Nvidia Resolution settings ?

2012-04-20 Thread binarynut
F17-beta installed kmod-nvidia and blacklisted nouveau . restarting computer and resolution is so high that characters are so small at Desktop you can't see them. Checked Xorg.conf and the only setting is the Device Section no settings for Resolution. What do I put in there for 1280x764 ? D

XFCE Login Freeze

2012-04-20 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hi list, We have a multi-workstation network, with several nodes running F16/XFCE on remote-mounted home directories. All users can log in and out without any difficulty except one. This user gives name and password but then freezes indefinitely. 'ps' shows a variety of tasks running, but nothi

EXIM, Postgresql and database replication

2012-04-20 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi folks, I am rolling out another Exim mail server into a new site that I am setting up. Based on replies from last week I am going to look into using Postgresql instead of flat files for aliases etc. I have a couple of questions. My aim is to roll this out to my 3 existing mail servers if I

Re: EXIM, Postgresql and database replication

2012-04-20 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am rolling out another Exim mail server into a new site that I am setting > up.  Based on replies from last week I am going to look into using Postgresql > instead of flat files for aliases etc.  I have a couple of questions.

Re: Nvidia Resolution settings ?

2012-04-20 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 04:04 -0400, binary...@comcast.net wrote: > F17-beta Wrong list... > installed kmod-nvidia and blacklisted nouveau . > > restarting computer and resolution is so high that characters are so > small at Desktop you can't see them. To which the good way to fix up tiny fonts

Re: Nvidia Resolution settings ?

2012-04-20 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:04 AM, wrote: > F17-beta > installed kmod-nvidia and blacklisted nouveau . > > restarting computer and resolution is so high that characters are so small > at Desktop you can't see them. > > Checked Xorg.conf and the only setting is the Device Section no settings for > R

Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Davi Garcia
Hi all, I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my system. I think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing" repository. Does any one know if this is expected? The output below shows "yum update --skip-broken". Packages skipped because of dependency

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/21/2012 12:09 AM, Davi Garcia wrote: > I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my > system. I > think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing" repository. > Does > any one know if this is expected? The output below shows "yum update > --skip

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On 20/04/12 17:09, Davi Garcia wrote: Hi all, Aside from posting to the wrong-list, what the problem? Did you check is Samba4 the Alpha? f17 is currently at Beta not alpha. Correct List for test-builds: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/ -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars"

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.04.2012 18:09, schrieb Davi Garcia: > Hi all, > > I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my > system. I think someone pushed some Alpha > packages to the "updates-testing" repository. Does any one know if this is > expected? The output below shows "yum > up

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On 20/04/12 17:17, Reindl Harald wrote: first you are using a beta version of fedora additionally you are using updates-testing on a beta-release That is normal Fedora practice for pre-GA Branched. fedora.repo & updates-testing.repo which on GA, updates-testing.repo gets disabled, updates.repo

Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
Hello list, I've just installed the beta in a VM so as to evaluate GNOME 3.4 (and Fedora-17 as well). Two irritating issues have emerged that would be show stoppers, if incapable of resolution. They are: 1. I choose United Kingdom (English) for the obvious reason - I live here - and I appear

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On 20/04/12 17:27, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: a little help would be appreciated. Here you go: Correct List for test-builds: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/ -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

ath9k with hostapd and iPad / iPhone

2012-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi has somebody "magic settings" to get Apple mobile-crap working with hostapd instead permanently interrupt the connection? other mobile devices are working fine all the time up to 80 Mbit netto and only recent iPhone / iPad is running in trouble no these are not my devices but my AP :-( the "

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Patrick Lists
On 04/20/2012 06:27 PM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: 2.I installed an HP printer via the Printers dialogue and I cannot find any way to set paper sizes to A4. Try running system-config-printer Regards, Patrick -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscrip

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 13:09:45 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote: Hi all, I'm using Fedora 17 on my workstation but I'm having issue to upgrade my system. I think someone pushed some Alpha packages to the "updates-testing" repository. Does any one know if this is expected? The output below shows "yu

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Davi Garcia
Hi all, Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better: I never decided to install Samba or Samba4 in my workstation, these packages were installed by default. I know that I'm using F17 that is still in beta, b

Re: Fedora 17 beta not supporting rsolutions above 1024x768 in Nouveau

2012-04-20 Thread Rick Stevens
On 04/19/2012 04:37 PM, Jim wrote: Fedora 17 beta can't get any resolution above 1024x768 with Nouveau driver, I need at least 1280x768 to display fullscreen on 42" TV monitor, worked ok on F14. Please take F17 discussions to t...@lists.fedoraproject.org. F17 is not yet released and as such not

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:27:36 +0100 Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > 2.I installed an HP printer via the Printers dialogue and I cannot find > any way to set paper sizes to A4. The weird thing is in the US, I constantly run into printers all defaulting to A4 when I want US-Letter. I think there must

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:27:36 +0100 Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: 2.I installed an HP printer via the Printers dialogue and I cannot find any way to set paper sizes to A4. The weird thing is in the US, I constantly run into printers all defaulting to A4 wh

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:09:42 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > Will that necessarily work? > It seems to me that you could have a situation in which libreoffice > believes in A4, but the printer still believes in Letter. True, you have to get everyone on the same page (groan :-). You may need

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 20/04/12 17:30, Frank Murphy wrote: On 20/04/12 17:27, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: a little help would be appreciated. Here you go: Correct List for test-builds: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/ I take it from your response that you think the issue is specific to a test b

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 20/04/12 17:31, Patrick Lists wrote: On 04/20/2012 06:27 PM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: 2.I installed an HP printer via the Printers dialogue and I cannot find any way to set paper sizes to A4. Try running system-config-printer Regards, Patrick I'll give it a go. Thanks. Peter HB -- us

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Joe Zeff
On 04/20/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I take it from your response that you think the issue is specific to a test build and not generic? It's quite possible that it is because if it were, as you phrase it, generic, it probably would have been reported long ago and fixed. And,

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:42 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list > and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better: > > I never decided to install Samba or Samba4 in my workstation, these > packages were inst

Re: Problem with Yum to upgrade Fedora 17.

2012-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 15:34 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:42 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list > > and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better: > > > > I never decide

Re: ath9k with hostapd and iPad / iPhone

2012-04-20 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 20.04.2012, Reindl Harald wrote: > has somebody "magic settings" to get Apple mobile-crap > working with hostapd instead permanently interrupt the > connection? Ath9k and interrupted connections? Kernel 3.3.1 (vanilla) has a bug which can cause this, see: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-w

Re: ath9k with hostapd and iPad / iPhone

2012-04-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.04.2012 22:08, schrieb Heinz Diehl: > On 20.04.2012, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> has somebody "magic settings" to get Apple mobile-crap >> working with hostapd instead permanently interrupt the >> connection? > > Ath9k and interrupted connections? Kernel 3.3.1 (vanilla) has a bug which can

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 12:09 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > It seems to me that you could have a situation in which libreoffice > believes in A4, but the printer still believes in Letter. > > When I had application/printer mismatch problems, > it was usually because the application > believed in

Re: system-config-users and ldapi

2012-04-20 Thread Braden McDaniel
On 4/19/12 9:16 AM, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:37 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:09 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 22:03 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: Can system-config-users be made to use ldapi (i.e., a socket connection to an LDAP se

Re: Fedora-17 Irritations

2012-04-20 Thread Peter Hillier-Brook
On 20/04/12 19:01, Joe Zeff wrote: On 04/20/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I take it from your response that you think the issue is specific to a test build and not generic? It's quite possible that it is because if it were, as you phrase it, generic, it probably would have been r

ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Sam Varshavchik
For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. eth0 is managed by NetworkManager, and uses dhcp. I know that if I get rid of NetworkManager and put static IP addresses in ifcfg-eth0, I can also sprinkle some magic dust into ifcfg-eth0:1, and have the second IP address come u

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Tommy Pham
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. > > eth0 is managed by NetworkManager, and uses dhcp. > > I know that if I get rid of NetworkManager and put static IP addresses in > ifcfg-eth0, I can also sprinkle some magic

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/21/2012 11:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. > > eth0 is managed by NetworkManager, and uses dhcp. > > I know that if I get rid of NetworkManager and put static IP addresses in > ifcfg-eth0, I can also sprinkle some magic dust into

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Tommy Pham
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/21/2012 11:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. >> >> eth0 is managed by NetworkManager, and uses dhcp. >> >> I know that if I get rid of NetworkManager and put static IP addresse

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/21/2012 12:55 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 04/21/2012 11:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >>> For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. >>> >>> eth0 is managed by NetworkManager, and uses dhcp. >>> >>> I know that if I ge

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Tommy Pham
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 04/21/2012 12:55 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 04/21/2012 11:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: For testing purposes I need to add a second IP address to eth0. eth0 is managed b

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Tommy Pham
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 04/21/2012 12:55 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/21/2012 11:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > For testing purposes I need to a

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/21/2012 01:30 PM, Tommy Pham wrote: > You're right about the doc and NetworkManager... I had to set it to no > and bring down the service to make it work... But then I'm using F17 > beta so maybe NM is broken??? > > [root@fedora network-scripts]# ls ifcfg-p14* > ifcfg-p14p1 ifcfg-p14p1:1 >

Re: ifcfg-ethX voodoo for a second IP on the same interface

2012-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/21/2012 01:41 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > You're right about the doc and NetworkManager... I had to set it to no > > and bring down the service to make it work... But then I'm using F17 > > beta so maybe NM is broken??? No, AFAIK, NM won't handle that type of configuration. You either do it th