On 02/19/18 04:59, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>
>> strings /usr/lib/modules/4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64/extra/nvidia/nvidia.ko |
>> grep gcc
>
> I get my nvidia source from the negativo17 repository and all this command
> does is
> list the version of gcc used
And that was the entire purpose of asking t
On 18/2/18 9:14 pm, François Patte wrote:
Le 18/02/2018 à 10:54, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 02/18/18 17:01, François Patte wrote:
$ strings
/usr/lib/modules/4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64/extra/nvidia-340xx/nvidia.ko |
grep gcc
gcc version 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) (GCC)
OK. I believe that RET
On 18/2/18 8:28 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline co
On 17/2/18 10:59 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
(4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
kernel: Spectre V2 : Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
kernel: Spectre V2 : System may be vulnerable to s
Le 18/02/2018 à 14:22, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 21:03, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 18/02/2018 à 11:20, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 02/18/18 18:14, François Patte wrote:
fc27 is the last "stable" version of fedora, and gcc-7.3 seems to have a
patch for retpoline, why the patched
On 02/18/18 21:55, François Patte wrote:
> Le 18/02/2018 à 14:36, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 02/18/18 21:03, François Patte wrote:
>>> but I am unable to reinstall virtualbox
>>
>> For the virtualbox drivers just run...
>>
>> sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup
> This file (vboxdrv.sh) does n
Le 18/02/2018 à 14:36, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 21:03, François Patte wrote:
>> but I am unable to reinstall virtualbox
>
>
> For the virtualbox drivers just run...
>
> sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup
This file (vboxdrv.sh) does not exist on my system... Are we running the
s
On 02/18/18 21:03, François Patte wrote:
> but I am unable to reinstall virtualbox
For the virtualbox drivers just run...
sudo /usr/lib/virtualbox/vboxdrv.sh setup
This will rebuild the modules for the running kernel only.
--
A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
signature.asc
Desc
On 02/18/18 21:03, François Patte wrote:
> Le 18/02/2018 à 11:20, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 02/18/18 18:14, François Patte wrote:
>>> fc27 is the last "stable" version of fedora, and gcc-7.3 seems to have a
>>> patch for retpoline, why the patched version is not available in fedora
>>> repos?
>>
>
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 14:03:31 +0100
François Patte wrote:
> Le 18/02/2018 à 11:20, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> > On 02/18/18 18:14, François Patte wrote:
> >> fc27 is the last "stable" version of fedora, and gcc-7.3 seems to have a
> >> patch for retpoline, why the patched version is not available in
Le 18/02/2018 à 11:20, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 18:14, François Patte wrote:
>> fc27 is the last "stable" version of fedora, and gcc-7.3 seems to have a
>> patch for retpoline, why the patched version is not available in fedora
>> repos?
>
>
> What do you mean it isn't available in the
On 02/18/18 18:14, François Patte wrote:
> fc27 is the last "stable" version of fedora, and gcc-7.3 seems to have a
> patch for retpoline, why the patched version is not available in fedora
> repos?
What do you mean it isn't available in the repo? That is where mine came from.
[egreshko@meimei
Le 18/02/2018 à 10:54, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 17:01, François Patte wrote:
>> $ strings
>> /usr/lib/modules/4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64/extra/nvidia-340xx/nvidia.ko |
>> grep gcc
>>
>> gcc version 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) (GCC)
>
>
> OK. I believe that RETPOLINE support isn't ava
On 02/18/18 17:01, François Patte wrote:
> $ strings
> /usr/lib/modules/4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64/extra/nvidia-340xx/nvidia.ko |
> grep gcc
>
> gcc version 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) (GCC)
OK. I believe that RETPOLINE support isn't available in that version of gcc.
gcc-7.3.1-2.fc27 is the
Le 17/02/2018 à 22:28, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:58:22 -0800
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2018 02:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > It is going to be in a log file. So, you look or don't look. Up
> > to you. Go to /var/log and see how many other logs are generated
> > that you never look at and contain stuff most people won't
On 02/17/2018 02:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It is going to be in a log file. So, you look or don't look. Up to you. Go to
/var/log and see how many other logs are generated that you never look at and
contain
stuff most people won't understand.
I'm not saying that it shouldn't be done, just th
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2018 02:32 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> If that's accepted, I or someone else can work on adding the
>> same V=1 to the make command for the other nvidia-*-kmod
>> packages.
>
> The question is, how many people would want to see the extra output or know
> what to do with
On 02/18/18 06:41, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2018 02:32 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> If that's accepted, I or someone else can work on adding the
>> same V=1 to the make command for the other nvidia-*-kmod
>> packages.
>
> The question is, how many people would want to see the extra output or know
On 02/17/2018 02:32 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
If that's accepted, I or someone else can work on adding the
same V=1 to the make command for the other nvidia-*-kmod
packages.
The question is, how many people would want to see the extra output or
know what to do with it? I know people who'd hav
On 02/18/18 06:32, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Thanks for sending me on a fun hunt Ed.
I sure am glad you did it. I was too lazy. Figured it works for vbox it
"must" be
the same for nVidia. :-) :-)
--
A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline compiler
On 02/17/18 23:48, François Patte wrote:
>> Do you have any modules, such as a Wifi driver, that you've built yourself?
> No!
Well, vbox and nVidia do qualify. :-) See my other response.
--
A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
> Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
>>> returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
>>> vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline compiler
>>>
>>> As these mo
Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
>> returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
>> vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline compiler
>>
>> As these modules are compiled on board with gcc using akmod
On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
> returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
> vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline compiler
>
> As these modules are compiled on board with gcc using akmod, I suppose
> that gcc is not a retpoline compiler
Le 17/02/2018 à 18:11, Wolfgang Pfeiffer a écrit :
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:25:06 +0100
> François Patte wrote:
>
>> Le 17/02/2018 à 12:59, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
(4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:25:06 +0100
François Patte wrote:
> Le 17/02/2018 à 12:59, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> > On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
> >> I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
> >> (4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
> >>
> >> kernel: Spectre V2
Le 17/02/2018 à 14:32, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/17/18 20:25, François Patte wrote:
>>> [egreshko@acer vulnerabilities]$ cat spectre_v2
>>> Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
>> this one gives:
>>
>> Mitigation: Full generic retpoline - vulnerable module loaded
>>
>> But does not give the module
On 02/17/18 20:25, François Patte wrote:
>> [egreshko@acer vulnerabilities]$ cat spectre_v2
>> Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
> this one gives:
>
> Mitigation: Full generic retpoline - vulnerable module loaded
>
> But does not give the module name!!
Do you have any modules, such as a Wifi dri
Le 17/02/2018 à 12:59, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
>> I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
>> (4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
>>
>> kernel: Spectre V2 : Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
>> kernel: Spectre V2 : System may
On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
> I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
> (4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
>
> kernel: Spectre V2 : Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
> kernel: Spectre V2 : System may be vulnerable to spectre v2
>
> What do they mean a
Bonjour,
I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
(4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
kernel: Spectre V2 : Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
kernel: Spectre V2 : System may be vulnerable to spectre v2
What do they mean and what to do? Waiting for next kernel upda
33 matches
Mail list logo
