Re: Network connection in fc14

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Since I upgrade from fc13 to fc14, I cannot connect to the network ! > > I get: > > Bringing up loopback interface:                            [  OK  ] > Bringing up interface eth0:  Active connection state: activating > Active conn

Re: f14 gnome unusable

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Eggers
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:27:48 -0500, Steve Berg wrote: >> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=253668 >> >> Quoting the relevant bit: >> Update - apparently this issue is related to the GTK theme in use. The >> default (Fedora, or Clearlooks, or a few others) results in this slow >> behav

Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread J B
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > ... > So what may be going on here? I have lots of packages from seemingly > different releases. But do note that this system started from a fresh > install of Fedora 13 ... I never had an earlier version installed. > > # rpm -qa | grep fc11 | wc -l > 1 > > # r

Re: FC12 - Thunderbird update fails

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Its in updates-testing.  It was quite a few packages when I installed it > just prior to upgrading to F14 I believe it is now fixed in the updates repo - so try again and it should work. -- mike c -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM, J B wrote: > Some of the earlier packages (F11, etc) may come from e.g. rpmfusion-* repos, > if > you have them enabled, that are required by current F14 packages, e.g. vlc. I'm not familiar with the rpmfusion repos, what are they? > Start with Fc11 above > # rp

Re: OT: Evolution signature script

2010-11-05 Thread Hiisi
pe, 2010-11-05 kello 07:33 +0800, Ed Greshko kirjoitti: > Since you asked. > > It has been a long time tradition/recommendation/request that signatures > be kept to no more than 5 lines when posting to mailing lists. So, > while you may enjoy a 17 line signature with ASCII art it may not win

[OT] OOo question (weird effect with extensions)

2010-11-05 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, I have some weird effect in F14 with some OOo extensions: Installing them as normal user, and calling File>New>"Templates and Documents" in OOo, then my CPU spins fully for about 5-6 secs, then the Templates and Documents window is opened. If then selecting some offered template, I have the sa

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:30 -0400, Deron Meranda wrote: > So what may be going on here? I have lots of packages from seemingly > different releases. But do note that this system started from a fresh > install of Fedora 13 ... I never had an earlier version installed. That is normal. For any relea

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Deron Meranda wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:25 AM, J B wrote: >> Some of the earlier packages (F11, etc) may come from e.g. rpmfusion-* >> repos, if >> you have them enabled, that are required by current F14 packages, e.g. vlc. > > I'm not familiar with the rp

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > ... > That dependency makes no sense to me. Why would gnome depend > on an Apache module? Try to understand: $ gnome-user-share $ mod_dnssd Perhaps you do not want to have/need gnome-user-share package ? With regard to various repos: $ yum repolist all and mak

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
You could try "package-cleanup --dupes" or "packages-cleanup --problems" to look for problems in the RPM database. What happens if you do "yum reinstall tzdata" or yum distro-sync tzdata"? If the latter works, you could try "yum distro-sync" to try to get the current version of all packages. -- u

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:45 AM, JB wrote: > Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >> That dependency makes no sense to me. Why would gnome depend >> on an Apache module? > > Try to understand: > $ gnome-user-share > $ mod_dnssd > Perhaps you do not want to have/need gnome-user-share package ?

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
JB gmail.com> writes: > ... > Try to understand: > $ gnome-user-share > $ mod_dnssd > Perhaps you do not want to have/need gnome-user-share package ? I meant: $ yum info gnome-user-share $ yum info mod_dnssd :-) JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or chan

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > ... So, now for a good measure: # yum clean all # yum check-update # yum update JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: htt

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:12 AM, JB wrote: > So, now for a good measure: > # yum clean all > # yum check-update > # yum update Nothing to do. # yum clean all Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit, verify Cleaning repos: fedora updates Cleaning up Everything 0 delta-package file

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... What I have installed: * tzdata-2010n-1.fc13.noarch (version 2010n) What is on the Fedora 14 DVD: * tzdata-2010k-1.fc14.noarch (version 2010k) and there don't appear to be any F14 updates for tzdata yet (using yum list available).

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: > Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... yum distribution-synchronization This will leave you with what is in the F14 repos -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread JB
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > > # yum clean all > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit, verify > Cleaning repos: fedora updates > Cleaning up Everything > 0 delta-package files removed, by presto Well, watch your steps :-) > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refres

Quite a nice review of f14

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/03/fedora_14_review/ -- mike c -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: >> Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... > > > yum distribution-synchronization > > This will leave you with what is in the F14 repos That looks like it wants to downgrade severa

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On 05/11/10 08:40, Deron Meranda wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: >>> Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... >> >> >> yum distribution-synchronization >> >> This will leave you with what is in the F14 re

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > F14 was done without a "mass rebuild" to rename fc13 to fc14. > > If you find something breaks because of a newer fc13, you may need to > downgrade, otherwise if not broken. Maybe let them play together. I understand now, thanks. I just wasn't

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Frank Murphy gmail.com> wrote: > > On 05/11/10 08:25, Deron Meranda wrote: > >> Investigating just a little more, using the tzdata package... > > > > > > yum distribution-synchronization > > > > This will leave you with what

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > On my cleanly installed and updated F14 x86_64 box, the correct versions of > the > above packages are And I've included what I have afterward in [brackets]... > apr-util-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64[-1.3.10-1.fc13.x86_64] > apr-util-devel-1.3.

Re: Quite a nice review of f14

2010-11-05 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:38 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/03/fedora_14_review/ Another ones... Fedora 14 is Leading Edge Linux http://www.pcworld.com/article/209689/itworld_review_fedora_14_is_leadingedge_linux.html Cloud and virtualization features set Fedora 1

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes: > apr-util-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 > apr-util-devel-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 > apr-util-ldap-1.3.9-3.fc13.x86_64 > info-4.13a-10.fc14.x86_64 > orc-0.4.6-1.fc14.x86_64 > orc-0.4.6-1.fc14.i686 > perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.14-7.fc14.noarch > texinfo-4.13a-10.fc14.x86_64 > te

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Deron Meranda gmail.com> writes: > I guess "ideally" didn't happen :) Because I definitely have newer packages > installed under Fedora 13 than I would get if syncing to Fedora 14. > > Is this caused by just luck that the same upstream patches made it > though to F13 updates before it did to F1

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Boy
Am Donnerstag, den 04.11.2010, 10:08 -0700 schrieb Joe Zeff: > The point isn't that you can make the OO.org version work in Fedora but > that you shouldn't have to. Just because they decided to make > LiberOffice the default is no reason to remove OpenOffice from the > repos. > You're suppo

Re: Fedora 14 mac mini

2010-11-05 Thread Jurgen Kramer
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 09:45 +1100, Chris Smart wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Shelby, James wrote: > > After installing Fedora 14 it will be unable to find the SATA drives. The > > solution I found is to install grub2 (not sure why I needed to do this but > > it resolved the boot load

Emacs working again ME in fedora 14

2010-11-05 Thread Colin Paul Adams
> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang S Rupprecht writes: Wolfgang> Tom Horsley writes: >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:07:02 +0100 >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >>> > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1409936 >>> >>> Cannot confirm that. Running Emacs as root after lo

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Peter Boy wrote: > OpenOffice might share its fortune with XFree86 and you really will not > interested to use it anymore. > > That's the way OSS works. > Peter Quite on the contrary: I believe OpenOffice.org will live on, no matter if LibreOffice grows. Just as S

Re: Emacs working again ME in fedora 14

2010-11-05 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:53:25 + Colin Paul Adams wrote: > It's working completely fine for me this morning. Yep. While it always worked for me, the big spew of error messages when I start it is now gone. There were a small handful of updates, maybe gnome-keyring was the one that did it? Nothin

Flashing images

2010-11-05 Thread Antonio M
After F14 installation, I note that moving images now are flashing on some web pages For example, have a look at http://www.campingmonterosa.com I checked on other Os's and they are fine. Where is the bug?? -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : amontag52 SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net -- users mailing li

Fedora14 install to partition from running system

2010-11-05 Thread Terry Barnaby
Is it possible to install Fedora14 onto a spare partition from DVD on a running Fedora12 system ? I have two separate 30G partitions on my systems to allow two Fedora versions to be installed. I normally install a new Fedora onto the alternate partition allowing a boot back to the old system in cas

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Boy
Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 08:07 -0300 schrieb Fernando Cassia: > The truth will be seen when both LO and OpenOffice.org start diverging > and when Oracle decides to put several hundred developers to work on > the next major version number full time, if Ubuntu/Fedora and hobbyist > programmers in

Preupgrading headless remote systems

2010-11-05 Thread Steve Berg
So far I've had very good luck with preupgrade for 12 to 14 and 13 to 14 systems. There's one annoyance that is causing me some headache. I have a couple of systems that are headless and remote that I'd like to do a preupgrade on but I can't seem to get things started without some local keyboard

sort wierdness

2010-11-05 Thread Neil Bird
I am seeing sort treat '@' specially; in particular, it wanders around the sort order depending upon the rest of the input line. Anyone have an explanation? I guess it's something to do with locale, but the input strings affecting it as well make no sense to me. $ locale LANG=en_GB.UTF-8

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Fernando Cassia said: > The truth will be seen when both LO and OpenOffice.org start diverging > and when Oracle decides to put several hundred developers to work on > the next major version number full time I think that is highly unlikely. Oracle has not shown any indication i

Re: sort wierdness

2010-11-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:47:18PM +, Neil Bird wrote: > >I am seeing sort treat '@' specially; in particular, it wanders around > the sort order depending upon the rest of the input line. Anyone have an > explanation? I guess it's something to do with locale, but the input > strings

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Tanguy
Le 05/11/2010 08:47, Andre Robatino a écrit : > You could try "package-cleanup --dupes" or "packages-cleanup --problems" to > look > for problems in the RPM database. What happens if you do "yum reinstall > tzdata" > or yum distro-sync tzdata"? If the latter works, you could try "yum > distro-sy

Re: sort wierdness

2010-11-05 Thread Neil Bird
Around about 05/11/10 12:54, Jakub Jelinek typed ... > Just look into your vocabulary, it is sorted similarly. In most locales > various characters are considered only in second or even later passes > through strings, when strings without those characters are otherwise > equal. OK, I can see w

Re: vmware - virtual machine issue/question

2010-11-05 Thread bruce
hey. sorry, but i'm looking for basic/pretty complete step by step processes on how to create the VM, and install the OS, or rather create the VM of a specific partition/drive. so i'm looking to talk to someone who's actually done this. thanks. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Athmane Madjoud

Re: Flashing images

2010-11-05 Thread Zoltan Hoppar
Hi, Can you do some favor for me? If you are using Firefox, then check dmesg. If you found some segfault inside - about npviewer.bin - then you caught the problem In my fresh installed F14 the dmesg has these strange messages twice relating the latest adobe flash player: [ 6670.306097] npview

Re: Flashing images

2010-11-05 Thread Andre Robatino
Antonio M gmail.com> writes: > > After F14 installation, I note that moving images now are flashing on > some web pages > For example, have a look at http://www.campingmonterosa.com > > I checked on other Os's and they are fine. > Where is the bug?? Maybe this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

renaming files

2010-11-05 Thread arnaldo gomes
Hello Just installed fedora 14 but when I try renaming a file it includes the extension, unlike Fedora 11. Is this normal ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines:

Re: Flashing images

2010-11-05 Thread antonio montagnani
Andre Robatino ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 05/11/2010 14:53: > Antonio M gmail.com> writes: > >> >> After F14 installation, I note that moving images now are flashing on >> some web pages >> For example, have a look at http://www.campingmonterosa.com >> >> I checked on other

Re: renaming files

2010-11-05 Thread stan
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:11:50 + arnaldo gomes wrote: > Just installed fedora 14 but when I try renaming a file it includes > the extension, unlike Fedora 11. > Is this normal ? Could you describe how you are renaming the file? That is, what application are you using? Is it the command line?

Re: Fedora14 install to partition from running system

2010-11-05 Thread stan
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:25:50 + Terry Barnaby wrote: > Is it possible to install Fedora14 onto a spare partition from DVD on > a running Fedora12 system ? > I have two separate 30G partitions on my systems to allow two Fedora > versions to be installed. I normally install a new Fedora onto the

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Miroslaw Baran
On 5 November 2010 11:07, Fernando Cassia wrote: (...) > It´s easy to take the bulk of well-written code developer over a > decade and then "evolve" it with just a couple dozen developers, > adding minor features and patches after each minor release number. > > The truth will be seen when bo

Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread Terry Barnaby
I am trying to make a custom DVD of Fedora14 with all of the current updates using Pungi. I normally also add my own RPM's to create a custom system for my use, but at the moment I am trying to create a standard system. This has worked well in the past howvever with Fedora14 it fails. I am using th

Re: Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread Terry Barnaby
On 11/05/2010 03:42 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: > I am trying to make a custom DVD of Fedora14 with all of the current updates > using Pungi. I normally also add my own RPM's to create a custom system for my > use, but at the moment I am trying to create a standard system. This has > worked > well in

Re: renaming files

2010-11-05 Thread Peter Larsen
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 14:11 +, arnaldo gomes wrote: > Hello > > Just installed fedora 14 but when I try renaming a file it includes > the extension, unlike Fedora 11. > Is this normal ? There's really no such thing as "extension" with Linux. You can easily have a file called my.very.long.file

Re: Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: > On 11/05/2010 03:42 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >> I am trying to make a custom DVD of Fedora14 with all of the current updates >> using Pungi. I normally also add my own RPM's to create a custom system for >> my >> use, but at the moment I am t

how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Arthur Bela
Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? Thanks.. :D :\ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/05/2010 04:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? Lots of people do. You'll have to be a bit more specific about what you actually want. I guess it's more than 4*atan(1.0) Andrew. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe o

Re: Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:38 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >> On 11/05/2010 03:42 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >>> I am trying to make a custom DVD of Fedora14 with all of the current updates >>> using Pungi. I normally also add my own RPM's to create a

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
On 11/05/2010 04:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > > Thanks.. :D :\ Any book on numerical algorithms should give you a good run down on how you can implement this in general. If you're not looking to get too deep into this then Wikipedia has an article t

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread JD
On 11/05/2010 09:40 AM, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > > Thanks.. :D :\ I do not have that specific file, but this might help you Calculate pi to 800 digits in 160 characters of code. Written by Dik T. Winter at CWI. int a=1,b,c=2800,d,e,f[2801],g;

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Jim Davis
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? a[52514],b,c=52514,d,e,f=1e4,g,h;main(){for(;b=c-=14;h=printf("%04d", e+d/f))for(e=d%=f;g=--b*2;d/=g)d=d*b+f*(h?a[b]:f/5),a[b]=d%--g;} ...though that's only good for the first 15,000 digits. You p

Re: Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread Terry Barnaby
On 11/05/2010 04:43 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:38 PM, mike cloaked wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: >>> On 11/05/2010 03:42 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: I am trying to make a custom DVD of Fedora14 with all of the current updates u

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:40:34 +0100 Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? bsd-games has a pi tool for some reason -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: VirtualBox-OSE from RPM Fusion cannot be installed on F14

2010-11-05 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > I forgot, If you've installed the OSE version, uninstall it before > installing Oracle's one. Thanks again, Manuel! Paul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedo

gnome-shell

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Tanguy
In fedora14, i just give a try to gnome-shell and then i go back to compiz. But now in the Applications menu i have only 3 items : Apps, Games and Tools. How to go back to "good" configuration ? Thanks Eric -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscripti

Re: gnome-shell

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Tanguy
Le 05/11/2010 18:29, Eric Tanguy a écrit : > In fedora14, i just give a try to gnome-shell and then i go back to > compiz. But now in the Applications menu i have only 3 items : Apps, > Games and Tools. How to go back to "good" configuration ? > Thanks > > Eric > In fact logout and login solve th

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 11/05/2010 03:28 AM, Peter Boy wrote: > Just as a gentle reminder: That's one side of the coin, the other is: > You're supposed to contribute. Over the past several years, I've made over 1300 posts at fedoraforums.org, almost all giving advice, help and suggestions to others. I haven't done

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Joe Zeff
On 11/05/2010 09:49 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/05/2010 04:40 PM, Arthur Bela wrote: >> Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > > Lots of people do. You'll have to be a bit more specific about > what you actually want. I guess it's more than > > 4*atan(1.0) > > Andrew. As a side

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 17:40 +0100, Arthur Bela wrote: > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? And do not lose Fabrice Bellard's Pi record... with Fedora. http://bellard.org/ Cheers. -- Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo - nosp...@gmail.com otbits.blogsp

Re: how to generate pi in c

2010-11-05 Thread Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 19:12 +0100, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 17:40 +0100, Arthur Bela wrote: > > Does anyone has a "generate-pi.c" source code? > > And do not lose Fabrice Bellard's Pi record... with Fedora. > http://bellard.org/ Damn! Didn't knew he was beaten by a

Re: Fedora14: Problme with pungi ?

2010-11-05 Thread mike cloaked
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote: > I am trying to track this down. Running the low level > /usr/libexec/anaconda/buildinstall script gives me errors saying that "strip" > is > missing (No errors seen running pungi ...) > This could be causing the binary install to the initrd

Re: NetworkManager VPN Doesn't Work: vpnc F14 x86_64

2010-11-05 Thread Kevin Johnson
I have the same exact problem. Posted in fedoraforums just a bit ago http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1412811&posted=1#post1412811 When I connect using just vpnc CLI I get the errror: vpnc: Error binding to source port. Try '--local-port 0' Seems that pluto is listening on port

Arado Websearch and Bookmark Organizer released for Fedora

2010-11-05 Thread thomasasta
ARADO is an open source Bookmark-Database for Websearch. You easily can save and organize your favourite URLs (Bookmarks). The database can be networked with your further devices like laptop, mobile phone, home or work PC, so that all added URLs are synchronized with your connected devices. The

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 20:05:16 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > But I have repeated a couple of times already (through the years...) that > there are *two* communities here: the community of > developers/maintainers/packagers --- in other words people who get to make > choices, and the co

Re: Offline updates

2010-11-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 13:32:27 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote: > 1) I'm pretty sure the DVD lets you upgrade the existing system.. so why > would you need a clean install? If he has stuff installed that's not on the DVD, an upgrade may not work too well. -- users mailing list users@lists.fed

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:21:33 -0700 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 11/04/2010 10:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand why people don't want to move to > > LibreOffice. Could folks expand on why they don't want to more? > > Right now, the only things I know about it are its cutesy name an

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:22:40 -0700 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 11/04/2010 01:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > As a user, you can either trust their judgment and go along with > > LO, or oppose their judgment if you think you know better. And the > > latter means, if you think you can criticize their ch

Re: Preupgrading headless remote systems

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Myers
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Steve Berg wrote: > So far I've had very good luck with preupgrade for 12 to 14 and 13 to 14 > systems.  There's one annoyance that is causing me some headache.  I have > a couple of systems that are headless and remote that I'd like to do a > preupgrade on but I ca

Re: Fedora 14 security spin minor issues

2010-11-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 05:38:49 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > Hello all; > > I've just installed Fedora 14 security spin (I already enjoyed Fedora 13 > Sec Spin) into a VM and I've noticed that they are no background and no > install icon on desktop (I have launched installer from termina

Re: Preupgrading headless remote systems

2010-11-05 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Robert Myers writes: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Steve Berg wrote: >> So far I've had very good luck with preupgrade for 12 to 14 and 13 to 14 >> systems.  There's one annoyance that is causing me some headache.  I have >> a couple of systems that are headless and remote that I'd like to d

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Chris Adams writes: Once upon a time, Fernando Cassia said: The truth will be seen when both LO and OpenOffice.org start diverging and when Oracle decides to put several hundred developers to work on the next major version number full time I think that is highly unlikely. Oracle has not sho

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Chris Smart
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:> > It seems to me that if Oracle was serious in investing in free software, > four years would've been plenty of time for Oracle to show how much > development effort they are willing to put forth, and for their product to > evolve into a comp

Re: Fedora F13 to F14 upgrade leaves RPM database with strange mix of fc13 and fc14 packages

2010-11-05 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/05/2010 06:27 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote: > ** Found 4 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: > mlt-python-0.5.10-1.fc13.i686 has missing requires of python(abi) = > ('0', '2.6', None) > openshot-1.2.2-1.fc13.noarch has missing requires of python(abi) = ('0', > '2.6', None) >

Re: Preupgrading headless remote systems

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Myers
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > > Robert Myers writes: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Steve Berg wrote: >>> So far I've had very good luck with preupgrade for 12 to 14 and 13 to 14 >>> systems.  There's one annoyance that is causing me some headache.  I have >>

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Paul Otheim
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Chris Adams writes: > > Once upon a time, Fernando Cassia said: >> >>> The truth will be seen when both LO and OpenOffice.org start diverging >>> and when Oracle decides to put several hundred developers to work on >>> the next major versi

Re: F14: high temperatures after coming back from hibernate

2010-11-05 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/04/2010 05:40 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > I have noticed a strange problem after I come back from hibernate and > upgrade in F14 on my Thinkpad T61. The temperatures are off the charts, > hitting as high as 95C, and staying there, soon after waking up. The > laptop has become unusable, basical

Re: NetworkManager VPN Doesn't Work: vpnc F14 x86_64

2010-11-05 Thread Christopher A. Williams
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 15:21 -0400, Kevin Johnson wrote: > I have the same exact problem. Posted in fedoraforums just a bit ago > > > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1412811&posted=1#post1412811 > > > > > When I connect using just vpnc CLI I get the errror: > > > vpnc: Error

Re: I have lost the ability to save music in MP3 format [SOLVED....sort of]

2010-11-05 Thread Paul Otheim
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:22 AM, stan wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:56:18 -0400 > Paul Otheim wrote: > > > I went into the ~/.gconf/system folder, since the problem was not > > application specific it seemed like a good place to start. > > I don't have that folder in ~/.gconf on my system. Onl

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Paul Otheim writes: Oh, wait. Their licensing policy make that impossible. Unless they change them, of course. What a pickle they're in, huh? P.S. One thing I do agree on -- LibreOffice needs a better name. How about Free Office ;^ ) *BLATANT SUPPOSITION FOLLOWS* That's BFS, FUD

Re: sort wierdness

2010-11-05 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 11/05/2010 06:07 AM, Neil Bird wrote: > The '@' gets > binned along with the quotes and spaces, and the meandering is down to the > line it's on changing from 'COMP' to just 'C' (as far as the sort is > concerned). I'm pretty sure the values aren't "changed". 'COMP' is sorted where it should

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Roger
> > Please understand: I'm not saying I don't want to switch, I'm saying > > that both options should be there for those who want them. This discussion 'flat lined' days ago - it's going nowhere and doing so at snail's pace. Fedora and Open Source people are fiercely protective of 'Open' so i

Re: I want OO.o support, not Go-OO from Novell - Any statement from Fedora or RedHat?

2010-11-05 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Chris Smart wrote: > Indeed, and just look at what they did with OpenSolaris. Dead. Solaris was a niche, even for Sun. I saw it on Sun Tech Days were talks about Netbeans had much more attendance than "OpenSolaris" for that matter. I don't blame Oracle for trying

using audit2allow

2010-11-05 Thread Jim
Fedora 14 /KDE This is the real Raw Audit Message. This location that has a bunch of FAQ's which one is for making policies, http://docs.fedoraproject.org/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Where is there a very good instructions on creating policies. # audit2allow -w -a node=(removed) type=AVC msg=

Appropriate values for gitversion, gitdate when building RPM packages

2010-11-05 Thread Nick Urbanik
Dear Team, Inspired by Dave Witbrodt's success in getting free ATI drivers working with his HD 5750 described here: http://www.pubbs.net/201011/xorg/75-evergreen-accel-works-great-on-my-radeon-hd-5750.html I am building some RPM packages to make my wife and son's iMac 27-inch machines finally w

Re: Appropriate values for gitversion, gitdate when building RPM packages

2010-11-05 Thread suvayu ali
On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote: > How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values > with the result of a git clone? git describe ? Or do you mean something else? PS: Please don't CC the old redhat address. It has been deprecated for many months now. -- Suvayu

Re: Appropriate values for gitversion, gitdate when building RPM packages

2010-11-05 Thread Nick Urbanik
On 05/11/10 20:00 -0700, suvayu ali wrote: >On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote: >> How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values >> with the result of a git clone? > >git describe ? Thank you. >Or do you mean something else? No, I'm a git newby. And gitdate is ju

Re: Appropriate values for gitversion, gitdate when building RPM packages

2010-11-05 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Friday 05 November 2010 08:32 PM, Nick Urbanik wrote: > On 05/11/10 20:00 -0700, suvayu ali wrote: >> On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote: >>> How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values >>> with the result of a git clone? >> >> git describe ? > > Thank you. Wha

Re: using audit2allow

2010-11-05 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 11/06/2010 01:52 AM, Jim wrote: > Fedora 14 /KDE > > This is the real Raw Audit Message. > > This location that has a bunch of FAQ's which one is for making > policies, http://docs.fedoraproject.org/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 > > Where is there a very good instructions on creating policies. > >