> On 04/12/15 12:28, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> I was
>> worried that maybe none of the versions past 36.0.4 would work on Fedora
>> 14. If this is happening to a lot pf people I have to assume it will get
>> fixed. Maybe not a good assumption seeing how things are done in the
>> software industry today.
On 04/12/15 15:59, Jim Lewis wrote:
> Yes, I believe it's about 3 years EOL, and is still 1000 times better
> than anything they have put since. That's why I still use it on my main
> system.
And that is all well and good. But, it is the reason why you shouldn't hope
for a fix.
--
If you can
Poma,
> Perhaps we have already solved it, what you say? :)
I did respond to John and confirmed that the size parameter he suggested
did exist, but had the value 'normal'
> Allen asked for another issue - background/wallpaper,
> and still didn't respond about advice offered.
I didn't see a resp
I posted about this on the mythtv-users list and have a workaround, but
it seems worth an airing here.
I have a new installation of fc21, KDE spin, 64-bit on a Core2Duo box.
MythTV is from rpm fusion and UPnP requires UDP on port 1900. I have
been unable to set this up using the default syste
On 04/12/15 19:38, John Pilkington wrote:
> I have a new installation of fc21, KDE spin, 64-bit on a Core2Duo box. MythTV
> is from rpm fusion and UPnP requires UDP on port 1900. I have been unable to
> set this up using the default systemd graphic firewall manager, which causes
> a tens-of-sec
On 12/04/15 13:03, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/12/15 19:38, John Pilkington wrote:
I have a new installation of fc21, KDE spin, 64-bit on a Core2Duo box. MythTV
is from rpm fusion and UPnP requires UDP on port 1900. I have been unable to
set this up using the default systemd graphic firewall mana
Hello,
In Fedora SOAS there is no install link like in most other LInux
distributions.
Could you make it in some of the future versions?
Does any other Fedora distro have an install link?
Regards,
Damjan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 11:53:13AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 12.04.2015 07:01, g wrote:
> >
> > hello Jim and Fred.
> >
>
> Did you consider it can actually be a feature?
A negative feature, ppergaps :)
--
Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
On 12/04/15 13:21, John Pilkington wrote:
On 12/04/15 13:03, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/12/15 19:38, John Pilkington wrote:
I have a new installation of fc21, KDE spin, 64-bit on a Core2Duo
box. MythTV is from rpm fusion and UPnP requires UDP on port 1900. I
have been unable to set this up using
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 15:52 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 09:03 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:47:41 +0100
> > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately not. This is a site used for "official" purposes and there
> > > is no way round it. A
On 04/12/15 20:46, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 12/04/15 13:21, John Pilkington wrote:
>> On 12/04/15 13:03, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 04/12/15 19:38, John Pilkington wrote:
I have a new installation of fc21, KDE spin, 64-bit on a Core2Duo
box. MythTV is from rpm fusion and UPnP requires UD
On 04/12/15 21:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
> It seems to be a bug with the GUI
And the bug is specific to KDE. Tested on a VM. KDE fails, GNOME works.
Since you found it, you can have the honor of submitting the bugzilla.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users maili
On 04/12/2015 04:53 AM, poma wrote:
> On 12.04.2015 07:01, g wrote:
>>
>> hello Jim and Fred.
>>
> Did you consider it can actually be a feature?
there is another "f" word that would be more appropriate.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6
tc,ha
On 12/04/15 14:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/12/15 21:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
It seems to be a bug with the GUI
And the bug is specific to KDE. Tested on a VM. KDE fails, GNOME works.
Since you found it, you can have the honor of submitting the bugzilla.
OK, thanks, Ed. I'll try your workaro
Upgraded f21 XFCE.
nm-applet is running:
ps aux | grep nm-applet
user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00 nm-applet
but there's no icon at the top of the screen.
Of course, this means the only way to control NetworkManager is nmcli,
which requires a trip to the man page
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:48:24 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> Upgraded f21 XFCE.
>
> nm-applet is running:
>
> ps aux | grep nm-applet
> user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00
> nm-applet
>
> but there's no icon at the top of the screen.
>
> Of course, this means the only wa
On 04/12/2015 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:48:24 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
Upgraded f21 XFCE.
nm-applet is running:
ps aux | grep nm-applet
user 2856 0.0 0.3 644532 29480 ?Sl 11:25 0:00
nm-applet
but there's no icon at the top of the screen.
Of cours
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:28:02PM +0200, poma wrote:
> Then here's a tip, to not waste time with Xfce configs:
> - backup "stuck" user data
> - delete "stuck" user
> - create homonymous user
> - restore backuped data
> - reconfigure Xfce session
Thank you. Pretty much done. It all came back to
On 2015-04-09 20:52, Robin Laing wrote:
Hello,
A Fedora 21 laptop that was working now will not boot.
Fully updated dual boot machine. Windows quit working but Fedora worked
until last night.
Trying to boot today, it won't mount the efi partition. /boot/efi so
the boot process cannot boot pr
On 2015-04-10 10:41, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/09/2015 08:05 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
On 2015-04-02 10:51, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/01/2015 09:44 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
On 2015-03-31 11:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The fedup installati
On 12/04/15 15:43, John Pilkington wrote:
On 12/04/15 14:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/12/15 21:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
It seems to be a bug with the GUI
And the bug is specific to KDE. Tested on a VM. KDE fails, GNOME works.
Since you found it, you can have the honor of submitting the bugzill
> On 04/12/15 15:59, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> Yes, I believe it's about 3 years EOL, and is still 1000 times better
>> than anything they have put since. That's why I still use it on my main
>> system.
>
> And that is all well and good. But, it is the reason why you shouldn't
> hope for a fix.
>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:10:01AM -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>
> Oh I see now, you are assuming the problem is with my old OS instead of
> with Firefox, despite all of the evidence to the contrary.
Did you consider the possibility of a corrupt configuration directory?
Maybe try starting Firefox w
On 04/13/15 00:34, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 12/04/15 15:43, John Pilkington wrote:
>> On 12/04/15 14:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 04/12/15 21:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
It seems to be a bug with the GUI
>>>
>>> And the bug is specific to KDE. Tested on a VM. KDE fails, GNOME works.
>>>
>>> Sin
On 04/13/15 03:10, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> On 04/12/15 15:59, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> Yes, I believe it's about 3 years EOL, and is still 1000 times better
>>> than anything they have put since. That's why I still use it on my main
>>> system.
>> And that is all well and good. But, it is the reason why
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 23:17 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:09 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > Thanks, I was hopeful but it didn't work, even after restarting FF.
> >
> > I believe you want to set
> > services.sync.prefs.sync.security.OCSP.disable_button.managecr
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:10:01AM -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
>>
>> Oh I see now, you are assuming the problem is with my old OS instead
>> of
>> with Firefox, despite all of the evidence to the contrary.
>
> Did you consider the possibility of a corrupt configuration directory?
> Maybe try start
On 12/04/15 21:12, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/13/15 00:34, John Pilkington wrote:
On 12/04/15 15:43, John Pilkington wrote:
On 12/04/15 14:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/12/15 21:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
It seems to be a bug with the GUI
And the bug is specific to KDE. Tested on a VM. KDE fails, G
On 04/12/2015 03:48 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
<<>>
> Does anyone know the right way to make Firefox not auto "upgrade"
> to the new crappy version when it starts up again?
iirc, and presuming you run yum and not yumex, add;
--exclude=firefox*
to command line.
--
peace out.
in a world with ou
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:52:17PM -0500, g wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2015 03:48 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
> <<>>
> > Does anyone know the right way to make Firefox not auto "upgrade"
> > to the new crappy version when it starts up again?
>
> iirc, and presuming you run yum and not yumex, add;
>
> --e
On 04/13/15 06:14, Fred Smith wrote:
> Since the OP is running the Firefox downloaded from mozilla.org (as am I)
> he's asking about how to disable the auto updates Mozilla.org provides.
> I don't KNOW, but I remember digging into the "channel" mechanism a few
> years ago, and vaguely recall there
On 04/12/2015 05:14 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
<<>>
> Since the OP is running the Firefox downloaded from mozilla.org (as
> am I) he's asking about how to disable the auto updates Mozilla.org
> provides.
oops. my chemo brain over looked that fact. ;-)
> I don't KNOW, but I remember digging into the
On 04/13/15 04:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
> You mean like it never crashes for me on F21 but it crashes for you on F14?
> That kind of evidence?
FWIW, I can't even get it to crash on F14.
Just installed F14 from the original DVD, downloaded the latest version of
firefox from mozilla, did an "rpm -
Hi, I've been trying to initialize the Tor bundle; but nothing happens.
I though that it could be the firewall (since I'm using privoxy as
proxy), so I opened firewall-config and I allowed the service, so that's
it, right? Well no. I spend like 30 minutes waiting for a miracle and
the progress bar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I've been trying to initialize the Tor bundle; but nothing happens.
I though that it could be the firewall (since I'm using privoxy as
proxy), so I opened firewall-config and I allowed the service, so that's
it, right? Well no. I spend like 30 minu
Has anyone run fedup to 22?
If yes, any problems with f22?
Thanx.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines:
Only problem with 22 I've run into so far is that there's something wrong
with NFS. Otherwise, everything seems to be fine.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:14 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone run fedup to 22?
>
> If yes, any problems with f22?
>
> Thanx.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedorapr
On 04/13/15 09:14, jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone run fedup to 22?
>
> If yes, any problems with f22?
Since F22 is only in Beta testing, you're question would best be asked on the
testing list
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
Dear List
Could some one tell me what are the partitions that should necessary be
installed on the main hard disk on which Linux is installed ? i,e, that
should not be placed on a mountable partition!
Thanks for any input
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
39 matches
Mail list logo
