Hi,
Created external 500G usb hard drive,
Added ~300G of dirs/files to it
I can see the files from the mounted drive, via the "Computer" icon of
the desktop.
Here's the tricky issue!
I drill down in the drive/dir icon to get the target dir, which has
1000s of files in it. I select a few using t
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:04:47 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> OK, thanks! I am not sure I understood this correctly, but here is what
> I did:
>
> sudo yum update -y (this brings back the new kernel and installs it).
>
> rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2
> posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
> /bin/
On 23.12.2013 03:30, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello, Everyone
> I just ran "yum update" and rebooted. Some time not long after that
> reboot, I started getting message like this:
> Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3
> stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
>
> [...]
>
Chris Murphy writes:
On Dec 22, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
>
>> Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted
partitions.
>>
>> The upgrade stops after "Mounted /boot", and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to
Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent:
> I select a few using the mouse, select the "move to trash" menu item,
> and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a
> refresh/reload, and the files are still there!!
>
> So, just how do I delete files from the external drive!
I
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
> fedora:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html
>
> in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up
> NFS so that *only*
I tried adding the delete option to Nautilus, as well as running the
rm command from the cmdline
find . -name "*Booklist.html*" | xargs rm -f
I've tried all of this as root with no results.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent:
>>
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The OP is not a newbie. He has stated that he has run VBox "since forever"
> and that F20 works fine in virt-manager.
>
> The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under
> virt-manager and is not concentrating
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:52:13 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:04:47 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > OK, thanks! I am not sure I understood this correctly, but here is what
> > I did:
> >
> > sudo yum update -y (this brings back the new kernel and installs it).
> >
> > r
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3
> stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
> Dec 22 20:11:50 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4154.123765] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1
> stuck for 22s! [httpd:1793]
It's the kernel watchdog bailing out. Do you
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, bruce wrote:
question regarding how to remotely auto boot/install into a system..
normal operation:
-1 drive/1 OS
machine gets turned on, boots/starts the OS
but if I want to do a remote/auto/programtic install of a new OS, on
top of the current OS, how the heck can this b
On 12/23/2013 05:52 AM, bruce wrote:
I tried adding the delete option to Nautilus, as well as running the
rm command from the cmdline
find . -name "*Booklist.html*" | xargs rm -f
I've tried all of this as root with no results.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or
John,
I can create new dirs on it, I assume I can create files as well. I'm
assuming it should be read/write/delete...
I've been looking to see exactly how centos/fedora assigns privs/perms
when doing auto mount for external/usb hard drives.
In the nutilus gui for the computer/drive, there is a
On 12/21/2013 11:04 PM, Kostas Sfakiotakis issued this missive:
Hi, back in the early days of CDR media, we used to consider some drives
even incompatible with certain colors. It was a long time ago so if I
recall the dark blue ones were the best choose and the silver the worst.
Where did your el
On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> The OP is not a newbie. He has stated that he has run VBox "since forever"
>> and that F20 works fine in virt-manager.
>>
>> The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it runnin
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:20:53 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install
> > command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for
> > any warning/error it might print.
>
> Thanks!
> $ sudo rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2
>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:16:46PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > The current versions of thunderbird and thunderbird-lightning, namely
> > * thunderbird-24.2.0-2
> > * thunderbird-lightning-2.6.2-3
> > don't seem to be com
On Dec 22, 2013 3:34 PM, "bruce" wrote:
>
> hi guys.
>
> question regarding how to remotely auto boot/install into a system..
>
> normal operation:
> -1 drive/1 OS
> machine gets turned on, boots/starts the OS
>
> but if I want to do a remote/auto/programtic install of a new OS, on
> top of the cu
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:53:40 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:20:53 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > > You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install
> > > command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for
> > > any warning/error i
Quoting Tom H :
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html
in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up
NFS so tha
On Dec 22, 2013 2:49 PM, "David Highley"
wrote:
user for login.
> >
>
> We see by using journalctl -f | less
> That the shell fails to register before a timeout occurs and that there
> is a kernal pool segfault and a core dump. We have not been able to
> determine if they are all related. Except t
"David Highley wrote:"
>
> "David Highley wrote:"
> >
> > After doing a fedup upgrade from Fedora 19 to Fedora 20 the Fedora 19
> > systems are not able to rsync to the Fedora 20 system.
> >
> > If you do:
> > rsync host::
> >
> > You get:
> > rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104)
>
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:01:46 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> sudo /bin/kernel-install add
> 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $?
> grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Great! As expected.
Save a backup of the current grub.cfg file. It may make s
"Pete Travis wrote:"
>
> --===6465155735344206330==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38892b4deff04ee38beb6
>
> --001a11c38892b4deff04ee38beb6
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Dec 22, 2013 2:49 PM, "David Highley"
> wrote:
> user for login.
BOOT SIMPLIFIED - EXTLINUX
BIOS - MBR - 1.PART=SWAP - 2.PART=BOOT(EXT4) - 3.PART=/(EXT4)
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
…
Disklabel type: dos
…
DeviceBoot … Id System
/dev/sda1 … 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda2 * … 83 Linux => boot
/dev/sda3 … 83 Linux => /
# cat /etc/fstab
UUID=…
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:11:13 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>
> > Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup -
> > CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889] Dec 22 20:11:50 afolkey2 kernel:
> > [ 4154.123765] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:02:49 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 23.12.2013 03:30, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> > Hello, Everyone
> > I just ran "yum update" and rebooted. Some time not long after that
> > reboot, I started getting message like this:
> > Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.1
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> No. All non-virtual on this issue...
Ok. How high is the load when this happens?
Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
Hi:
Any idea way the octave-forge package is no longer available in
Fedora, the latest seems to be from Fedora 14.
Kind regards
--
"Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give
in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to
force; never yield to the appar
On Dec 23, 2013 1:22 PM, "David Highley"
wrote:
>
> "Pete Travis wrote:"
...
> > `journalctl _UID=` might be a helpful filter here - similar
to
> > the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors.
>
> OK, we have done this and included the output for a login attempt. The
> abrt tracker is indicating that this
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda
wrote:
> Hi:
> Any idea way the octave-forge package is no longer available in
> Fedora, the latest seems to be from Fedora 14.
According to
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/octave-forge.git/tree/dead.package:
"octave-forge will be repl
Quoting Tom H :
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html
in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up
NFS so tha
On 23 December 2013 20:05, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> According to
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/octave-forge.git/tree/dead.package:
> "octave-forge will be replaced by individual packages"
>
> Perhaps what you're looking for is among:
> % repoquery --qf=%{name} octave-\*
> octave-NLopt
On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Quoting Tom H :
>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
>>> fedora:
>>>
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html
>>>
>
"Pete Travis wrote:"
>
> --===3837768215548578561==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e9d6f7fc3604ee3ba4d1
>
> --001a1135e9d6f7fc3604ee3ba4d1
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Dec 23, 2013 1:22 PM, "David Highley"
> wrote:
> >
> > "Pete Trav
Quoting Ed Greshko :
On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Quoting Tom H :
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
fedora:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html
in t
On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Quoting Ed Greshko :
>
>> On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> Quoting Tom H :
>>>
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
>
> a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
> fedora:
>
Quoting Ed Greshko :
On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Quoting Ed Greshko :
On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Quoting Tom H :
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on
fedora:
https://lis
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> as a quick test, i added "-U" but the only change was that
> "rpcinfo -p" showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted
> for v4 only:
>
> 133 tcp 2049 nfs
> 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl
> 133 udp 2049 nfs
>
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 21:18:32 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:01:46 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > sudo /bin/kernel-install add
> > 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $?
> > grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
>
> Gre
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 12:37 -0500, David wrote:
> On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> > I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under
> > VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD
> > ISO to the VM and install an OS. The problem is that
On 12/24/13 09:31, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 12:37 -0500, David wrote:
>> On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
>>> I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under
>>> VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD
>>> ISO to the VM
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:57:09 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
>
> > No. All non-virtual on this issue...
>
> Ok. How high is the load when this happens?
Didn't check this when it was happening...
> Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups?
Yes:
ke
On Dec 22, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
>
> So, add this resume=/dev/sda2 to the stuff on GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX ? Any
> way to do this without the hardcoding for resume?
/etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to /etc/default/grub. You should use
resume=uuid= and insert the blkid uuid for swap
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'll test further later.
I decided to test for you. :-)
After making the suggested changes.
[root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt
[root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt
192.168.0.196:/home on /mnt type nfs4
(ro,relatime,ver
F20 as a guest, so
~/.VirtualBox/VBoxVMs//Logs/VBox.log
https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Bugtracker
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedo
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> as a quick test, i added "-U" but the only change was that
> "rpcinfo -p" showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted
> for v4 only:
>
> 133 tcp 2049 nfs
> 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl
> 133 udp 2049 nfs
3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 x 2
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 17822 at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1027
ehci_endpoint_reset+0x101/0x110()
clear_halt for a busy endpoint
Call Trace:
[] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
[] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
[] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c
On Dec 23, 2013 4:47 PM, "David Highley"
wrote:
>
> "
>
> OK, I did find those and some old gnome2 stuff. So I went the drastic
> route and wiped out all files and directories with gnome in the name.
> Still get the same results.
>
And with the new user account? This is a crucial test, because tw
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:52:45 -0700 Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
> >
> > So, add this resume=/dev/sda2 to the stuff on GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX ? Any
> > way to do this without the hardcoding for resume?
>
> /etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to /etc/defau
On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> So I will add resume=uuid="" (gigantic
> alphanumeric number) to the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX?
Correct.
> Here is what
> /etc/default/grub reads currently:
>
> GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> FWIW. On my F19 system
>
> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox
> VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -a
> Linux meimei 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 22:21:14 UTC 2013
> x8
Thanks!
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:25:52 -0700 Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
> > So I will add resume=uuid="" (gigantic
> > alphanumeric number) to the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX?
>
> Correct.
>
>
> > Here is what
> > /etc/default/grub reads current
On 12/24/13 13:27, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> FWIW. On my F19 system
>>
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox
>> VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -a
>> Linux meimei 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86
On 12/24/13 14:06, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I guess I'd be interested in the output of
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
And maybe
lshw -C processor | grep width
lscpu | grep "CPU op-mode"
for completeness. :-)
Who knows how VBox goes about making its decisions.
BTW, everything worked fine for me on earlier F
On 24.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> > Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups?
> Yes:
> kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
> Right now I am FINALLY going to remember to reboot into the "offending"
> kernel and see if this happens again.
If you can reproduce this with a vanilla 3
56 matches
Mail list logo
