How should gdm be starting its own pulseaudio process?
I've had an issue since upgrading from Fedora 14 to Fedora 16 in that
after a while, and not on any trigger I've yet identified, my
/var/log/messages starts filling up with:
pulseaudio[pid]: protocol-native.c: Denied access to client
Hi,
Where can i sumit a proposal to Fedora/Redhat to also release a Fedora
18 without secure boot
for users who know how to disable it in the BIOS and for users who has
systems without secure boot?
Not speaking for others but iḿ sure many will not like having the kernel
,moduels locked and co
On 02/06/12 10:30, Edward M wrote:
Hi,
Where can i sumit a proposal to Fedora/Redhat to also release a Fedora
18 without secure boot
for users who know how to disable it in the BIOS and for users who has
systems without secure boot?
Not speaking for others but iḿ sure many will not like having
On 01/06/12 18:54, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
Bob: Take a look here:
http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html Although this site
is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17, and I expect that
the new version will be available within the next few days. It's a bit
like a cafete
On 06/02/2012 02:28 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 02/06/12 10:30, Edward M wrote:
Hi,
Where can i sumit a proposal to Fedora/Redhat to also release a Fedora
18 without secure boot
for users who know how to disable it in the BIOS and for users who has
systems without secure boot?
Not speaking for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I installed ucview to record images from a webcam. It stops recording
after 2,2 GB.
Is that the normal behaviour?
Thanks for lights!
- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Pa
On 02.06.2012, Edward M wrote:
>so i guess i wont have too. just disabled secure boot and fedora 18 will
> be like regular fedora.:-)
Are there machines which contain a BIOS which doesn't allow disabling
this? In this case, you're hosed..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 06/02/2012 04:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Yes, all five of them.
Point taken.
[0] Yes, I found it, it was there all along, I guess I didn't look
hard enough (or didn't listen properly):
http://download.microsoft.com/download/A/D/F/ADF5BEDE-C0FB-4CC0-A3E1-B38093F50BA1/windows8-hardware-ce
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 21:13 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 09:06 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > My downloads are restricted, so I'm pretty much confined to DVD
> > installs. Anyone have a favorite DVD supplier?
> Purchase installation media for Fedora from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribu
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 11:23 +0800, Zhangsan wrote:
> It worked correctly, but I found it was downloading the packages of
> the [fedora] repo from the "development" directory actually by the
> following
>
> message:
>
>
>
> http://ftp.neowiz.com/fedora/development/17/x86_64/os/repodata/ddcb2f6
Once upon a time, Heinz Diehl said:
> On 02.06.2012, Edward M wrote:
> >so i guess i wont have too. just disabled secure boot and fedora 18 will
> > be like regular fedora.:-)
>
> Are there machines which contain a BIOS which doesn't allow disabling
> this? In this case, you're hosed..
Sinc
Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC# ? the
printer is setup with Static IP.
The problem I'm having eveytime the power goes out the Router changes
DHCP IP and I have to go into Fedora and make IP s
> How do you mean "openly"? It can't get much more open that a mandatory
> interface that let's you do it simply. What UEFI could do to make
> things better is standardize the UI, but that's it.
As I already said UEFI cannot do that. UEFI is deliberately engineered
not to have the ability to s
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:11:38 +0200
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 02.06.2012, Edward M wrote:
>
> >so i guess i wont have too. just disabled secure boot and fedora 18 will
> > be like regular fedora.:-)
>
> Are there machines which contain a BIOS which doesn't allow disabling
> this? In this case,
Once upon a time, Alan Cox said:
> > > Imagine the gall – wanting to be able to boot a custom kernel.
> >
> > Easy, sign it yourself. We went over it a hundred times now. If you
> > can build a kernel you can sign a million of them.
>
> With what. You can't create a suitable key.
You can cre
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:10:34AM -0400, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
>
> In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC# ? the
> printer is setup with Static IP.
>
> The problem I'm having eveytime the power goes out the Rou
On 06/02/2012 04:34 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Well the math doesn't compute here, it's cryptographically impossible.
I mean you could sign a shim that won't verify the integrity of the boot
There you go.
Look I can't really go on on that. You seem to imply that this is a bad
thing. I simp
Jim:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Jim wrote:
Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC# ? the
printer is setup with Static IP.
The problem I'm having eveytime the power goes out the Router changes
DHCP IP and
On 02/06/12 14:25, Chris Adams wrote:
Since the Microsoft Windows 8 certification requires that the UEFI
firmware (not BIOS) support disabling Secure Boot by the user on x86
systems, I don't think you'll find many (if any) systems that don't
support disabling Secure Boot.
Does anyone know i
On 06/02/2012 05:50 PM, Steve Dowe wrote:
Does anyone know if the signed bootloader must be executed first before
Secure Book can be disabled?
Or would one just enter a BIOS-like config screen before any disc
activity and disable it?
Surely you can access the UEFI firmware interface before the
On 06/02/2012 10:10 AM, Jim wrote:
Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC# ? the printer
is setup with Static IP.
The problem I'm having eveytime the power goes out the Router changes DHCP IP
and I have
> Yes, but for that, the firmware will either need support from the OS it
> secure-boots, to go out on the network, check for revocations, and upload
> them into firmware; or the firmware itself must implement a bare-bones
> network stack, initialize the onboard NIC, obtain a DHCP address, or
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:30:11 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
> > How do you mean "openly"? It can't get much more open that a
> > mandatory interface that let's you do it simply. What UEFI could
> > do to make things better is standardize the UI, but that's it.
>
> As I already said UEFI cannot do that.
On 06/02/2012 05:47 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
Unfortunately only one of these have Fedora 17 for sale in North America
at the moment, and that one takes more money than necessary since they
will only sell you a 4 Disc set.
Just wait a week or two, and the other vendors will catch up. Besides,
On 06/02/2012 08:35 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
Anyway, this would only affect OEMs and Windows users who want to
install their copy of Windows on machines they assemble themselves (or
in any way non-approved by Microsoft). Do we really care about them?
I sure do! The only PC's I've ever owned
On 06/02/2012 08:51 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
Surely you can access the UEFI firmware interface before the boot
loader, just like the BIOS SETUP yes.
Changing it in the UEFI interface before boot sounds much more
reasonable, but please don't call me "Shirley."
--
users mailing list
users@list
On 06/02/2012 10:08 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/02/2012 08:35 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
Anyway, this would only affect OEMs and Windows users who want to
install their copy of Windows on machines they assemble themselves (or
in any way non-approved by Microsoft). Do we really care about them?
On 06/02/2012 11:29 AM, fred smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:10:34AM -0400, Jim wrote:
Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC# ? the
printer is setup with Static IP.
The problem I'm having eve
I've just been going through my new install tweaking
checklist, and when I checked what services were enabled
I found my new f17 install had both syslog.service and
rsyslog.service enabled.
Does that make sense?
I only see rsyslog.service enabled in fedora 16.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
This morning, I was doing a system update using yumex while I was
cooking breakfast. When I got back, the system was hung so badly that I
had to use the reset button. The system came back up fine, so I opened
a terminal and tried this:
su -c yum-complete-transaction
After thinking things ov
Am 02.06.2012 20:55, schrieb Tom Horsley:
> I've just been going through my new install tweaking
> checklist, and when I checked what services were enabled
> I found my new f17 install had both syslog.service and
> rsyslog.service enabled.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> I only see rsyslog.servic
Hi,
>>> Now, if your partition table starts at sector 63, you're still boned. But
>>
>> Nope. You can do it by hand.
>
> confirmed
>
> i moved /boot to 4096 to have peace the next years
> on > 20 F15 installs before upgrade to F16
Can you describe how you did this? Is this during the install and
> 3. Create your own keys and sign your own shim/grub2/kernel and remove
> MS'es keys.
And how are you going to add your own keys to the firmware ? There is no
requirement for EFI to support this in anything I've seen so far.
Hopefully everyone will.
Also btw I wouldn't bet on removing the Micro
> Can you describe how you did this? Is this during the install and
> before reboot? Basically copy it, unmount, shorten it to begin at 4096
> with fdisk, remake filesystem, remount, then copy contents back?
>
> Afterwards, you would re-run "grub2-install /dev/sda" correct?
Don't bother. You don'
Hi,
I just did an install of fc17 x86_64 on a box with 4 SATA 250GB disks
and set up the partitions manually. I created /boot on sda as one
500MB partition, then two RAID partitions using the rest of the
contents of the disks. The first is a RAID1 with four disks for root
and the rest is /var.
Is
Am 02.06.2012 21:36, schrieb Alex:
> Hi,
>
Now, if your partition table starts at sector 63, you're still boned. But
>>>
>>> Nope. You can do it by hand.
>>
>> confirmed
>>
>> i moved /boot to 4096 to have peace the next years
>> on > 20 F15 installs before upgrade to F16
>
> Can you descr
Hi,
>> Can you describe how you did this? Is this during the install and
>> before reboot? Basically copy it, unmount, shorten it to begin at 4096
>> with fdisk, remake filesystem, remount, then copy contents back?
>>
>> Afterwards, you would re-run "grub2-install /dev/sda" correct?
>
> Don't both
> Is there a command-line gparted or is it no longer possible to edit
> the partition table from the command-line?
I've not really looked
> Why is there a mixture of old fdisk and new GPT disk layout?
GPT is the newer disk format for the EFI world and even bigger disks. It
fixes most of the insa
Am 02.06.2012 21:59, schrieb Alex:
> Hi,
>
>>> Can you describe how you did this? Is this during the install and
>>> before reboot? Basically copy it, unmount, shorten it to begin at 4096
>>> with fdisk, remake filesystem, remount, then copy contents back?
>>>
>>> Afterwards, you would re-run "g
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:36:02 -0700, sergiocmailbox-fedorausers wrote:
> --- Em qui, 31/5/12, Beartooth escreveu:
>> Where can I tell F17 under fxce if
>> possible) I want it to automount any disk I put into a drive?? (In
>> addition to its own internal drive for removable media, each machin
Thibault Nélis writes:
On 06/02/2012 04:34 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Well the math doesn't compute here, it's cryptographically impossible.
I mean you could sign a shim that won't verify the integrity of the boot
There you go.
Look I can't really go on on that. You seem to imply that this
> > grub2-install /dev/sda
>
> Okay, so you're saying that it's okay to set up the partitions
> manually and don't worry about the moving /boot, right?
If you've previously set up a RAID1 /boot (eg with older Fedora when it
worked fine or by hand)
> Is there any support for installing grub on a
Alan Cox writes:
> Yes, but for that, the firmware will either need support from the OS it
> secure-boots, to go out on the network, check for revocations, and upload
> them into firmware; or the firmware itself must implement a bare-bones
> network stack, initialize the onboard NIC, obtain a DH
On 06/02/2012 01:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Should be interesting to see how the great unwashed will accept waiting
2-3 minutes for their PC to boot, while their firmware is trying to grab
CRLs over the network.
Even more interesting will be seeing how they react to the idea that
their lap
Hi,
>> Okay, so you're saying that it's okay to set up the partitions
>> manually and don't worry about the moving /boot, right?
>
> If you've previously set up a RAID1 /boot (eg with older Fedora when it
> worked fine or by hand)
Is this because it used to be the case that /boot was created afte
> > The firmware already has this.
>
> Yes, now my mental cobwebs are getting cleaned out. I do recall reading
> about this, a while ago.
Much of it is there for network booting (PXE etc) and in fact a fair bit
of it is there in the modern old style BIOS too.
>
> > > Before it boots the OS.
>
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:49:29 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
> > 3. Create your own keys and sign your own shim/grub2/kernel and
> > remove MS'es keys.
>
> And how are you going to add your own keys to the firmware ? There is
> no requirement for EFI to support this in anything I've seen so far.
> Hopeful
> > Remove the MS key and the firmware won't be signed. I doubt you can
> > re-sign any flash firmware. That's probably only a problem for the
> > paranoid because any government approved spyware from the FBI etc is
> > presumably going to use the Microsoft key by default.
>
> See above.
It's no
On 06/02/2012 02:29 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
It's not that simple. If you remove the Microsoft key and that is the key
for your video card then you can add your own keys but when you boot in
secure mode you won't have a display omn your plug in video card because
the video firmware won't have been sig
On 06/02/2012 01:03 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Is there a command-line gparted or is it no longer possible to edit
the partition table from the command-line?
I've not really looked
Well, parted is the command line mode
and gparted is the gui mode.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Every time I go to a web site that has a video
to play, pulseaudio racks up 20% of cpu even
if I do not play the video.
Playing the video, I get
plugin-container racks up 24.0% of cpu, and
pulseaudio racks up another 15.5% of cpu.
I kill the tab of the web page, and pulseaudio
cpu load goes way d
A friend of mine and I have both noticed that access to some -- but not
all -- web sites has become much slower recently. Some sites time out,
others hang, apparently while waiting for ads to load; a bad guy may be
meebo. I have no trouble with Google and most technical sites; NY times
is erratic
On 06/02/2012 03:08 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
A friend of mine and I have both noticed that access to some -- but not
all -- web sites has become much slower recently. Some sites time out,
others hang, apparently while waiting for ads to load; a bad guy may be
meebo. I have no trouble with Go
On 2012/06/02 13:27, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/02/2012 01:22 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Should be interesting to see how the great unwashed will accept waiting
2-3 minutes for their PC to boot, while their firmware is trying to grab
CRLs over the network.
Even more interesting will be seeing how
On 06/02/2012 04:01 PM, jdow wrote:
.
.
.
snip
If you can declare the OS is secure by
means of the Microsoft certificate, how much money would it take to make
Microsoft geek to including a backdoor for the NSA?
{o.o} Just sayin'
But that would be no different than how things are now!!
--
use
> means of the Microsoft certificate, how much money would it take to make
> Microsoft geek to including a backdoor for the NSA?
I would assume they have one. One of the problems with this is presumably
they need to sign tools for every law enforcement agency with reasonable
claim - be that Israel
Hi,
>> Is there a command-line gparted or is it no longer possible to edit
>> the partition table from the command-line?
>
> I've not really looked
It's just parted for the command-line version. Thanks JD.
>> Why is there a mixture of old fdisk and new GPT disk layout?
>
> GPT is the newer disk
I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
It has no signature.
I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
Hi,
How do I go about requesting another install option "Minimal Desktop"?
I'm finding myself removing a lot of packages after Graphical desktop
install.
TIA,
Tommy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:30:43PM -0400, Jim wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 11:29 AM, fred smith wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:10:34AM -0400, Jim wrote:
> >>Fedora 17, I have my Network printer setup and printing in Fedora.
> >>
> >>In DD-WRT how do I setup a Network Printer as a Static IP or MAC#
On 06/03/2012 09:09 AM, JD wrote:
> I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
> It has no signature.
> I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> but rpm exits with error message:
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be inst
On 06/03/2012 02:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
Hi,
How do I go about requesting another install option "Minimal Desktop"?
I'm finding myself removing a lot of packages after Graphical desktop
install.
TIA,
Tommy
"Base" or something like that
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, June 1, 2012 7:21 pm, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> How did you install the kernel? The initrd image that's created
> by the stock kernel RPM should include the necessary LVM voodoo
By installing from the install DVD, then by yum running from the rescue
mode of the install DVD.
Eventually I got
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I *think* the problem sits with the person/group who produced th
>
> Ah, of course, thanks. I believe the two disks were previously
> partitioned using fdisk. This must be the reason why I had a mixture
> of GPT and fdisk layouts on the four disks.
The reason for this, is that you can have a hybrid GPT partition, which
also has MBR signatures for older bioses
On 06/02/2012 07:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 09:09 AM, JD wrote:
I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
It has no signature.
I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error:
On 06/03/2012 11:23 AM, JD wrote:
> rpm -qp xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
You have a corrupt rpm.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be miss
On 06/02/2012 08:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I *think* the problem s
On 06/02/2012 08:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:23 AM, JD wrote:
rpm -qp xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
You have a corrupt rpm.
Not really. It is not a fedora
On 06/02/2012 11:17 PM, William Brown wrote:
Ah, of course, thanks. I believe the two disks were previously
partitioned using fdisk. This must be the reason why I had a mixture
of GPT and fdisk layouts on the four disks.
The reason for this, is that you can have a hybrid GPT partition, which
als
On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
> Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
Noreally
Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will not
return
an error.
An unsigned rpm will simply return the name of the rpm.
A signed rpm will return information ab
On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
>> Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
> Noreally
>
> Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will
> not return
> an error.
>
> An unsigned rpm will simply return the n
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:27 PM, john maclean
wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 02:34 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do I go about requesting another install option "Minimal Desktop"?
>> I'm finding myself removing a lot of packages after Graphical desktop
>> install.
>>
>> TIA,
>> Tommy
>
>
> "Ba
After power cycle on system the line drivers for the network interface
seemed to die, no link connection and no light. This is a mother board
interface and dmesg still shows hardware discovery.
Bought a PCI Express card and installed it. Then modified the mac
address in the /etc/sysconfig/networki
On 06/02/2012 08:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
Noreally
Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will not
return
an error.
An unsigned
On 06/03/2012 12:39 PM, JD wrote:
> But Ed, as I replied to another OP,
> I mounted an old fc14 dd image, I copied the src rpm to
> the fc14 mount point's /tmp, I chrooted to the mount point
> and ran rpm -qlp, and it worked just fine. All the files were
> listed.
> No error messages at all.
You
On 06/02/2012 09:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:39 PM, JD wrote:
But Ed, as I replied to another OP,
I mounted an old fc14 dd image, I copied the src rpm to
the fc14 mount point's /tmp, I chrooted to the mount point
and ran rpm -qlp, and it worked just fine. All the files were
listed
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 15:20 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> "Mandatory. On non-ARM systems, the platform MUST implement the
> ability for a physically present user to select between two Secure
> Boot modes in firmware setup: "Custom" and "Standard".
I'm curious about other differences that might occur
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
> D: Expected size: 9392994 = lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
> D: Actual size: 9392994
> warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 2e1efa87:
> NOKEY
> xfdr-2.0.1.x86_64
> D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
> D
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 12:04 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I kept an eye on the terminal to see what was going on, and it's a
> good thing, because suddenly it began spewing all sorts of packages
> that it was going to erase. I used ^C to kill it because I didn't
> want my system hosed.
And this is why
On 06/02/2012 11:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
D: Expected size: 9392994 = lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
D: Actual size: 9392994
warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 2e1efa87:
NOKEY
xfdr-2.0.1.x86_64
D: closed db
On 06/02/2012 11:15 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 11:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
D: Expected size: 9392994 =
lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
D: Actual size: 9392994
warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID
2e1efa87: NOK
On 06/03/2012 02:15 PM, JD wrote:
> D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb
> error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
> D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
> D: closed db index /var/lib/
83 matches
Mail list logo
