This what I get:
rpm -qa | grep pubkey
gpg-pubkey-d651ff2e-5dadbbc1
gpg-pubkey-94843c65-5dadbc64
gpg-pubkey-6dc1be18-5ca9b41f
gpg-pubkey-c0aeda6e-5ad45327
gpg-pubkey-100bcd92-5ca9b382
gpg-pubkey-9db62fb1-59920156
gpg-pubkey-cfc659b9-5b6eac67
gpg-pubkey-be1229cf-5631588c
gpg-pubkey-7f858107-595fbac5
gpg-pubkey-12c944d0-5d5156ab
gpg-pubkey-7bb74681-5548d874
gpg-pubkey-45719a39-5f2c0192
gpg-pubkey-1d14a795-5ad4532e
gpg-pubkey-09eab3f2-595fbba3
gpg-pubkey-f6777c67-45e5b1b9
gpg-pubkey-e9e25bc4-5e46a4cb
gpg-pubkey-1911e097-57eb894d
gpg-pubkey-7e6c5dbe-5d91bb57
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP
implementation, see
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set
in 101000 (28))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 134
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP
implementation, see
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set
in 1111100 (7c))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 137
........................
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 186
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP
implementation, see
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set
in 1111100 (7c))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
gpg-pubkey-4218647e-61f7b089
gpg-pubkey-38ab71f4-60242b08
gpg-pubkey-33eaab8e-63bd672b
gpg-pubkey-eb10b464-6202d9c6
gpg-pubkey-df7587c3-576a5c23
gpg-pubkey-645f044f-626fcd87
gpg-pubkey-19940e11-5f99778b
and
rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey)
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP
implementation, see
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set
in 101000 (28))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 134
Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing
an OpenPGP packet:
Failed to parse Signature Packet
because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP
implementation, see
<https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>.
because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set
in 1111100 (7c))
Header SHA1 digest: OK
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 137
How can I associate the pubkeys with the package?
Should I rebuild the rpm databasis?
> On 10/18/23 15:31, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 18 Oct 2023, at 21:45, Patrick Dupre via users
> >> <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Failed to parse Signature Packet
> >> because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant
> >> OpenPGP implementation, see
> >> <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351
> >> <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>>.
> >> because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to
> >> be set in 101000 (28))
> >
> > I read the issue 2351 and it is saying that there are RPMs that where
> > signed by a buggy gpg implementation.
> >
> > Apart from dnf remove of the old RPMs you have installed I'm not sure
> > what to suggest you do to fix this.
> >
> > It is odd that your other system is fine. Are there any RPMs that only
> > the problem system has installed?
>
> It might be a bad key in the database.
> Try running "rpm -qa | grep pubkey" to see the list of keys.
> Run "rpm -qi $(rpm -qa | grep pubkey)" to get info on all the keys which
> might indicate which one is bad.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
