On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:41 +0200, Henrik Frisk wrote:
>> I had no idea even cc, subject and body could be specified in a mailto
>> tag.
>
> *Can* be, but isn't going to work in all occasions. I say that for
> those who try to put such URIs in web pag
On Tue, 11 May 2010 03:44:00 +, g wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>
> > you can only connect to koji via ssl if you have a fedora user certificate
> > imported into firefox. its a side effect of the ssl cert authentication
> > that we do.
>
> so why is it that in past i could log koji, an
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:04 -0700, jackson byers wrote:
> I also don't understand what is the use of NM_CONTROLLED=no
For when someone is running NetworkManager, and they won't that
interface left alone.
It is, or was, possible to use both NetworkManager and the network
services at once, so long
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 15:54 +, g wrote:
> i was filtering out *base 64* posters, but there are several of them
> who do appear to be rather versed in their knowledge. tho i do wish
> they would show more of their knowledge by posting *text/plain*.
You might acquire a bit of knowledge, and lear
On 05/11/2010 05:11 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 15:54 +, g wrote:
>
>> i was filtering out *base 64* posters, but there are several of them
>> who do appear to be rather versed in their knowledge. tho i do wish
>> they would show more of their knowledge by posting *text/plain*.
>>
Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 04:03 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
> Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
>
it FC 12 x86_64 bit kernel
On 05/11/2010 06:33 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
> Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
>
What?
[egres...@meimei RSS-Estimates_Do
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 04:03 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
> Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
>
what do you think about PAE ker
>
> > Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a
> 64-
> > bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> > matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
>
> What?
>
> [egres...@meimei RSS-Estimates_Docs]$ cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal
Jatin K wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I've a new Dell Inspiton 1564 laptop with 1GB graphics card and 4GB DDR3
> RAM, FC 12 64bit installed on it , but in system information tab it
> shows 3.7GB usable RAM. My Question is "what about the remaining RAM ??"
> is it shared with graphics card ? then what i
15. what release are you using? I am using F12
are you using cups for print manager? Yes
what printer are you using? Samsung SCX-4216F (multifunction)
is it listed in printer configs? No, I tried to configure it manually on
LPD after it wasn't detected on the probe, but there is no machine
spe
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 05:27 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Jatin K wrote:
>
>> Dear All
>>
>> I've a new Dell Inspiton 1564 laptop with 1GB graphics card and 4GB DDR3
>> RAM, FC 12 64bit installed on it , but in system information tab it
>> shows 3.7GB usable RAM. My Question is "what about the r
On Tue May 11 2010, Mike Guilmot wrote:
> > > Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora
> > > or a
> >
> > 64-
> >
> > > bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory,
> > > no matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
> >
> > What?
> >
Tim:
>> base 64 and HTML are two completely different things. There are some
>> languages which just aren't going to post in text/plain.
Ed Greshko:
> I think you may have mis-typed or I'm misreading.
>
> The only RFC defined text MIME types that I'm aware of are
>
> css, csv, html, plain
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 03:44:00 +, g wrote:
>
> > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >
> > > you can only connect to koji via ssl if you have a fedora user certificate
> > > imported into firefox. its a side effect of the ssl cert authenti
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 19:41 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 07:03:23 pm Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > Trying to follow a link to "koji - Fedora Package Build System" in the
> > Fedora Wiki:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/index
> >
> > Even after telling Fire
Jatin K wrote:
>> Maybe the integrated graphics card is still stealing some RAM (256MiB?)
>> even if you don't use it.
>> A quick Google search of your "1564" appears to confirm that the
>> integrated graphics card is not useable.
>
> integrated graphics card is not usable ??? means ?
> can u
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 13:04 +0100, Simon Tierney wrote:
> 15. what release are you using? I am using F12
>
> are you using cups for print manager? Yes
>
> what printer are you using? Samsung SCX-4216F (multifunction)
>
> is it listed in printer configs? No, I tried to configure it manually
> on
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 06:33 -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
I would expect 32 bit machinews
On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:38:16 -0500, Robert wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 03:44:00 +, g wrote:
> >
> > > Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > you can only connect to koji via ssl if you have a fedora user
> > > > certific
On 05/11/2010 09:36 PM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>
>>> base 64 and HTML are two completely different things. There are some
>>> languages which just aren't going to post in text/plain.
>>>
> Ed Greshko:
>
>> I think you may have mis-typed or I'm misreading.
>>
>> The only RFC defined text
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 09:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 19:41 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Monday 10 May 2010 07:03:23 pm Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > > Trying to follow a link to "koji - Fedora Package Build System" in the
> > > Fedora Wiki:
> > >
> > > https
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:17:38 -0500
Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 06:33 -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> > Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> > bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> > matter how much if you
Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> Exactly what I encountered. The wiki needs to be changed.
>
The link in question that you cited is under a section titled:
Resources for Fedora Package Collection *contributors*
Meaning: If you maintain packages in Fedora you will have already set up
the proper S
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:35:51 -0500, Michael wrote:
> Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > Exactly what I encountered. The wiki needs to be changed.
> >
>
> The link in question that you cited is under a section titled:
>
> Resources for Fedora Package Collection *contributors*
>
> Meaning: If you
I have found 2 methods for allowing individual users, or groups access
to certain hosts via the directory server. (document link)
1. the host attribute
setup:
on server: the host attribute can be defined after adding a user, it
must list each host by fqdn that the user has access to
on clien
On 05/10/2010 12:04 PM, jackson byers wrote:
> Phil Meyer wrote:
>
>> NM_CONTROLLED=
>>
>
>> Depending upon what you want to do.
>>
>
>> Will you ever use a Cell card on this system?
>> Will you ever change IPs temporarily, or often?
>>
>
>> It can be useful to let
On Lun 10 May 2010 18:09:46 Rich Megginson escribió:
> Francisco José Pérez González wrote:
> > Hi, i have some problems with suffixs, im new to LDAP so maybe im
> >
> > misunderstanding concepts, Ok here it goes...
> >
> > Im working with centos-ds. Im asking here beacause the solutions
> > p
On Tue, 11 May 2010 09:41:10 -0600
Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 12:04 PM, jackson byers wrote:
> > Phil Meyer wrote:
> >
> >> NM_CONTROLLED=
> >>
> >
> >> Depending upon what you want to do.
> >>
> >
> >> Will you ever use a Cell card on this system?
> >> Will you eve
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 14:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> The solution was to build a new version of ffmpeg from SVN. That
> solves the synch problem and the rest is just a matter of playing with
> the settings.
Just to close this off, I reported the problem on the RPMFusion BZ and a
fixed v
Hi all,
I have seen a weird behavior of my DS (1.1.2). It has a very small database
(only about 2300 objects). A client performed a one-level search retrieving the
children. The server find 114 objects, but the search was very slow:
[06/May/2010:12:23:11 +] conn=127 op=149 SRCH base= scope=
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:51:44 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > The solution was to build a new version of ffmpeg from SVN. That
> > solves the synch problem and the rest is just a matter of playing with
> > the settings.
>
> Just to close this off, I reported the problem on the RPMFusion BZ
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:42 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:51:44 -0430
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > > The solution was to build a new version of ffmpeg from SVN. That
> > > solves the synch problem and the rest is just a matter of playing with
> > > the settings.
> >
>
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have seen a weird behavior of my DS (1.1.2). It has a very small
> database (only about 2300 objects). A client performed a one-level
> search retrieving the children. The server find 114 objects, but the
> search was very slow:
>
> [06/May/2010:12:23:
On Monday 10 May 2010 05:58 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:34:18 -0400
>> "Marcus D. Leech" wrote:
>>
>>
>> You want to:
>>
>> - make sure the 'xauth' package is installed on the machine you are
>>connecting to.
>>
>> - Use 'ssh -X' (NOTE: cap X, not x). lower case x d
On 05/11/2010 01:42 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:51:44 -0430
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>>> The solution was to build a new version of ffmpeg from SVN. That
>>> solves the synch problem and the rest is just a matter of playing with
>>> the settings.
>>
>> Just to close this o
John Aldrich wrote:
> Just a question here... are you running a 32-bit version of Fedora or a 64-
> bit version? 32-bit versions will only show about 3 gigs of memory, no
> matter how much if you have 20 Gigs, you'll only see 3.
That information is not correct. Using a PAE kernel all memory is av
Jatin K wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 05:27 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> Jatin K wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> I've a new Dell Inspiton 1564 laptop with 1GB graphics card and 4GB DDR3
>>> RAM, FC 12 64bit installed on it , but in system information tab it
>>> shows 3.7GB usable RAM. My Quest
Phil Meyer wrote
> When using static NM_MANAGED ifcfg-ethX definition files, you do need to
> have complete entries in there, including DNS.
> You can set:
> DNS1=
> DNS2=
> DOMAIN=
> etc
> in the ifcfg file, and NM will then generate a proper resolv.conf for you.
---
thanks Phil, this
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 15:16 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> 24FPS was the minimum frame rate where you didn't notice the "flicker"
> of movies, but has no relationship to power line frequencies used for
> a lot of video stuff
Of course not, since you don't watch films with the lights on (usually,
you
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 16:42 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Now if we could only solve the ultimate mystery: Why the folks
> designing video standards selected audio and video frame rates with no
> common divisors :-).
Well, I'll blame computer geeks who don't think things through like
engineers, for
On 05/11/2010 05:43 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
>
>
I'm not that worried, given that all the computers involved are mine, on
a network that is also mine,
behind a virewall that I manage.
--
Marcus Leech
Principal Investiga
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:43 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
That's not clear from the man file:
-X Enables X11 forwarding. This can also be specified on a per-host
basis in a configuration file.
On Tuesday 11 May 2010, Tim wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:43 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
>
>That's not clear from the man file:
>
>-X Enables X11 forwarding. This can also be specified on a
> per-host basis in a conf
I was disappointed when I read through the Go / No Go meeting log tonight
when I read that we would have to slip. Then I remembered the evidence of
hard work I observed over the last couple of weeks and thought, that people
are going to notice the slip and grumble about that and forget about the
ha
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 07:25 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:43 -0700, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
>
> That's not clear from the man file:
>
> -X Enables X11 forwarding. This can also be specified on a per-host
>
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:43:22 -0700
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
This is not a good idea. ;)
If you use -X it uses all the regular xauth checks for access/security.
If you use -Y it makes a 'trusted' forward. This could leave you
ex
Here Here!
Some great work from folks trying to get this release out the door and
meeting all our release criteria!
I'd like to note all the work of Adam Williamson, James Laska, and
Kamil Páral in the QA group for all their long hours of testing and
managing bugs and blocker issues.
kevin
Hi Kevin,
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 09:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:43:22 -0700
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> May I suggest using -Y instead of -X. Its supposed to be more secure.
>
> This is not a good idea. ;)
>
> If you use -X it uses all the regular xauth checks for access/secur
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 04:41 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jatin K wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 05:27 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Jatin K wrote:
Dear All
I've a new Dell Inspiton 1564 laptop with 1GB graphics card and 4GB DDR3
RAM, FC 12 64bit installed on it , but in system in
51 matches
Mail list logo
