/12/16 07:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 07:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a bugzilla for that issue?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317066
>
> Humm This is a newly opened bugzilla based on your comment in
Had anybody gotten xrdp to work on Fedora 23 with tigervnc?
I can't seem to get it to work in EC2.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject
21 matches
Mail list logo
