On Thu, 14 May 2020 12:14:07 -0500
dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 22:57:42 -0500
> i...@itwrx.org wrote:
>
> > On 5/13/20 10:02 PM, D&R wrote:
> > > nftable.conf is setup as:
> > >
> > > flush ruleset
> > > table inet nat {
> > > chain postrouting {
> > >
On 5/14/20 12:14 PM, D&R wrote:
> My nftables has been running for hours with no problem.
>
> Thanks for your responses,
>
> David
great! I didn't do much, but you're welcome. :) sometimes it just helps
to have someone to bounce ideas off of.
ITwrx
___
On Wed, 13 May 2020 22:57:42 -0500
i...@itwrx.org wrote:
> On 5/13/20 10:02 PM, D&R wrote:
> > nftable.conf is setup as:
> >
> > flush ruleset
> > table inet nat {
> > chain postrouting {
> > type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept;
> > masq
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:58 PM ITwrx wrote:
>
> maybe something else is running like firewalld? i've been using nftables
> for a while on other distros and now on fedora and i haven't seen any
> changes being made to my nftables.conf.
>
> maybe run "systemctl status firewalld"?
>
Quite possibl
On 5/13/20 10:02 PM, D&R wrote:
> nftable.conf is setup as:
>
> flush ruleset
> table inet nat {
> chain postrouting {
> type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept;
> masquerade random,persistent
> }
> }
> table inet filter {
> c
nftable.conf is setup as:
flush ruleset
table inet nat {
chain postrouting {
type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept;
masquerade random,persistent
}
}
table inet filter {
chain input {
type filter hook input
