Re: rpm output

Finally, I followed your recommendation, and it appears that all the packages providing errors are intel (2018) packages. > > Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > >> rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) > >> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 > >> Header RS

Re: rpm output

On 10/25/23 17:47, Todd Zullinger wrote: There is some guidance for how to handle this in Common Issues: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/third-party-rpms-with-an-invalid-signing-key-might-cause-errors-during-package-operations/80077 Oh, it's on "discussion". No wonder I couldn't find i

Re: rpm output

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: >> rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) >> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 >> Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: >> Parsing an OpenPGP packet: >>Failed to parse Signature Packet

Re: rpm output

On 10/25/23 13:35, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey) error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears

Re: rpm output

This what I get: rpm -qa | grep pubkey gpg-pubkey-d651ff2e-5dadbbc1 gpg-pubkey-94843c65-5dadbc64 gpg-pubkey-6dc1be18-5ca9b41f gpg-pubkey-c0aeda6e-5ad45327 gpg-pubkey-100bcd92-5ca9b382 gpg-pubkey-9db62fb1-59920156 gpg-pubkey-cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg-pubkey-be1229cf-5631588c gpg-pubkey-7f858107-595fba

Re: rpm output

On 10/18/23 15:31, Barry Scott wrote: On 18 Oct 2023, at 21:45, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:  Failed to parse Signature Packet  because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see

Re: rpm output

> On 18 Oct 2023, at 21:45, Patrick Dupre via users > wrote: > > Failed to parse Signature Packet > because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP > implementation, see > . > because: Malformed MPI:

Re: rpm output

> > > On 17 Oct 2023, at 22:28, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > I do not think so, I removed nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 > > and same thing appears. > > On one machine > > rpm -qa xpr > > xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64 > > One the other machine, the same command > > > > xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64 > > -

Re: rpm output

> On 17 Oct 2023, at 22:28, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > I do not think so, I removed nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 > and same thing appears. > On one machine > rpm -qa xpr > xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64 > One the other machine, the same command > > xpr-1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64 > --More--error: rpmdbN

Re: rpm output

> > > On 17 Oct 2023, at 21:16, Patrick Dupre via users > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > If I make a rpm -qa, I got > > > > xconsole-1.0.7-2.fc34.x86_64 > > nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 > > These are very old packages that are, I think, signed by keys that are > no longer supported

Re: rpm output

> On 17 Oct 2023, at 21:16, Patrick Dupre via users > wrote: > > Hello, > > If I make a rpm -qa, I got > > xconsole-1.0.7-2.fc34.x86_64 > nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 These are very old packages that are, I think, signed by keys that are no longer supported because they are not secu

rpm output

Hello, If I make a rpm -qa, I got xconsole-1.0.7-2.fc34.x86_64 nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 --More--error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet beca