On 5/12/24 14:56, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I am trying to list the virtual servers in my Apache httpd configuration
on Fedora 38. My internet searches keep turning up references to using
either apachectl or apache2ctl with the -S option, but neither one seems
to work on Fedora.
# apachectl -S
I am trying to list the virtual servers in my Apache httpd configuration
on Fedora 38. My internet searches keep turning up references to using
either apachectl or apache2ctl with the -S option, but neither one seems
to work on Fedora.
# apachectl -S
apachectl: The "-S" option is not
Tim:
>> The conf.d/*.conf files are processed in alphabetical order, so name
>> your default virtual host's configuration file to be picked first (e.g.
>> 000-default.conf). Filenames don't have to be the same as the domain
>> name, by the way.
Franta Hanzlík:
> IMO this alphabetical order proce
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:13:35 +0930
Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 17:39 +0200, Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> > There is also the question of security and resistance to attacks from
> > the Internet. And since the attacks will most likely go to the IP address
> > (not the ServerName), it m
On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 17:39 +0200, Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> There is also the question of security and resistance to attacks from
> the Internet. And since the attacks will most likely go to the IP address
> (not the ServerName), it might be a good idea to make one more (fake)
> Virtualhos
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 22:48:28 +0100
Barry wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2023, at 16:40, Franta Hanzlík via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > When a request is received, the server first maps it to the best matching
> > based on the local IP address and port combination only.
> > Non-wildcards have a higher pr
> On 27 Aug 2023, at 16:40, Franta Hanzlík via users
> wrote:
>
> When a request is received, the server first maps it to the best matching
> based on the local IP address and port combination only.
> Non-wildcards have a higher precedence.
The HTTP Host header is also used to match to the
; :
> >
> > Hi,
> > how is it possible to best configure multiple virtual servers, given
> > how Fedora has organized configuration files for inclusion in Apache
> > httpd.conf? Especially if I want some configuration files to be used
> > by only some Virtual
I’m not sure, if I really understood the issue, you want to resolve
> Am 26.08.2023 um 20:29 schrieb Franta Hanzlík via users
> :
>
> Hi,
> how is it possible to best configure multiple virtual servers, given
> how Fedora has organized configuration files for inclusion in A
On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 20:29 +0200, Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> I suppose I will create four configuration files for each Virtualhost
> in the /etc/httpd/conf.d/ directory (eg srv1_intranet.mydom_ssl.conf,
> srv2_intranet.mydom.conf, srv3_www.mydom_ssl.conf, srv4_www.mydom.conf).
> But how b
Hi,
how is it possible to best configure multiple virtual servers, given
how Fedora has organized configuration files for inclusion in Apache
httpd.conf? Especially if I want some configuration files to be used
by only some VirtualHost sites?
Example - I want to have 4 web servers (VirtualHost
On 6/17/2023 9:11 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jun 17, 2023, at 19:38, Bill Cunningham wrote:
I want to apply fedora 38 to a VM in GCP to run in the VM. The
thing is I am new to servers and the installation instructions are
beyond me. I have always used console and even rarely GUI
On Jun 17, 2023, at 19:38, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> I want to apply fedora 38 to a VM in GCP to run in the VM. The thing is
> I am new to servers and the installation instructions are beyond me. I have
> always used console and even rarely GUI. SO the desktop is what
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 8:38 PM Bill Cunningham
wrote:
> I want to apply fedora 38 to a VM in GCP to run in the VM. The
> thing is I am new to servers and the installation instructions are
> beyond me. I have always used console and even rarely GUI. SO the
> desktop is what
I want to apply fedora 38 to a VM in GCP to run in the VM. The
thing is I am new to servers and the installation instructions are
beyond me. I have always used console and even rarely GUI. SO the
desktop is what I am used to. How do you install a server edition to
remote storage? What is
The answer is Hell No!
Fedora is no where near stable enough and secure enough.
On 1/26/2023 11:25 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 08:04, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 6, 2022, at 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 08:04, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see folks using RHEL or
> > CentOS. I don't understand why organizations run that antique software
> > that is no longer in development. Fedora p
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 00:33, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 2022-12-06 04:55, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> > From the above quotes, I thought that Meta/Facebook servers are using
> > Fedora Linux, or at least Linux servers.
>
>
> As far as I know, the answer
ts and community forums.
Regards,
Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:27 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Su
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 21:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?
> >
> > Good day from Singapore,
> >
> > I have just come a
> I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see folks using RHEL or
> CentOS. I don't understand why organizations run that antique software
> that is no longer in development. Fedora provides modern software and
> is in active development with continuous bug fixes.
>
>
The answer is very easy. If
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:46 PM Tim wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 19:30 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > The keyword is "known". Developers don't work on 5 or 10 year old
> > software. Existing bugs don't get uncovered and fixed. They don't
> > become "known", so they don't get backported and f
On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 19:30 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> The keyword is "known". Developers don't work on 5 or 10 year old
> software. Existing bugs don't get uncovered and fixed. They don't
> become "known", so they don't get backported and fixed.
>
> That's exactly the point Greg HK makes at
>
On Dec 6, 2022, at 19:32, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> And dnf-system-upgrade every 6 months is a small price to pay for
> Fedora (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/).
> You get Red Hat processes and stability with modern software. Its a
> win-win.
I suppose it’s a
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:04 PM Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2022, at 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see folks using RHEL or
> > CentOS. I don't understand why organizations run that antique software
> > that is no longer in development. Fedora
On Dec 6, 2022, at 08:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I often recommend Fedora Server anytime I see folks using RHEL or
> CentOS. I don't understand why organizations run that antique software
> that is no longer in development. Fedora provides modern software and
> is in active development with conti
> On 6 Dec 2022, at 12:55, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> Meta engineers believe that any performance cost is small and worth it
> while SUSE engineers previously cited around possible 5~10%
> regressions.
meta engineers do a lot of performance work and their experience is what
On 2022-12-06 04:55, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
From the above quotes, I thought that Meta/Facebook servers are using
Fedora Linux, or at least Linux servers.
As far as I know, the answer is "No". Their production platform is
based on CentOS Stream.
https://www.y
e new features.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:27 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?
> >
> > Good day from Singapore,
> >
> > I have
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:56 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
>
> Subject: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> I have just come across this article.
>
> Article: Fedora's FESCo Rejects The Idea Of "-fno-omit-fr
Subject: Are Meta/Facebook servers using Fedora Linux?
Good day from Singapore,
I have just come across this article.
Article: Fedora's FESCo Rejects The Idea Of "-fno-omit-frame-pointer"
As Default Compiler Flag
Link: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Fedora-Rejects-No-Omit-FP
Hi,
I have a problem with access to RHEL 8 servers by SSH. I want to allow access
to hosts allowed on the host attribute of the LDAP..
For instance:
$ ldapsearch -LLL -Q -Z uid=a-testuser host
dn: uid=a-testuser,ou=People,dc=old,dc=domain,dc=net
host: rhel801.network.lan
$ ldapsearch -LLL -Q
> So, outside of classic Unix/Linux /etc/resolv.conf... most software does
> not treat a list of multiple DNS servers as explicitly "primary" and
> "secondary" (and so on).
Both network manager and systemd-resolved ostensibly support ordering of DNS
servers. I&#x
nix/Linux /etc/resolv.conf... most software does
not treat a list of multiple DNS servers as explicitly "primary" and
"secondary" (and so on). Some software will start with the first, then
at any error or timeout (which can happen due to errors up the recursive
line, not necessar
I could just disable it, but given that systemd-resolved is now a default of
Fedora I thought I'd bring this up as this is having a negative impact on my
experience with Fedora 33.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:30:31 -
Tom Seewald wrote:
> Yeah I'm not very happy that systemd-resolved seemingly does this silently
> and that I have to just restart the service for it to try again.
You could just disable that service, then systemd wouldn't try to
cache dns. There are about a doz
Yeah I'm not very happy that systemd-resolved seemingly does this silently and
that I have to just restart the service for it to try again. My server is just
a consumer router running OpenWRT which uses Dnsmasq.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fed
On 26/10/2020 18:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
At the risk of beating a dead horse, I'll be "that guy" again and point
out that F33 is as yet unreleased and any issues should be sent to the
Fedora Test list until it is released.
Well, since F33 is a GO for release on Tuesday the 27th, I think
use. For
> my connection in Network Manager, under IPv4, I have "192.168.1.1, 1.1.1.1"
> in "Other DNS Servers". My understanding is that this should cause the system
> to prefer 192.168.1.1, and historically it has always consistently used
> 192.168.1.1 until the
twork Manager, under IPv4, I have "192.168.1.1, 1.1.1.1" in
"Other DNS Servers". My understanding is that this should cause the system to prefer 192.168.1.1,
and historically it has always consistently used 192.168.1.1 until the upgrade to F33. At first glace I don't
se
92.168.1.1, 1.1.1.1" in
"Other DNS Servers". My understanding is that this should cause the system to
prefer 192.168.1.1, and historically it has always consistently used
192.168.1.1 until the upgrade to F33. At first glace I don't see any relevant
messages in the system j
Hi All,
If you are getting into servers, here is a tip.
Install qemu-kvm and those OS'es as virtual machines
you are targeting as clients. You can set up your
own mini network to learn and configure things.
I get away with three virtual machines running at
the same time on my system befo
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:19 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create
> additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can
> Linux-based SMTP servers do that?
Shared folders would be a feature o
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 00:18 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Rick Stevens wrote:
> > > Note that at the time I did this (geeze, like 15 years ago), things
> > > like Gmail, Office 365 and many of the other cloud-based email
> > > systems did not exist. We had to roll our own. Would I do it again?
> >
Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Note that at the time I did this (geeze, like 15 years ago), things
>> like Gmail, Office 365 and many of the other cloud-based email
>> systems did not exist. We had to roll our own. Would I do it again?
>> If we needed complete control of things or our email requirements..
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 11:07 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Note that at the time I did this (geeze, like 15 years ago), things like
> Gmail, Office 365 and many of the other cloud-based email systems did
> not exist. We had to roll our own. Would I do it again? If we needed
> complete control of thin
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 12:19 -0400, William Oliver wrote:
> For my size of shop (about 100 users), linux works fine. I don't know
> what the answer is for huge shops that have to have distibuted systems
> -- I've heard that's a lot more complicated, but have never done it.
I used to oversee a univ
On 07/18/2018 10:10 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:07:50 +
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>
>> Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based
>> SMTP servers?
>
> The user controlled mail filtering in exchange is so p
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:07:50 +
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based
> SMTP servers?
The user controlled mail filtering in exchange is so pitiful that
it is useless. I run my own postfix/dovecot/fetchmail setup
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 16:05 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Strange.
>
>
> When I download Exchange from official Microsoft website and installed it in
> Windows Server Evaluation Copy, it never asked me to key in product key or
> ask me to pay for any license fees.
[Again, don
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP
Servers?
On Wednesday 18 July 2018 16:58:42 Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> You mean I have to pay for using Exchange as well, in addition to Windows
> Ser
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:58:42PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> You mean I have to pay for using Exchange as well, in addition to
> Windows Server?
Yes. You have four sets of licenses to purchase:
o Windows Server 2016 Std base license. One-time fee, somewhere around $600.
Thank you!
Now I know I can use webmin to configure SMTP, POP3 and IMAP servers.
From: Dave Ihnat
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:45 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Cc: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: Re: Which is better? Microsoft
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:15 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
>
> Relative ease of installation and c
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:54 PM
*To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org
*Subject:* Re: Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based
SMTP Servers?
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:15 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
> I am torn between deplo
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:58 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> You mean I have to pay for using Exchange as well, in addition to Windows
> Server?
[Please don't top-post replies]
Of course you do. Exchange is a separate product.
> What is seat-based licensing cost?
The cost of the
On Wednesday 18 July 2018 16:58:42 Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> You mean I have to pay for using Exchange as well, in addition to Windows
> Server?
>
>
> What is seat-based licensing cost?
Exchange, both on-premis and O365 is based on a per user license, payable to
Microsoft
etter? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP
Servers?
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:15 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 15:15 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
>
> Relative ease of installation and c
While this is slightly generic, is is applicable here.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:07:50PM +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
It very much depends o
On Wednesday 18 July 2018 16:15:15 Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
> I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
> SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
>
> Relative ease of installation and c
2016 and Linux-based
SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
consideration factor.
Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are
relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are
Good evening from Singapore,
I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
consideration factor.
Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active
Good evening from Singapore,
I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based
SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim.
Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important
consideration factor.
Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active
Running current Fedora 25.
How should I supersede the nameserver when using IPV6 and dhclient?
If I enable IPV6, my dhclient.conf doesn't work as I'd expect, it works as
expected
if only IPV4 is enabled.
I have this:
# cat /etc/dhclient-enp6s0.conf
supersede domain-name-servers
This is a sobering article about Proxy Servers, especially Free Proxy
Servers.
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/proxy-services-totally-unsecure-alternatives/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
Hi,
I have a fedora23 system with clamav installed, and periodically
clamav-notify-servers fails to actually notify the server and responds
with
clamd server '/var/run/clamd.amavisd/clamd.sock' gave '' response
I was just hoping someone else had encountered this problem and
On Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:43 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this: Unnoticed for years, malware turned Linux
> and BSD servers into spamming machines
>
> http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=3030
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgmailing list
> http:/
On Mon, 4 May 2015 19:56:12 +0200
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 04.05.2015, stan wrote:
>
> > I don't see a defense against such exploits as long as people can
> > install software on their systems. The alternative is Mac on
> > steroids, only the software that big brother approves of and allows
> >
On 04.05.2015, stan wrote:
> I don't see a defense against such exploits as long as people can
> install software on their systems. The alternative is Mac on steroids,
> only the software that big brother approves of and allows you to use.
The choice is yours. Either you stick with straight Fed
On Sun, 03 May 2015 12:33:43 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this: Unnoticed for years, malware turned Linux
> and BSD servers into spamming machines
>
> http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=3030
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgmailing list
> http:/
I got this from the freebsd mailing list to which I am subscribed.
Has anyone else seen this: Unnoticed for years, malware turned Linux and
BSD servers into spamming machines
http://www.net-security.org
On 03/24/2015 11:41 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
Thanks, had given it a look a while back and thought it might be a bit
heavy-duty if I just wanted a caldav facility, but it might do. The
Darwin one seems it should be the most compliant, but doesn't play
well with py-caldav.
I use radicale with Thunde
On 24 March 2015 at 14:51, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> I've got a project I'm developing for the raspberry pi which requires
>> a calendar server. ...
>
> You could consider using ownCloud. Among all the other services it offers
> is a shared
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
> I've got a project I'm developing for the raspberry pi which requires
> a calendar server. ...
You could consider using ownCloud. Among all the other services it offers
is a shared calendar.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih..
I've got a project I'm developing for the raspberry pi which requires
a calendar server. While it will probably run on raspbian it would be
handy if I could do some of the work on Fedora. Is radicale the only
calendar server? It's the only one that shows up in a DNF search. They
have a pretty webpa
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:34:52PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> People running servers on a distribution other than a server setup
> (ie. workstation). How often does someone's desktop get a server
> dropped on it during development, then moved to production?
> Developers have do
warning! I have to read up on Captive Portal, but I'm
willing to bet that most people who run servers which are not specifically
intended to be such would rather not have a bunch of pings added to their
network load.
Workstation != server. Please see subject
It sounds as if yo
For people interested in this, there is a "upstream" bug report on gnome
bugzilla [1] about making this optional.
[1] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737362
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject
Hi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 18:25 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > this is essentially how OS X and Windows does it as well.
>
> never been a good excuse...
>
It is a factor that must be considered. Believe it or not, Linux is
highly influenced by ho
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:05:43PM +0200, bitlord wrote:
> currently first option doesn't work because 'gnome-shell' depends on
> 'NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora', second option is possible,
> but I still think it should be made more easier for regular users, and
> should be pointed out
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 18:18 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:38:39AM +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> > And there should be a way to disable this feature or to use it for
> > other ways.
>
> Yes, of course. Remove the NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora
> package, or
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 18:25 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> this is essentially how OS X and Windows does it as well.
never been a good excuse...
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.16.2-201.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Mon Sep 15 20:21:12 UTC 2014 i686
All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted,
On 23.09.2014, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> If a ping every 300 secs(ICMP\HTTP\HTTPS 1\2)Will consume bandwidth and can
> be disabled using a basic FW rules(from a network level).
This is clearly the wrong way to do it, e.g. fixing the symptoms
rather than the root cause of the problem itself.
>
Hi
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Hey Rahul,
>
> I am not sure if there is a production use of Fedora at many places yet.
>
Unclear how this is related but sure, there is. We hear about them pretty
regularly.
http://arunsag.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/flock-2013-fedor
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:38:39AM +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> And there should be a way to disable this feature or to use it for
> other ways.
Yes, of course. Remove the NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora
package, or look at the
/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf f
ways.
I actually was wondering about WIFI captive portals option that pops up
a login page for mobiles.
Eliezer
On 09/23/2014 05:18 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thank you for the warning! I have to read up on Captive Portal, but
I'm willing to bet that most people who run servers
arning! I have to read up on Captive Portal, but I'm
> willing to bet that most people who run servers which are not specifically
> intended to be such would rather not have a bunch of pings added to their
> network load.
>
Workstation != server. Please see subject
Rahul
--
bitlord wrote:
This is about Fedora 21 which is still not released!!! Please read
carefully. And it is only default on Workstation image (that is what I
know)
Thank you for the warning! I have to read up on Captive Portal, but I'm willing
to bet that most people who run servers which ar
Hello,
I know that this is still a devel release, but it's worth noting that it
would appear that it's the standard way of detecting captive portals.
It would appear that chromium and windows both user similar detection
systems for captive portals. I can see this being quite a useful feature
for
On 31.08.2014, bitlord wrote:
> There is a new feature introduced in Gnome and NetworkManager which
> allows 'Captive Portal'[1] services to work. This may be useful feature
> for some users (that is why it is implemented), but most users won't use
> it, and it
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 16:51 +0200, bitlord wrote:
> This is about Fedora 21 which is still not released!!!
Please post F21 questions or comments on the Fedora Test list, not this
one. Some F21 developers don't even read the Users list.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
e
for some users (that is why it is implemented), but most users won't use
it, and it pings fedora servers every '300seconds', it is enabled by
NetworkManager and 'NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora' <<
(package/config file) which is default installed in Workstat
.
>
VM's on a server have increasingly become the norm including in Fedora
infrastructure. It makes deploying instances much more manageable in many
use cases.
> One reason for running CentOS on servers in my case
> is that the CentOS team seem to put reliability and stability
>
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 11:59 +, Bill Oliver wrote:
> I think being comfy with a distro is a big deal
>
> Then Mandriva collapsed. I had to get used to Fedora. When Mageia
> came out, I was tickled pink and immediately installed it -- only to
> find that now I was in the exact opposite posi
2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64.rpm, big difference if you
> install a box to host some virtual machines (depending of what you're
> doing).
If in fact there are apps you need to run on a server
that are available on Fedora but not on CentOS
then obviously you should run Fedora.
I don't run vir
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 12:43 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Cristian Sava wrote:
>
> > I feel more comfortable with Fedora than with Centos and I run Fedora
> > servers for many years with great success.
>
> Why?
> To me it would be irrational to run Fedora rather than
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Cristian Sava wrote:
I feel more comfortable with Fedora than with Centos and I run Fedora
servers for many years with great success.
Why?
To me it would be irrational to run Fedora rather than CentOS on a server,
since the chances of problems
Cristian Sava wrote:
> I feel more comfortable with Fedora than with Centos and I run Fedora
> servers for many years with great success.
Why?
To me it would be irrational to run Fedora rather than CentOS on a server,
since the chances of problems arising would be higher,
and I don
that same misunderstanding, and
causing damage
to the "brand".
Right - IMO, Fedora is in crisis, one primarily made @RH.
Agreed, but I don't think we would agree on exactly what the crisis is.
--Russell
Well,... I think Fedora is a wonderful distro, both for servers &
de
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
