Re: How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

On 4/22/25 3:15 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: On 4/22/2025 3:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/22/25 2:26 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: Hi-   Am just now getting around to upgrading a secondary HP laptop from FC39 -> FC40.   The post-reboot upgrade process for FC40 appears to display a ster

Re: How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

Ron Flory via users wrote: > On 4/22/2025 3:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 4/22/25 2:26 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: >>> I don't launch my Linux systems into GUI-mode by default If you don't want to use the graphical boot in general, removing `rhgb quiet` (or just `rhgb`) from the kernel comman

Re: How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

On 4/22/2025 3:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/22/25 2:26 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: Hi-   Am just now getting around to upgrading a secondary HP laptop from FC39 -> FC40.   The post-reboot upgrade process for FC40 appears to display a sterile windoze-style GUI progress-indication now. 

Re: How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

On 4/22/25 2:26 PM, Ron Flory via users wrote: Hi-  Am just now getting around to upgrading a secondary HP laptop from FC39 -> FC40.  The post-reboot upgrade process for FC40 appears to display a sterile windoze-style GUI progress-indication now.  It initially sat there at 0% for a long,

How to select text-based "system-upgrade reboot" progress indication?

Hi-  Am just now getting around to upgrading a secondary HP laptop from FC39 -> FC40.  The post-reboot upgrade process for FC40 appears to display a sterile windoze-style GUI progress-indication now.  It initially sat there at 0% for a long, LONG time, which scared the [bleep] out of me.  

Re: Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

> On 19 Nov 2024, at 17:12, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > > with "dnf distro-sync" failed with result 'oom-kill' (no time to > investigate the precise reason of that). One of the reasons for dnf5 development is to fix high memory usage in dnf4. Barry --

Re: Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

Hi On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:18:07 +0100 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Note: there is probably duplicates RPMs. dnf4 provides (not dnf5 > AFAIK): > dnf remove --duplicates > that may help before distro-sync I had today a machine (a VM with only 4G of memory) where an upgrade with "dnf dis

Re: Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

aybe something else? /usr/bin/dnf (F40) is a /usr/bin/python3 script. I suspect that python3.13 (Fedora 41) has been installed, giving the symlink: /usr/bin/python3 -> python3.13 but that dnf5 and the python3-libdnf* RPMs have not be installed (before the failure of system-upgrade). pyt

Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

Hi Everyone, I attempted a dnf-system-upgrade on an old server (F40) to match the new server (F41) I've been setting up for the migration. The dnf-system-upgrade on the old server went sideways after step 3: `dnf system-upgrade reboot`. On the old server, it appears the upgrade partially hap

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:38 PM wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > > rebuild its packages for F41. > > RPMfusion repos are already on F41. Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion,

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 4 Nov 2024, at 12:58, Barry wrote: > > This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 > to f41/dnf5. Should say database with the “repo info cannot…”. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 2 Nov 2024, at 22:04, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Functionality" where that display is new with F41 and for me, for every > update, that 2nd line lists the repository as "". This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 to f41/dnf5. As you update the repo dat

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On 2/11/24 15:23, jim.cro...@gmail.com wrote: new here is the 2nd line below - perhaps the replacing line is obvious, and suppressible ?  xwaylandvideobridge                                 x86_64     0.4.0-7.fc41                                        updates                     209.3 KiB  

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

OK++ Ive upgraded 1/2 machines, using graphical interface from the "notify" prompt. all went smoothly. Speed of update seems faster, maybe its the ~3 progress bars updating so smoothly. new here is the 2nd line below - perhaps the replacing line is obvious, and suppressible ? xwaylandvideobri

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On 10/30/24 4:39 PM, t_...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). E

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Oct 30, 2024, at 16:18, Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. If it’s a cron job that runs as your user as part of your login session (and shouldn’t ever run if yo

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run > X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron > job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). Everything is OK. My X11 / C / Motif stuff k

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Once upon a time, Dave Close said: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? That hasn't ever been true... -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to user

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:18 PM Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I don't run X so I can't say for certain. But there's a lot of X11 gear in the standard repos: $ d

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "Tact is insulting a man without d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359his knowing it." dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > rebuild its packages for F41. RPMfusion repos are already on F41. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject

dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Hi Everyone, I just upgraded three machines to Fedora 41 using . The machines were two desktops and one server. All the machines use the default Fedora repos; and they do not use third party repos. The process went as expe

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On 4/14/24 14:20, Tim via users wrote: On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: Then in corporate life, I needed to ensure a stable development environment. This is one of the big problems with computers in the work place. You may have single-task computers which you want to work,

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On 4/15/24 20:04, Tim via users wrote: Samuel Sieb: The only reason this is a problem for some manufacturers is because they want to keep it proprietary. Printers and scanners (and any other hardware) that use open standards or provide open-source drivers work great with Linux. Compare the dif

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

Tim: >> Let's be clear, we're not talking about annoying changes to how the >> desktop looks, that can be put up with. But when you find essential >> software and/or hardware doesn't work anymore, or doesn't exist >> anymore, and support libraries are incompatible, that's a deal-breaker. >> >> It'

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On 4/14/24 11:20, Tim via users wrote: Let's be clear, we're not talking about annoying changes to how the desktop looks, that can be put up with. But when you find essential software and/or hardware doesn't work anymore, or doesn't exist anymore, and support libraries are incompatible, that's a

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On 4/14/24 06:49, Fulko Hew wrote: Thanks for giving me the guts to do a brute force power cycle in the apparent middle of an upgrade in progress. (FYI.  The upgrade to F39 also hung at the boot message,  and it too needed a power-cycle to successfully boot.) If it's still at the boot message,

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > Then in corporate life, I needed to ensure a stable development > environment. This is one of the big problems with computers in the work place. You may have single-task computers which you want to work, and not mess around with. You may have

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 9:49 AM Fulko Hew wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 7:16 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > Then it was back to are-install for F33 because it was a hardware > replacement, and Linux/Fedora does not have a one-true backup/restore > process that I have ever seen. [...] Th

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 7:16 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 17:37 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, > > > > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 >

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 17:37 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, > > > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 Just as an aside: leaving a two year old Fedora system without updatin

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 6:05 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 4:30 PM Fulko Hew wrote: > >> >> I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, >> so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 >> I used the: >> >> dnf system-update download --releasever=xx >> p

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 4:30 PM Fulko Hew wrote: > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 > I used the: > > dnf system-update download --releasever=xx > process. > Related, you should follow < https://docs.fedoraproject.org

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:04 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote: > > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, > > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 > > I used the: > > > > dnf system-update download --releasever=xx >

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 13:29 -0700, Fulko Hew wrote: > I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, > so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 > I used the: > > dnf system-update download --releasever=xx > process. > > - My first update from F35 to F36 worked. > - Then I did

how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

I don't update my Fedora systems unless I have a real need, so yesterday I started updating from F35 to F38 I used the: dnf system-update download --releasever=xx process. - My first update from F35 to F36 worked. - Then I did the F36 to F37 update. KDE wouldn't work until I uninstalled qt5-qtw

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

On 03/07/2023 15:05, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 7/3/23 07:08, lejeczek via users wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by 'in-place' do not work? You cannot update an EL 7 FreeIPA server to EL 8, nor can you update from EL 8 to EL 9.  The only supported path is to add a new replica, running the new

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

On 7/3/23 07:08, lejeczek via users wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by 'in-place' do not work? You cannot update an EL 7 FreeIPA server to EL 8, nor can you update from EL 8 to EL 9. The only supported path is to add a new replica, running the new version, and then retire the old server. (I

Re: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

FreeIPA replica, and then decommission the old system. How does this work on Fedora?  Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? I'm not sure what you mean by 'in-place' do not work? My c7 days are quite a way beh

Re: FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

, add it as a FreeIPA replica, and then decommission the old system. How does this work on Fedora?  Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? How did you manage to send the exact same email 3 times? Honestly, I have no idea

Re: FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

decommission the old system. How does this work on Fedora?  Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? How did you manage to send the exact same email 3 times? On Fedora, you can use system-upgrade. I have multiple freeipa VMs

FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

this work on Fedora? Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? -- Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy

FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

this work on Fedora? Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? -- Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy

FreeIPA on Fedora and dnf system-upgrade

this work on Fedora? Will I be able to use dnf system-upgrade, or will I find myself having to use the process described above? -- Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 15:14:49 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. > > Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to > system-upgrade-reboot: > 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HD

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

Le 2023-06-05 18:20, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 12:41 -0300, George N. White III wrote: On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:15 AM François Patte < francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Bonjour, > > Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. > > Downloading the package wa

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

Le 2023-06-05 20:19, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 6/5/23 06:14, François Patte wrote: Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: What exact commands did you run? When downloading f36 packages ends, the

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

On 06/05/2023 10:59 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote: At that point, I would boot off the Fedora 38 workstation live image, back up your /home directory to a USB disk or something like that, nuke your computer, and do a fresh install, and restore your home directory. And this time, put /home on its ow

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

On 6/5/23 06:14, François Patte wrote: Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: What exact commands did you run? 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HDD accesses Did it reboot to the

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

On 6/5/23 08:14, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HDD accesses 2- After sometimes (when no more accesses were

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

ng the package was okay. > > > What package? > > From: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/#sect-how-many-releases-can-i-upgrade-across-at-once > "... it is highly recommended to perform the upgrade before your > release > reaches End of

Re: issue with dnf system upgrade

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:15 AM François Patte < francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Bonjour, > > Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. > > Downloading the package was okay. What package? From: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-u

issue with dnf system upgrade

Bonjour, Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HDD accesses 2- After sometimes (when no more accesses were showed, I press enter key on the

Re: System upgrade verification

Jeffrey Walton wrote: > This always baffles me... Fedora includes irrelevant keys. For > example, old keys and keys for different arches. Something feels wrong > about trusting them. You don't have to trust them if you don't want. :) Other than for upgrades, they're not automatically used, so tru

Re: System upgrade verification

Once upon a time, Jeffrey Walton said: > This always baffles me... Fedora includes irrelevant keys. For > example, old keys and keys for different arches. Something feels wrong > about trusting them. The arch-specific keys are symlinks. The files in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg are not all in your RPM datab

Re: System upgrade verification

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:43 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > To upgrade from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38 the instructions > > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) sa > > y: > >... > >5. When the new G

Re: System upgrade verification

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > To upgrade from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38 the instructions > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) sa > y: >... >5. When the new GPG key is imported, you are asked to verify the key’s >fingerprint. Refer to htt

System upgrade verification

To upgrade from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38 the instructions (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) sa y: ... 5. When the new GPG key is imported, you are asked to verify the key’s fingerprint. Refer to https://getfedora.org/security to do so. Which  never

Re: Updating grub after dnf-system-upgrade

On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:47:58 -0400 Jeffrey Walton wrote: > (I have open questions about systems that claim both BIOS and UEFI, > but I have not been able to find answers. If I need to back up a bit, > then please say so). This may or may not be helpful, but when I make a "universal" boot USB stic

Re: Updating grub after dnf-system-upgrade

On 4/26/23 22:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I just dnf-upgraded my last system from F37 to F38. One of the post-upgrade task is "Update GRUB bootloader on BIOS systems" (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/): Systems with the BIOS firmware have th

Updating grub after dnf-system-upgrade

Hi Everyone, I just dnf-upgraded my last system from F37 to F38. One of the post-upgrade task is "Update GRUB bootloader on BIOS systems" (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/): Systems with the BIOS firmware have the GRUB RPM packages updated. Ho

Re: attempt system-upgrade f35-f36 fails on mutter

On 5/7/22 03:37, Neal Becker wrote:  sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=36 --skip-broken --best Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y [...] Error: Problem: package mutter3.38-lib

Re: attempt system-upgrade f35-f36 fails on mutter

On Sat, 7 May 2022 06:37:11 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: > libwacom-1.12.1-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository This means that the package has been removed from the new fedora version. Once you are updated, you can try reinstalling mutter3.38-libs to pick up the mutter3.38-

Re: attempt system-upgrade f35-f36 fails on mutter

On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 6:37 AM Neal Becker wrote: > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=36 --skip-broken --best > Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running > "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y > [...] >

attempt system-upgrade f35-f36 fails on mutter

sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=36 --skip-broken --best Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y [...] Error: Problem: package mutter3.38-libs-3.38.6-1.fc35.x86_64 requires lib

Re: dnf system-upgrade dependency resolution failure

Samuel Sieb writes: On 5/3/21 4:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34. Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase- selinux-0.23.0.20

Re: dnf system-upgrade dependency resolution failure

On 5/3/21 4:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34. Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063

dnf system-upgrade dependency resolution failure

I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34. Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 - libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.2

Re: system-upgrade in plymouth vs console, and logging

Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes: On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:09:20AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just started the upgrade on another laptop, but after plymouth came up, it bumped down to the system console to run the upgrade. It's running now just fine, on the system console. I don't recall if thi

Re: system-upgrade in plymouth vs console, and logging

Ed Greshko writes: On 02/05/2021 23:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I was surprised to see that "dnf system-upgrade log" offered me logs going all the way back to the F30-F31 upgrade in 2019. They certainly don't take up much space, but I'm just wondering if they ever get

Re: system-upgrade in plymouth vs console, and logging

On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:09:20AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just started the upgrade on another laptop, but after plymouth came up, it bumped down to the system console to run the upgrade. It's running now just fine, on the system console. I don't recall if this laptop always did that, so

Re: system-upgrade in plymouth vs console, and logging

On 02/05/2021 23:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I was surprised to see that "dnf system-upgrade log" offered me logs going all the way back to the F30-F31 upgrade in 2019. They certainly don't take up much space, but I'm just wondering if they ever get cleaned up. I don't se

system-upgrade in plymouth vs console, and logging

I updated a laptop to F34. The laptop uses the spinfinity plymouth theme. system-upgrade ran while the theme was chugging along, showing brief status messages in a top level corner, i.e. "Updating ". This is my regular upgrade experience; and nothin unusual about that. I just s

Re: /var/lib/system-upgrade

On 09/01/2021 04:51, Erik P. Olsen wrote: I've noticed that the subject directory contains a lot of fc22 rpm's. Can somebody explain what purpose it serves? It takes up much apparently unused space (some 1.5 GB) that I would happily use for other purposes. None.  It would seem to be a remnant

/var/lib/system-upgrade

I've noticed that the subject directory contains a lot of fc22 rpm's. Can somebody explain what purpose it serves? It takes up much apparently unused space (some 1.5 GB) that I would happily use for other purposes. -- Erik P. Olsen - Copenhagen, Denmark Fedora 33/64 bit xfce Claws-Mail POP3 Gra

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails (update)

M Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates 25 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree 23 kB/s | 3.1 kB 00:00 > > Dependencies resolved. > > Nothing to do. > > Complete! > > > > $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --rele

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

ot;sudo dnf > > upgrade --refresh" > > - reboot by typing "sudo reboot" if kernel update was installed > > - Install Fedora update utility by "sudo dnf install > > dnf-plugin-system-upgrade" > > - start the upgrade procedure and download pac

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 9/2/20 11:41 PM, Thomas Klein wrote: That said, you didn't explicitly mention whether you did **install the "Fedora update utility"** Could it be you didn't do that: "sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade" FWIW, to be on the safe side (sorry if this

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

t;** Could it be you didn't do that: "sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade" FWIW, to be on the safe side (sorry if this of no help) here's the process: - create a backup - upgrade all installed packages of Fedora version 31 by running "sudo dnf upgrade --refresh

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 2020-09-03 02:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >>> $ sudo dnf distro-sync >>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM >>> CDT. >>> Error: >>> Problem: The operation

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

cies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > > $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 > Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running > "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y > Adobe Systems Incorporated

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 9/2/20 3:30 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: might want to try adding --allowerasing to the dnf upgrade option. I just upgraded some systems, and it seemed that fc31 had some newer versions of packages than the fc32, and they had to be downgraded for the update to go thru. You could

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 9/2/20 1:38 PM, Andras Simon wrote: You seem to have a lot of non-Fedora repos enabled. For example Adobe Systems Incorporated Fedora 31 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 This is actually a Fedora supplied repo config. google-chrome etc. I'd remove the packages which comes from these repos

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 2 Sep 2020 at 13:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Date sent: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:10:28 -0500 From: Ranjan Maitra To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails Organization: Mailbox

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:38:14 +0200 Andras Simon wrote: > 2020-09-02 20:10 UTC+02:00, Ranjan Maitra : > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > > >> Have you installed any packages from outside Fedora's repos? > > > > I don't know the answer: a student who knows quite a bit about

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

2020-09-02 20:10 UTC+02:00, Ranjan Maitra : > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: >> Have you installed any packages from outside Fedora's repos? > > I don't know the answer: a student who knows quite a bit about Fedora used > to use it. But it has never been a problem to upgrade

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:51:26 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > $ sudo dnf distro-sync > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM > > CDT. > > Error: > > Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protect

Re: system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

On 9/2/20 9:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: $ sudo dnf distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:06 ago on Wed 02 Sep 2020 11:22:53 AM CDT. Error: Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: dnf, systemd, systemd-udev (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip

system-upgrade f31 to f32 on CLI fails

RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates 25 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree 23 kB/s | 3.1 kB 00:00 Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 Before you continue ensure that your system is

Re: system-upgrade

On 1 Sep 2020 at 19:17, Samuel Sieb wrote: Subject:Re: system-upgrade To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: Samuel Sieb Date sent: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:17:36 -0700 Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users

Re: system-upgrade

On 9/1/20 6:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: I'd recommand doing one version upgrade at a time. You are suppose to be able to upgrade 2 versions, but I once had it fail and system was not easily fixable, so just did a clean install that was a pain to get back to the state of the syste

Re: system-upgrade

lled_pkgs`date +%F`.txt Then can pipe that into a dnf install. Sometime have to remove some lines for packages that no longer exist or have been replaced. Good Luck. On 1 Sep 2020 at 18:40, François Patte wrote: To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: François Patte Subject:

Re: system-upgrade

On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 18:40 +0200, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I have a computer which runs fedora 29, may I use dnf system-upgrade to > upgrade to fedora 32? > > Thank you. > > If not, what is the safer way to upgrade? system-upgrade is expected to work acro

system-upgrade

Bonjour, I have a computer which runs fedora 29, may I use dnf system-upgrade to upgrade to fedora 32? Thank you. If not, what is the safer way to upgrade? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints

Re: dnf upgrade vs dnf system-upgrade?

On Sat, 16 May 2020 17:14:53 +0100 (BST) Michael Young wrote: > On Sat, 16 May 2020, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > There is an option called "upgrade" under dnf system-upgrade. > > > > However: https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-31-to-fedora-32/ does >

Re: dnf upgrade vs dnf system-upgrade?

On Sat, 16 May 2020, Ranjan Maitra wrote: There is an option called "upgrade" under dnf system-upgrade. However: https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-31-to-fedora-32/ does not mention it and suggests using: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 What is the

Re: dnf upgrade vs dnf system-upgrade?

e terminal you are running the command in (unless you're on the > console) or the desktop could crash. Then you end up with a > half-upgraded system that might not function. The system-upgrade runs > offline with nothing else running so it's safe that way. Also, > system-upgr

Re: system upgrade from F28 to F31: problem with installed package NetworkManager-libnm

> Only skipping a single version is "supported". You should upgrade to > either F29 or F30 before going to F31. I would recommend F29 if you want > to get to F31 or else go to F30, then F32. Thanks, F28 -> F30 apparently works. ___ users mailing list --

Re: system upgrade from F28 to F31: problem with installed package NetworkManager-libnm

On 5/11/20 9:47 AM, Frédéric wrote: I would like to upgrade a system from F28 to F31. But I get the following error: Only skipping a single version is "supported". You should upgrade to either F29 or F30 before going to F31. I would recommend F29 if you want to get to F31 or else go to F30,

system upgrade from F28 to F31: problem with installed package NetworkManager-libnm

Hi, I would like to upgrade a system from F28 to F31. But I get the following error: Problem: problem with installed package NetworkManager-libnm-1:1.10.12-3.fc28.x86_64 - package NetworkManager-libnm-1:1.20.10-1.fc31.x86_64 conflicts with NetworkManager-glib < 1:1.20.10-1.fc31 provided by Net

  1   2   3   >