On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:42 -0300, Davi Garcia wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all feedback! Sorry about post question to the wrong list > and about my poor problem description. Let me try explain better: > > I never decided to install Samba or Samba4 in my workstation, these > packages were installed by default. I know that I'm using F17 that is > still in beta, but I didn't know that alpha packages were being pushed > to that repository. My problem is basically that Yum is not able to > upgrade my system without use "--skip-broken". > > Since Ed Greshko confirmed that is a known issue, I'll wait the fix. > What is very confusing is why do we have alpha packages in a beta > repo? > > Again, sorry about any inconvenience.
Yes, the problem here is that some samba4 packages were pushed to updates-testing that are marked as Obsoleting or otherwise replacing their samba 3.x counterpart. This is bad, and anyone hitting this issue should be adding negative karma to the update (as I am about to do).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
