My DD-WRT router log contains the line:
192.168.1.7 172.17.2.46
UDP snmp-trap Accepted
192.168.1.7 is an F-22 computer that is "turned off" [with the power
button] however I have noticed in the early morning darkness the usb
keyboard back-lights flash on occasionally
On 10/13/2015 12:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Any idea what it is or what I should do about it if it matters would be
of interest ...
Do you have Wake on LAN enabled?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 10/13/15 03:32, Joe Zeff wrote:
Do you have Wake on LAN enabled?
I will look for that when next I boot it, in the morning.
Thank you,
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 FEDORA-23beta/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
Allegedly, on or about 13 October 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> 192.168.1.7 is an F-22 computer that is "turned off" [with the power
> button] however I have noticed in the early morning darkness the usb
> keyboard back-lights flash on occasionally. I assume it is something
> set in the BIOS configur
Hi all,
I tried installing xbacklight and with it, I can now adjust the screen
brightness. The shortcut keys still doesn't work, but I can adjust with the
xbacklight command.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
wrote:
> HI,
>
> I am using ThinkPad Lenovo T530 laptop and I am on F
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:58:34 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> Me too. sshd had to reenabled on an upgrade today to 22. BTW, also named
> and dhcpd. No problems with earlier upgrades.
Weird. I always do regular updates and haven't seen this problem.
I always just run dnf from the command line as root. A
I don't think it always happens. I have a classroom with 20 i7 machines that I
upgraded to Fedora 22 a short time ago. I have one main machine, and have
scripts that use plink to ssh into all the others to run updates and do other
things. After one upgrade a while ago, two of the machines were n
upgraded one of my friends' laptops this morning and got same problem...
2015-10-13 14:28 GMT+02:00 Michael D. Setzer II :
> I don't think it always happens. I have a classroom with 20 i7 machines
> that I
> upgraded to Fedora 22 a short time ago. I have one main machine, and have
> scripts that
On 10/13/15 03:46, Tim wrote:
Any idea what it is or what I should do about it if it matters would
>be of interest ...
If it's one that can be turned on by the keyboard, either by pressing a
special button, or just hitting any keys, the main board has to power
the keyboard for that function to w
On 10/13/15 10:42, Bob Goodwin wrote:
As it is now I can see the MEBX menu screen but it wont accept the
default password.
So now I must decide if I want to bother with it, I keep thinking, if
it ain't broke don't fix it, but there's the challenge to try ...
*Bob*
.
Ok, the problem shoul
On 10/13/2015 12:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
My DD-WRT router log contains the line:
192.168.1.7 172.17.2.46
UDP snmp-trap Accepted
192.168.1.7 is an F-22 computer that is "turned off" [with the power
button] however I have noticed in the early morning darkness the usb
keybo
On 10/13/15 12:42, Rick Stevens wrote:
Do you have "wake on LAN", "wake on serial" or anything like that
enabled in the BIOS?
.
Apparently there is a second "BIOS," MEBX, which I eventually was able
to disable. It seems to have a wake on LAN feature. See earlier part of
thread.
Thanks,
B
Greetings,
I'm seeing a lot of announcements for different Fedora 23 packages.
Has F23 been released, or is it still in Beta?
And when would/will F21 be EOL'd?
Thanks.
M
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapro
On 10/13/2015 01:11 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm seeing a lot of announcements for different Fedora 23 packages.
>
> Has F23 been released, or is it still in Beta?
Still in Beta. The following link shows you the anticipated release
date of October 27:
> https://fedoraproject.o
On 09/28/2015 07:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase audit
After running dnf erase audit (several days ago),
I am still getting tons of audit messages.
So, I thought that perhaps the command had not succeeded. I reran:
# dnf erase audit
No match for argument: audit
Error: No packages marked for
On 10/13/2015 11:33 AM, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/28/2015 07:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase audit
After running dnf erase audit (several days ago),
I am still getting tons of audit messages.
So, I thought that perhaps the command had not succeeded. I reran:
# dnf erase audit
No match for argument
Hey
-I know this is off topic of pure fed/rh/centos.
I'm thinking of stepping into playing/testing the learning curve of
the cloud systems. Basically, setting up a test network of a few
boxes, and going through the entire processes of having a working
'cloud' system, using a few cheap instances f
On 10/13/2015 12:33 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/28/2015 07:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase audit
After running dnf erase audit (several days ago),
I am still getting tons of audit messages.
So, I thought that perhaps the command had not succeeded. I reran:
# dnf erase audit
No match for argu
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:33:00 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> I am still getting tons of audit messages.
Adding audit=0 to the kernel command line args in grub.cfg
will definitely eradicate audit (unless someone decides they
just have to change the kernel option which, naturally, happens
constantly in the o
On 10/13/2015 12:42 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/13/2015 11:33 AM, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/28/2015 07:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase audit
After running dnf erase audit (several days ago),
I am still getting tons of audit messages.
So, I thought that perhaps the command had not succeeded. I rer
On 10/13/2015 12:08 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Have rebooted many times.
Stopped it several times etc.
Thank you; I wasn't aware.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of C
But I see nothing in /var/log about it.
I get that banner during login but it disappears and
I cannot copy it's contents.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduc
can 32 bit see 16 g of ram . I have a amd quard core 3.6g with 16 g of
ram . But I have a problime with the video card ? I want to see if the
32 bit would fix it
--
William Biggs
bbi...@fastmail.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On 10/14/2015 10:22 AM, William Biggs wrote:
> can 32 bit see 16 g of ram . I have a amd quard core 3.6g with 16 g of
> ram . But I have a problime with the video card ? I want to see if the
> 32 bit would fix it
The 32 bit PAE kernel supplied with Fedora I believe has a 64GB limit. Your
hardw
I get this if this it to much code sorry do this help ?
grep pae
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc
extd_apicid aperfmperf eagerfpu
On 10/14/2015 10:40 AM, William Biggs wrote:
> I get this if this it to much code sorry do this help ?
> grep pae
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae <--
>
--
In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay
away from computers altogether.
--
users m
On 10/14/2015 10:42 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 10:40 AM, William Biggs wrote:
>> I get this if this it to much code sorry do this help ?
>> grep pae
>> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae <--
>>
So you're good to go as your CPU supports it.
(Cat walking across keyboard
thanks
--
William Biggs
bbi...@fastmail.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015, at 07:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 10:42 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 10/14/2015 10:40 AM, William Biggs wrote:
> >> I get this if this it to much code sorry do this help ?
> >> grep pae
> >> flags : fpu
I downloaded the 32 bit ver of xface fedora spin . I burned it to dvd .
After I try to boot it will not boot at att so I try to re download it
try to burn it agine it dose burn it all the way and pass . But when I
try to boot off dvd it dose not boot . So I try a burn copy of the 64bit
ver and it b
On 10/14/2015 01:31 PM, William Biggs wrote:
> I downloaded the 32 bit ver of xface fedora spin . I burned it to dvd .
> After I try to boot it will not boot at att so I try to re download it
> try to burn it agine it dose burn it all the way and pass . But when I
> try to boot off dvd it dose not
I just tryed it in gnome boxes the iso boot's just fine
--
William Biggs
bbi...@fastmail.com
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 01:31 PM, William Biggs wrote:
> > I downloaded the 32 bit ver of xface fedora spin . I burned it to dvd .
> > After I try to boo
31 matches
Mail list logo
