Am 12.06.2013 08:49, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> Am 11.06.2013 23:39, schrieb lee:
>>> One question that just occurred to me when looking at [1]: Do I need to
>>> do anything about grub? Yum says the version from Fedora 18 is
>>> installed, so I should be fine?
>>
>> the grub-con
Am 11.06.2013 23:39, schrieb lee:
> One question that just occurred to me when looking at [1]: Do I need to
> do anything about grub? Yum says the version from Fedora 18 is
> installed, so I should be fine?
the grub-configuration abd grub itself in the MBR is usally
not touch at upgrades which
Am 12.06.2013 00:41, schrieb lee:
> For example, I know for sure that I never needed or wanted the package
> "xorg-x11-drv-mga-1.6.2-6.fc18.x86_64", yet it is listed by
> "package-cleanup --leaves --all". Why is this package installed, and
> since I didn't install it, why does it remain installe
Am 11.06.2013 21:55, schrieb lee:
>>> It seems so --- the question is why aren't such packages removed by yum
>>> distro-sync?
>>
>> because it is not it's job to remove any package which is not
>> found in the repos because you may have installed it manually
>>
>> it's job is to bring packages w
BTW, for some reason I don't seem to get your posts from the list. It
could be some sort of dupe checking gnus does on my side, but I thought
I should mention it just in case.
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 12.06.2013 00:41, schrieb lee:
>> For example, I know for sure that I never needed or wante
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 06/11/2013 03:41 PM, lee wrote:
>> + There doesn't seem to be anything like aptitude Debian has that lets
>> you view what packages there are, what is installed, etc.. I know
>> there's some GUI gnome tool for that --- which, unfortunately,
>> doesn't seem to
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 23:39, schrieb lee:
>> One question that just occurred to me when looking at [1]: Do I need to
>> do anything about grub? Yum says the version from Fedora 18 is
>> installed, so I should be fine?
>
> the grub-configuration abd grub itself in the MBR is usall
On 06/11/2013 03:41 PM, lee wrote:
+ There doesn't seem to be anything like aptitude Debian has that lets
you view what packages there are, what is installed, etc.. I know
there's some GUI gnome tool for that --- which, unfortunately,
doesn't seem to even come close. I'm not usin
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 21:55, schrieb lee:
It seems so --- the question is why aren't such packages removed by yum
distro-sync?
>>>
>>> because it is not it's job to remove any package which is not
>>> found in the repos because you may have installed it manually
>>>
>>>
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 01:15, schrieb lee:>> that is why i do "rm -rf
> /var/cache/yum/*" since years
>>> before dist-upgrades and after *every time* i used
>>> "--releasever=" wich a changed param
>>
>> Sounds good, but I don't know if that might remove files which are still
>> n
Am 11.06.2013 04:10, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>>> | [root@yun etc]# yum list installed |grep fc17
>>> | NetworkManager-gtk.x86_64 1:0.9.6.4-3.fc17 installed
>>> | [...]
>>> `
>>>
>>> For example, is this version of networkmanager-gtk in Fedora 18?
>>
>> there is no "net
Am 11.06.2013 01:43, schrieb lee:> Reindl Harald
writes:
>> distro-sync is supposed to upgrade/downgrade all packages to the exact
>> versions in the online-repos and in case you had updates-testing
>> enabled as example the way to go to revert this in a predictable way
>
> Ok, let's try this:
Am 11.06.2013 01:15, schrieb lee:>> that is why i do "rm -rf /var/cache/yum/*"
since years
>> before dist-upgrades and after *every time* i used
>> "--releasever=" wich a changed param
>
> Sounds good, but I don't know if that might remove files which are still
> needed...
there are no files ne
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 04:10, schrieb lee:
>> Reindl Harald writes:
| [root@yun etc]# yum list installed |grep fc17
| NetworkManager-gtk.x86_64 1:0.9.6.4-3.fc17 installed
| [...]
`
For example, is this version of networkmanager-gtk in Fe
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 11.06.2013 01:43, schrieb lee:> Reindl Harald
> writes:
>>> distro-sync is supposed to upgrade/downgrade all packages to the exact
>>> versions in the online-repos and in case you had updates-testing
>>> enabled as example the way to go to revert this in a predictable
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM, lee wrote:
>> "T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>>
Allegedly, on or about 11 June 2013, lee sent:
> Sounds good, but I don't know if that might remove files which are
> still needed ...
Nothing should need to be kept in the cache, if anything is needed in
the future, it will be redownloaded.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.8.13-100.fc
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 10.06.2013 16:34, schrieb lee:
>>> This is exactly what `yum distro-sync` is supposed to do. Figuring
>>> out why it's unhappy is the first step to getting your system back
>>> into working order.
>>
>> Maybe there's nothing to sync because yum figures this is Fedora
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:29:37 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>
>>
>> When I attempt remove these, yum wants to remove packages from 18 as
>> well due to dependencies. Are there packages in 18 that depend on
>> packages from 17, and why would that be?
>>
>
> Not all pkgs marked *fc1
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 10.06.2013 16:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
>> lee wrote:
>> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>>
>>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>>> However, I have now the two directories, "
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
> lee wrote:
> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>
>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
>> /var/cache/yum/x86_64/. Shouldn
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:43 AM, lee wrote:
> "T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
>>> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
>>> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>>
>>> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't
Am 10.06.2013 16:45, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
> lee wrote:
> d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>>
>> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
>> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
>> /var/cache
Am 10.06.2013 16:34, schrieb lee:
>> This is exactly what `yum distro-sync` is supposed to do. Figuring
>> out why it's unhappy is the first step to getting your system back
>> into working order.
>
> Maybe there's nothing to sync because yum figures this is Fedora 18?
distro-sync does not car
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:29:37 +0200
lee wrote:
>
> When I attempt remove these, yum wants to remove packages from 18 as
> well due to dependencies. Are there packages in 18 that depend on
> packages from 17, and why would that be?
>
Not all pkgs marked *fc17* are from Fedora 17,
there can be a
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:43:10 +0200
lee wrote:
d the fedora-release package seemed to fix the problem.
>
> Now when install a package, the package from 18 gets installed.
> However, I have now the two directories, "17" and "18", in
> /var/cache/yum/x86_64/. Shouldn't that somehow be cleaned?
>
I
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
>> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
>> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>>
>> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't find any. I have orphaned packages:
>
>
> I wouldn
"T.C. Hollingsworth" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, lee wrote:
>> Same result, no packages marked for sync. It doesn't do anything and
>> the packages from 17 remain installed along with the ones from 18.
>
> Hmm, maybe your repository configuration is still unhappy? What does
> `y
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>
> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't find any. I have orphaned packages:
I wouldn't worry about these. A package being "or
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, lee wrote:
> Same result, no packages marked for sync. It doesn't do anything and
> the packages from 17 remain installed along with the ones from 18.
Hmm, maybe your repository configuration is still unhappy? What does
`yum repolist` say?
Also, you could try a
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:20:30 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I could do
>>
>> package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc17 | xargs yum remove
>>
>> ... but how do I know if essential packages are being removed that
>> way? At least what yum says looks good as in that there don't seem
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:20:30 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hmm, I could do
>
> package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc17 | xargs yum remove
>
> ... but how do I know if essential packages are being removed that
> way? At least what yum says looks good as in that there don't seem to
> be any packages from 18 rem
lee writes:
> Frank Murphy writes:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
>> lee wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
>>> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
>> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>>
>> What can I do now
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>
> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>
>
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>
> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>
>
R
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 06/08/2013 01:51 PM, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through, please
>> see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>>
>> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mi
On 06/08/2013 01:51 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through, please
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
Have you tried yum-complete-transaction? If that do
Hi,
running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through, please
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
--
Fedora 17.5
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
39 matches
Mail list logo
