On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote: >> Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated. > No....really.... > > Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will > not return > an error. > > An unsigned rpm will simply return the name of the rpm. > > A signed rpm will return information about the signing key. > > Here is an rpm from OpenSuse.... > > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qp glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm > warning: glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID > 307e3d54: NOKEY > glibc-2.9-4.6.i686 > > Here is an rpm that I build and did not sign. > > [egreshko@meimei i686]$ rpm -qp gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686.rpm > gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686 >
You can even try with -qpvv and get more details. On the rpm that is not signed you'd see.... D: gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686.rpm: Header SHA1 digest: OK (954c4933349557bacb137d0b6b6d6db0f2096032) gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686 on a signed rpm for which the key exists in key store you'd see D: zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID a82ba4b7: OK zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686 on a signed rpm for which the key doesn't exist in key store you'd see D: Actual size: 1573302 warning: glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 307e3d54: NOKEY glibc-2.9-4.6.i686 Notice the difference between "OK" and "NOKEY"? -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on the joke of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
